Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Even Conservation Rules Are Made to Be Broken: Implications for Biodiversity

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Despite efforts to enclose and control conservation zones around the world, direct human impacts in conservation areas continue, often resulting from clandestine violations of conservation rules through outright poaching, strategic agricultural encroachment, or noncompliance. Nevertheless, next to nothing is actually known about the spatially and temporally explicit patterns of anthropogenic disturbance resulting from such noncompliance. This article reviews current understandings of ecological disturbance and conservation noncompliance, concluding that differing forms of noncompliance hold differing implications for diversity. The authors suggest that forms of anthropogenic patchy disturbance resulting from violation may maintain, if not enhance, floral diversity. They therefore argue for extended empirical investigation of such activities and call for conservation biologists to work with social scientists to assess this conservation reality by analyzing how and when incomplete enforcement and rule-breaking drive ecological change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams W. H., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J. Elliot, J. Hutton, D. Roe, B. Vira, W. Wolmer. 2004. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306:1146–1149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agee J. K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Akama J. S., C. L. Lant, G. W. Burnett. 1996. A political-ecology approach to wildlife conservation in Kenya. Environmental Values 5:335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Allcock K.G., D. S. Hik. 2003. What determines disturbance–productivity–diversity relationships? The effect of scale, species, and environment on richness patterns in an Australian woodland. Oikos 102:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D., R. Grove. 1987. Introduction: The scramble for Eden: Past, present, and future in African conservation. in D. Anderson, R. Grove (eds.) Conservation in Africa: People, policies, and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pages 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke R., H. I. Scoones, C. Kerven. 1993. Range ecology at disequilibrium: New models of natural variability and pastoral adaptation in African savannas. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonette J. A., and I. Storch. 2002. Fragmentation: Is the message clear? Conservation Ecology 6:14. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art14 (last accessed 30 June 2004)

  • Blumler M. A. 1998. Biogeography of land-use impacts in the Near East. in K. S. Zimmerer, K. R. Young (eds.) Nature’s geography: new lessons for conservation in developing countries. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. Pages 215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin S. R., P. R. Wilshusen, C. L. Fortwangler, P. C. West. 2002. Beyond the square wheel: Towards a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15:41–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower B., A. Dennis. 1998. Grazing the forest, shaping the landscape? Continuing the debate about forest dynamics in Sagarmantha National Park. in K. S. Zimmerer, K. R. Young (eds.) Nature’s geography: New lessons for conservation in developing countries. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. Pages 184–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell L. M. 2002. Conservation narratives in Costa Rica: Conflict and coexistence. Development and Change 33:29–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, M. 2004. A challenge to conservationists. World Watch Nov/Dec:17–31

  • Chase J. M., M. A Leibold. 2002. Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature 416:427–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connell J. H., 1978. Diversity in tropical forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran L. M., S. N. Trigg, A. K. McDonald, D. Astiani, Y. M. Hardiono, P. Siregar, I. Caniago, E. Kasischke. 2004. Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels R., T. J. Bassett. 2002. The spaces of conservation and development around Lake Nakkuru Park, Kenya. The Professional Geographer 54:481–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar U., R. S. Rawal, S. S. Samant. 1997. Structural diversity and representativeness of forest vegetation in a protected area of Kumaun Himalaya, India: Implications for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:1045–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombeck M. P., J. E. Williams, C. A. Wood. 2004. Wildfire policy and public lands: Integrating scientific understanding with social concerns across landscapes. Conservation Biology 18:883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emborg J., M. Christensen, J. Helimann-Clausen. 2000. The structural dynamics of Suserup Skov, a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 126:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernoult A., F. Bureau, I. Poudevigne. 2003. Patterns of organisation in changing landscapes: Implications for the management of biodiversity. Landscape Ecology 18:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few R. 2001. Containment and countercontainment: Planner/community relations in conservation planning. The Geographical Journal 167:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forero J. 2003. A swirl of foreboding in mahogany’s grain. The New York Times September 28, 2003, Late Edition, Final Section 1, Page 14, Column 1

  • Fuhlendorf S. D., D. M. Engle. 2001. Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: Ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. BioScience 51:625–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg C., J. B. Larsen. 2003. “Back to nature”: A sustainable future for forestry? Forest Ecology and Management 179:559–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjertsen H., C. B. Barrett. 2004. Context-dependent biodiversity conservation management regimes: Theory and simulation. Land Economics 80:321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L. H. 2000. Ecological resilience: In theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K. C., J. K. Hill. 2000. Scale-dependent effects of habitat disturbance on species richness in tropical forests. Conservation Biology 14:1435–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman K. R., D. C. Hartnett, R. C. Cochran, C. E. Owensby. 2004. Grazing management effects on plant species diversity in tallgrass prairie. Journal of Range Management 57:58–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R. J., L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M. A. 1994. Biological diversity: The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepe T., I. Scoones. 1999. Creating grasslands: Social institutions and environmental change in Mkambati Area, South Africa. Human Ecology 27:29–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klooster D. J. 2002. Toward adaptive community forest management: Integrating local forest knowledge with scientific forestry. Economic Geography 78:43–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer J. P. 2004. Effects of noncompliance on the success of alternative designs of marine protected-area networks for conservation and fisheries management. Conservation Biology 18:1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull C. 2002. Madagascar aflame: Landscape burning as peasant protest, resistance, or a resource management tool? Political Geography 21:927–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer D. M. 1992. Deforestation in the postwar Philippines. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Laney R. 2002. Disaggregating induced intensification: A case study from Madagascar. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92:702–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laska G. 2001. The disturbance and vegetation dynamics: A review and an alternative framework. Plant Ecology 157:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton J. H., D. E. Bignell, B. Bolton, G. F. Bloermers, P. Eggleton, P. M. Hammond, M. Hodda, R. D. Holt, T. B. Larsen, N. A. Mawdsley, N. E. Stork, D. S. Srivastava, A. D. Watt. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa, and effects of habitat modification in tropical forests. Nature 391:72–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C. 2000. Strategy space and the disturbance spectrum: A life-history model for tree species coexistence. American Naturalist 156:14–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynagh F. M., P. B. Urich. 2002. A critical review of buffer zone theory and practice: A Philippine case study. Society and Natural Resources 15:129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey R. L., D. J. Currie. 2001. The diversity–disturbance relationship: Is it generally strong and peaked? Ecology 82:3479–3492

    Google Scholar 

  • May R. M. 1994. Ecological science and the management of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K., W. Romme, J. Kim, D. Goodwin, and E. Roworth. 2005. Rocky Mountain Landscape Simulator. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/rmlands/rmlands.html (last accessed 30 June 2004)

  • McKinney M. L. 2002b. Do human activities raise species richness? Contrasting patterns in United States plants and fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., R. A. Mittelmeier, C. G. Mittelmeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann R. P. 1997. Primitive ideas: Protected area buffer zones and the politics of land in Africa. Development and Change 28:559–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nygren A. 2004. Contested lands and incompatible images: The political ecology of struggles over resources in Nicaragua’s Indio-Maiz reserve. Society and Natural Resources 17:189–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Oba G., N. C. Stenseth, W. J. Lusigi. 2000. New perspectives on sustainable grazing management in arid zones of Sub-Saharan Africa. BioScience 50:35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, L. Schroeder, S. Wynne. 1993. Institutional incentives and sustainable development. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso N. L. 1996. Fruit trees and family trees in an anthropogenic forest: Ethics of access, property zones, and environmental change in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Studies in Society and History 38(3):510–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres C. A., J. Terborgh. 1995. Amazonian nature reserves: An analysis of the defensibility status of existing conservation units and design criteria for the future. Conservation Biology 9:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters C. 2000. Precolumbian silviculture and indigenous management of neotropical forests. in D. L. Lentz (ed.) Imperfect balance: Landscape transformations in the precolumbian Americas. Columbia University Press, New York. Pages 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G. D. 2002. Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conservation Ecology 6:17. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art17 (last accessed 30 june 2004)

  • Richards M., A. Wells, F. Del Gatto, A. Contreras-Hermosilla, D. Pommier. 2003. Impacts of illegality and barriers to legality: A diagnostic analysis of illegal logging in Honduras and Nicaragua. International Forestry Review 5:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P. 1998. Authority and environment: Institutional landscapes in Rajasthan, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88:410–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P. 2000a. The practical politics of knowing: State environmental knowledge and local political economy. Economic Geography 76:126–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P. 2000b. The rotten institution: Corruption in natural resource management. Political Geography 19:423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P. 2004. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabloom E. W., A. P. Dobson, D. M. Stoms. 2002. Extinction rates under nonrandom patterns of habitat loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:11229–11234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D., D. F. R. P. Burslem. 2003. Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland W. J. 2002. Conservation biology: Openness in management. Nature 418:34–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M. D., 1998. The interaction of grazing history with rainfall and its influence on annual rangeland dynamics in the Sahel. in K. S. Zimmerer, K. R. Young (eds.) Nature’s geography: New lessons for conservation in developing countries. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. Pages 237–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M. D., P. Hiernaux. 2002. The use of herders’ accounts to map livestock activities across agropastoral landscapes in semi-arid Africa. Landscape Ecology 17:367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer J., I. Granzow de la Cerda. 2004. Height dynamics of the thinning canopy of a tropical rain forest: 14 years of succession in a posthurricane forest in Nicaragua. Forest Ecology and Management 199:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman W. E. 1990. Managing for biodiversity. BioScience 40:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. J., K. J. Willis, R. Field. 2001. Scale and species richness: Towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 28:453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (2005). EarthTrends data tables: Biodiversity and protected areas. Available at: http://www.earthtrends.wri.org/pdf_library/data_tables/bio1_2003.pdf (Accessed January 9, 2005)

  • Wright J. S. 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: A review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia 130:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K. S. 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature–society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:356–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Research supporting this review was made possible with the support of the National Science Foundation (Grant #0351037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Robbins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robbins, P., McSweeney, K., Waite, T. et al. Even Conservation Rules Are Made to Be Broken: Implications for Biodiversity. Environmental Management 37, 162–169 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0009-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0009-5

Keywords

Navigation