Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

POEMS: A Case Study of an Italian Wine-Producing Firm

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade, researchers paid much attention to concepts such as Design for Environment, Extended Producer Responsibility, Responsible Chain Management, and Eco-design. Many management tools and standards (such as EMAS, ISO 14001, LCA, EPD, Ecolabel) have been developed to support companies in the evaluation and management of their environmental performance and to pursue continual environmental improvement. The more recent development of the aforesaid fields looks at interorganizational environmental management. Such an approach can complement the more traditional intraorganizational corporate environmental management approaches and tools. A typical example of this new trend is the Product Oriented Environmental Management System (POEMS), which represents the natural evolution of the above-mentioned tools, combining the features of EMS, EPD and Ecolabel. Although the structure of the POEMS is still not standardized, many experimental applications have yet been carried out in Europe. In developing a POEMS, a company needs to determine all of the environmental impacts caused at all life-cycle stages of the product and, ideally, to reduce all of them through a continual commitment. The aim of the present study was to perform a survey of the developed POEMS models and to analyze their peculiarities and drawbacks in the application to Small and Medium Enterprises. A case study regarding an Italian winery company is presented. The study analyzes the structure and the activities of the examined firm, in order to estimate direct and indirect environmental impacts following a life-cycle approach. The chosen functional unit is a 0.75-L bottle of red wine. The article also suggests some solutions to improve the environmental performances of the firm’s products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ammenberg J., E. Sundin. 2005. Products in environmental management systems: drivers, barriers and experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production 13:405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardente F., G. Beccali, M. Cellura, V. Lo Brano. 2005a. Life cycle assessment of a solar thermal collector: Sensitivity analysis, energy and environmental balances. Renewable Energy 30:109–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ardente F., G. Beccali, M. Cellura, V. Lo Brano. 2005b. Life cycle assessment of a solar thermal collector. Renewable Energy 30:1031–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumonier, S. 1997. Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion: A literature review. Report for IEA Task 24

  • Boustead Consulting Ltd. 2001. Environmental database, ver. 4.4. Boustead Consulting, Ltd., Black Cottage, West Sussex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bras B. 1997. Incorporating environmental issues in product realization. (United Nations UNEP/IE invited contribution). Industry and Environment, 20(1–2):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentrup F., J. Küsters, J. Lammel, H. Kuhlmann. 2000. Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. International Journal of LCA 5(6):349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carnimeo, G., M. Frey, and F. Iraldo. 2002. Gestione del prodotto e sostenibilità. (in Italian) Franco Angeli, Milano

  • Davis, G., C. A. Wilt, P. S. Dillon, and B. K. Fishbein. 1997. Extended producer responsibility: a new principle for product-oriented pollution prevention. Report prepared under cooperative agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste

  • de Bakker F. G. A., A. Nijhof. 2002. Responsible chain management: A capability assessment framework. Business Strategy and the Environment 11(1):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker F. G. A., O. A. M. Fisscher, A. J. P. Brack. 2002. Organizing product-oriented environmental management from a firm’s perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 10:455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming W. E. 1986. Out of the crisis. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K., F. M. Christensen, L. Juul, H. Øllgaard, and C. Nielsen. 2002. Manual on Product oriented of Environmental Work. Danish Environmental protection Agency, Danish Ministry of the Environmental. Environmental News 64

  • Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles. Official Journal of the European Communities L269:34–42

  • DMU (National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark). 2005. Available from http://www.dmu.dk. Accessed on April 2005

  • Ecolabel. 2005. Available from http://www.eco-label.com. Accessed on April 2005

  • EDIT (Eco Design Interactive Tools). 2005. Available from http://www.ecoconcept.com/. Accessed on April 2005

  • European Commission. 2001a. Green paper on Integrated Product Policy. 68 final. COM, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2001b. Commission interpretative communication on the Community law applicable to public procurement and the possibilities for integrating environmental considerations into public procurement. 566 final. COM, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2001c. Summary of Discussions at the 3rd Integrated Product Policy Expert Workshop. Environmental Management Systems (including Product-Oriented Environmental Management Systems). COM, Brussels

  • European Commission DG Environment. 2002. Evaluation of Environmental Product Declaration Schemes. Final Report, September 2002, 119 pp

  • European Commission. 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Integrated Product Policy, Building on Environmental Life-cycle Thinking. 302 final. COM, Bruxelles, Belgium

  • Fiksel J. 1996. Design for environment: Creating eco-efficient products and processes. McGraw-Hil, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • GEMIS—Öko-Institut (Institut für angewandte Ökologie—Institute for Applied Ecology) Global Emission Model for Integrated Systems (GEMIS). 2004. German environmental database. Version 4.1

  • GESAMB Promozione di sistemi di gestione ambientale e di sicurezza alimentare nelle piccole e medie imprese del Mezzogiorno. 2005. Available from http://spa.casaccia.enea.it/gesamb/index.html. Accessed on April 2005

  • Hauschild, M. 2000. Estimating pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products. In: B. P. Weidema and M. J. G. Meeusen. Agricultural data for Life Cycle Assessment. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), The Hague, Vol. II

  • Hauschild M., H. Wenzel. 1997. Environmental assessment of products, Vol. 2: Scientific background. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathwaite, L. 2000. Flows of phosphorous in the environment: Identifying pathways of loss from agricultural land. In B. P. Weidema and M. J. G. Meeusen. Agricultural data for Life Cycle Assessment. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), The Hague, Vol. II

  • Heijungs R. 1996. Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production 4(3–4):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellweg S., G. Geisler. 2003. Life cycle impact assessment of pesticides, International Journal of LCA 8(5):310–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson R. A., B. J. Chambers, P. J. A. Withers, R. Cross. 2002. Phosphorus losses to surface waters following organic manure applications to a drained clay soil. Agricultural Water Management 57:155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2000. Third Assessment Report

  • ISO 14001. 2004. Environmental management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14020. 1998. Environmental labels and declarations: General principles. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14021. 1999. Environmental labels and declarations: Type II environmental labelling: Self declared environmental claims. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14024. 1999. Environmental labels and declarations: Type I environmental labelling: Principles and procedures. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14025. 2000. Environmental labels and declarations: Type III environmental declarations. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14040. 1997. Environmental management: Life cycle assessment: Principles and framework. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14041. 1998. Environmental management: Life cycle assessment: Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14042. 2000. Environmental management: Life cycle assessment: Life cycle impact assessment. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • ISO 14043. 2000. Environmental management: Life cycle assessment: Life cycle interpretation. International organisation for standardisation, Geneva

  • Lifset R. E. 1993. Take it back: extended producer responsibility as a form of incentive-based environmental policy. Journal of Resource Management and Technology 21:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciani R., L. Andriola, S. Sibilio. 2003. I sistemi di gestione ambientale orientati al prodotto: POEMS, un nuovo strumento (in Italian). Ambiente 8:789–796

    Google Scholar 

  • MSR (Swedish Environmental Management Council). 1999. Requirements for Environmental Product Declaration, EPD: An application of ISO TR 14025 Type III Environmental Declarations

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1996. Pollution prevention and control extended producer responsibility in the OECD area. phase 1 report. No. 66. Paris

  • OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1992. Green products by design: Choices for a cleaner environment. US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) N° 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000, on a revised Community eco-label award scheme. Official Journal of the European Communities L 237:1–12

  • Regulation (EC) N° 761/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS). Official Journal of the European Communities L 114:1–29

  • Resetar, S., F. Camm, and J. Drezner. 1998. Environmental management in design: Lessons from Volvo and Hewlett-Packard for the Department of Defense. RAND Corporation, Report MR-1009-OSD. Available from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1009/index.html

  • Rocha C., H. Brezet. 1999. Product-oriented environmental management systems: A case study. Journal of Sustainable Product Design 10:30–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen C. M. 1997. Industrial ecology and the greening of business history. Business and Economic History 26(1):123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Scimìa E., R. Luciani, L. Owen, L. Andriola. 2004. Un’esperienza pilota di valutazione del ciclo di vita nel settore mobili per ufficio (in Italian). Ambiente 4:383–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. 1997. Eco-design innovation in small and medium sized enterprises. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network, University of California, 16–19 November 1997. Santa Barbara, CA

  • van Berkel C. 1994. PRIMA: A Dutch initiative for environmental improvement of retail assortments. Journal of Cleaner Production 2(3–4):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel R. 1996. Cleaner production in practice: Methodology development for environmental improvement of industrial production and evaluation of practical experiences. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam

  • van Berkel R., M. Kampen J. Kortman. 1999. Opportunities and constraints for product-oriented environmental management systems (P-EMS). Journal of Cleaner Production 7:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hemel C. G., J.C. Brezet. 1996. Ecodesign, a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Paris, pp 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weenen J. C. 1995. Towards sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 3:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands). 1989. National environmental policy plan

  • VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands). 1998. Product-oriented environmental management: Its theory and practice

  • Weidema B. P., R. Pedersen T. S. Drivsholm. 1995. Life cycle screening of food products: Two examples and some methodological proposals. Danish Academy of Technical Sciences. Lyngby, Denmark

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H., M. Hauschild L. Alting. 1997. Environmental assessment of products. Vol. 1: Methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman & Hall, London 1997

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Mary Argyraki of the University of Sunderland (UK) for her contribution in the review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Cellura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ardente, F., Beccali, G., Cellura, M. et al. POEMS: A Case Study of an Italian Wine-Producing Firm. Environmental Management 38, 350–364 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0103-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0103-8

Keywords

Navigation