Environmental Management

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 849–861 | Cite as

Effects of Short- and Long-Term Disturbance Resulting from Military Maneuvers on Vegetation and Soils in a Mixed Prairie Area

  • Sherry A. Leis
  • David M. Engle
  • David M. LeslieJr
  • Jeffrey S. Fehmi


Loss of grassland species resulting from activities such as off-road vehicle use increases the need for models that predict effects of anthropogenic disturbance. The relationship of disturbance by military training to plant species richness and composition on two soils (Foard and Lawton) in a mixed prairie area was investigated. Track cover (cover of vehicle disturbance to the soil) and soil organic carbon were selected as measures of short- and long-term disturbance, respectively. Soil and vegetation data, collected in 1-m2 quadrats, were analyzed at three spatial scales (60, 10, and 1 m2). Plant species richness peaked at intermediate levels of soil organic carbon at the 10-m2 and 1-m2 spatial scales on both the Lawton and Foard soils, and at intermediate levels of track cover at all three spatial scales on the Foard soil. Species composition differed across the disturbance gradient on the Foard soil but not on the Lawton soil. Disturbance increased total plant species richness on the Foard soil. The authors conclude that disturbance up to intermediate levels can be used to maintain biodiversity by enriching the plant species pool.


Community dynamics Intermediate disturbance hypothesis Military disturbance Mixed-grass prairie Richness Soil carbon Vehicular tracking 

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson D. W., D. C. Coleman. 1985. The dynamics of organic matter in grassland soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40:211–216Google Scholar
  2. Aner G. P., S. Archer, R. F. Highes, R. J. Ansley, C. A. Wessman. 2003. Net changes in regional woody vegetation cover and carbon storage in Texas Drylands, 1937–1999. Global Change Biology 9:316–335Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod D. I. 1985. Rise of the grassland biome, Central North America. The Botanical Review 51:163–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer S. G., C. W. Rice, J. M. Blair. 2000. Assessment of soil quality in fields with short- and long-term enrollment in the CRP. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55:142–146Google Scholar
  5. Baer S. G., D. J. Kitchen, J. M. Blair, C. W. Rice. 2002. Changes in ecosystem structure and function along a chronosequence of restored grasslands. Ecological Applications 12:1688–1701Google Scholar
  6. Brady N. C., R. R. Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Briggs J. M., G. A. Hoch, L. C. Johnson. 2002. Assessing the rate, mechanisms, and consequences of conversion of tall-grass prairie to Juniperus virginiana forest. Ecosystems 5:578–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke I. C., W. K. Lauenroth, D. P. Coffin. 1995. Soil organic matter recovery in semiarid grasslands: Implications for the conservation reserve program. Ecological Applications 5:793–801Google Scholar
  9. Burke I. C., W. K. Lauenroth, M. A. Vinton, P. B. Hook, R. H. Kelly, H. E. Epstein, M. R. Aguiar, M. D. Robles, M. O. Aguilera, K. L. Murphy, R. A. Gill. 1998. Plant–soil interactions in temperate grasslands. Biogeochemistry 42:121–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins S. L., 2000. Disturbance frequency and community stability in native tall-grass prairie. The American Naturalist 155:312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins S. L., S. C. Barber. 1985. Effects of disturbance on diversity in mixed-grass prairie. Vegetation 64:87–94Google Scholar
  12. Collins S. L., S. M. Glenn, D. J. Gibson. 1995. Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition: Decoupling cause and effect. Ecology 76:486–492Google Scholar
  13. Connell J. H., 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310Google Scholar
  14. Danley R. F., K. L. Murphy, E. M. Madden. 2004. Species diversity and habitat of grassland passerines during grazing of a prescribe-burned, mixed-grass prairie. Western North American Naturalist 64:72–77Google Scholar
  15. Daubenmire R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetation analysis. Northwest Science 33:43–64Google Scholar
  16. Delcourt H. R., P. A. Delcourt. 1988. Quaternary landscape ecology: Relevant scales in space and time. Quaternary Science Review 2:23–44Google Scholar
  17. Denslow J. S. 1980. Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46:18–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diersing V. E., R. B. Shaw, D. J. Tazik. 1992. U.S. Army Land Condition-Trend Analysis (LCTA) Program. Environmental Management 16:405–414Google Scholar
  19. Dyksterhuis E. J., 1949. Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2:104–115Google Scholar
  20. Engle D. M., T. G. Bidwell. 2001. The response of central North American prairies to seasonal fire. Journal of Range Management 54:2–10Google Scholar
  21. Engle D. M., M. W. Palmer, J. S. Crockett, R. L. Mitchell, R. Stevens. 2000. Influence of late season fire on early successional vegetation of an Oklahoma prairie. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:135–144Google Scholar
  22. Eviner V. T., F. S. Chapin III. 2003. Functional matrix: A conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annual Review of Ecology and Evolution Systematics 34:455–485Google Scholar
  23. Fuhlendorf S. D., D. M. Engle. 2001. Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: Ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. Bioscience 51:625–632Google Scholar
  24. Fuhlendorf S. D., F. E. Smeins. 1997. Long-term vegetation dynamics mediated by herbivores, weather, and fire in a Juniperus-Quercus savanna. Journal of Vegetation Science 8:819–828Google Scholar
  25. Fuhlendorf S. D., H. Zhang, T. R. Tunnell, D. M. Engle, A. F. Cross. 2002. Effects of grazing on restoration of Southern mixed prairie soils. Restoration Ecology 10:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gee G. W., J. W. Bauder. 1996. Particle size analysis. in D. L. Sparks et al. (eds.). Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. Pages 377–411Google Scholar
  27. Glenn S. M., S. L. Collins, D. J. Gibson. 1992. Disturbances in tall-grass prairie: Local and regional effects on community heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology 7:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodman S. W. 1996. Ecosystem management at the Department of Defense. Ecological Applications 6:706–707Google Scholar
  29. Grantham W. P., E. F. Redente, C. F. Bagley, M. W. Paschke. 2001. Tracked vehicle impacts to vegetation structure and soil erodibility. Journal of Range Management 54:711–716Google Scholar
  30. Hagen C. A., B. E. Jamison, K. M. Giesen, T. Z. Riley. 2004. Guidelines for managing lesser prairie-chicken populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:69–82Google Scholar
  31. Hagan W. T. 1976. United States–Comanche Relations: The reservation years, Yale University Press, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, K. D. 1991. LCTA data summary/progress report, Fort Sill Oklahoma. U.S. Army Corps of Engineering Research Laboratory, Lawton, Oklahoma. Pages 5–13Google Scholar
  33. Havlin J. L., J. D. Beaton, S. L. Tisdale, W. L. Nelson. 1999. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill M. O., H. G. Gauch Jr., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirst R. A., R. F. Pywell, R. H. Marrs, P. D. Putwain. 2003. The resistance of a chalk grassland to disturbance. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:368–379Google Scholar
  36. Hobbs R. J., L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huston M. A. 1994. Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
  38. Knapp A. K., J. M. Blair, J. M. Briggs, S. L. Collins, D. C. Hartnett, L. C. Johnson. 1999. The keystone role of bison in North American tallgrass prairie. Bioscience 49:39–50Google Scholar
  39. Knops J. M. H., D. Tillman. 2000. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81:88–98Google Scholar
  40. Leis, S. A. 2004. Effects of military training on soil, vegetation, and the small mammal community in a mixed prairie. M. S. Thesis. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OklahomaGoogle Scholar
  41. Lipiec J., I. Håkansson. 2000. Influences of degree of compactness and matric water tension on some important plant growth factors. Soil and Tillage Research 53:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mackey R. L., D. J. Currie. 2001. The diversity–disturbance relationship: Is it generally strong and peaked? Ecology 82:3479–3492Google Scholar
  43. Martinsen G. D., J. H. Cushman, T. G. Whitham. 1990. Impact of pocket gopher distrubance on plant species diversity in a short-grass prairie community. Oecologia 83:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McIntyre S., S. Lavorel. 1994. Predicting richness of native, rare, and exotic plants in response to habitat and disturbance variables across a variegated landscape. Conservation biology 8:521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milchunas D. G., W. K. Lauenroth. 1993. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecological Monographs 63:327–366Google Scholar
  46. Milchunas D. G., O. E. Sala, W. K. Lauenroth. 1988. A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. American Naturalist 132:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milchunas D. G., K. A. Schultz, R. B. Shaw. 2000. Plant community structure in relation to long-term disturbance by mechanized military maneuvers in a semiarid region. Environmental Management 25:525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller B. K., G. Ceballos, R. Reading. 1994. The prairie dog and biotic diversity. Conservation Biology 8:677–681Google Scholar
  49. Miller J. R., N. T. Hobbs. 2000. Recreational trails, human activity, and nest predation in lowland riparian areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 50:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mobley H. L., R. C. Brinlee. 1967. Soil survey, Comanche County, Oklahoma. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  51. Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2001. Official soil series descriptions. Soil Survey Division, United States Department of Agriculture. Available at http://www.ortho.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/osd/
  52. Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2004a. National soil information system. National Soil Survey Center, United State Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, Nebraska. Available at http://www.nasis.nrcs.usda.gov
  53. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2004b. The PLANTS database, version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. Available at http://www.plants.usda.gov
  54. Nelson D. W., L. E. Sommers. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In D. L. Sparks (ed.). Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA:5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  55. Nichols J. D. 1984. Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in the Southern Great Plains. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 48:1382–1384Google Scholar
  56. Oklahoma Climatological Survey. 2003. Mesonet data. Oklahoma Climatolocal Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. Available at http://www.ocs.ou.edu
  57. Owensby C. E., K. R. Blan, B. J. Eaton, O. G. Russ. 1973. Evaluation of eastern red cedar infestations in the northern Flint Hills. Journal of Range Management 26:256–260Google Scholar
  58. Peet R. K., R. G. Knox, J. S. Case, R. B. Allen. 1988. Putting things in order: The advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 131:924–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pickett S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso. 1995. Landscape ecology: Spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331–334Google Scholar
  60. Pickett S. T. A., P. S. White (eds.) 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  61. Potter K. N., H. A. Torbert, H. B. Johnson, C. R. Tischler. 1999. Carbon storage after long-term grass establishment on degraded soils. Soil Science 164:718–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Prosser C. W., K. K. Sedivec, W. T. Barker. 2000. Tracked vehicle effects on vegetation and soil characteristics. Journal of Range Management 53:666–670Google Scholar
  63. Samson F., F. Knopf. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–414.Google Scholar
  64. SAS Institute Inc. 2002. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 9.01. SAS Institute Inc., Cary North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  65. Schlesinger W. H., 1986. Changes in soil carbon storage and associated properties with disturbance and recovery. in Trabalka J. R., D. E. Reichle (eds.). The changing carbon cycle: A global analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pages 194–220Google Scholar
  66. Shea K., S. H. Roxburgh, E. S. J. Rauschert. 2004. Moving from pattern to process: Coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecology Letters 7:491–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sims J. T. 1996. Lime requirement. in D. L. Sparks (ed.). Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chemical methods. Society of America, and Agronomic Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. Pages 491–515Google Scholar
  68. Sousa W. P. 1979. Disturbance in marine intertidal boulder fields: The nonequilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology 60:1225–1239Google Scholar
  69. Sparks D. L., 2003. Environmental soil chemistry. 2nd ed. Academic Press, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  70. Steel R. G. D., J. H. Torrie, D. A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  71. Stohlgren T. J., A. J. Owne, M. Lee. 2000. Monitoring shifts in plant diversity in response to climate change: A method for landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:65–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Szabolcs I. 1979. Review of research on salt-affected soils. Natural Resources Research: 15. UNESCO, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  73. ter Braak C. J. F., 1987. Ordination. in R. H. Jongman, C. J. F. ter Braak, O. F. R. van Tongeren (eds.). Data analysis in community ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Pages 91–173Google Scholar
  74. ter Braak C. J. F., P. Šmilauer. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  75. ter Braak C. J. F., P. F. M. Verdonschot. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57:255–289Google Scholar
  76. Thurow T. L., 1991. Hydrology and erosion. in R. K. Heitschmidt, J. W. Stuth (eds.). Grazing management: An ecological perspective. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. Pages 141–144Google Scholar
  77. Thurow T. L., S. D. Warren, D. H. Carlson. 1993. Effects of tracked vehicles on characteristics of a Central Texas Rangeland. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 36:1645–1650Google Scholar
  78. Tiessen H., J. W. B. Stewart, J. R. Bettany. 1982. Cultivation effects on the amounts and concentration of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in grassland soils. Agronomy Journal 74:831–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tunnell S. J., D. M. Engle, E. E. Jorgensen. 2004. Old-field grassland successional dynamics following cessation of chronic disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science 15:431–436Google Scholar
  80. Turner M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tyrl R. J., T. G. Bidwell R. E. Masters. 2002. Field guide to Oklahoma plants. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  82. United States Department of Agriculture. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook no. 60. United States Department of Agriculture, Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  83. Vepraskas M. J., 1994. Plant response mechanisms to soil compaction. in R. E. Wilkinson (ed.). Plant–environment interactions. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Pages 263–287Google Scholar
  84. Vujnovic K., R. W. Wein, M. R. T. Dale. 2002. Predicting plant species diversity in response to disturbance magnitude in grassland remnants of central Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Webb R. H. 1983. Compaction of desert soils by off-road vehicles. in R. H. Webb, H. G. Wilshire (eds.). Environmental effects of off-road vehicles: Impacts and management in arid regions. Springer-Verlag, New York. Pages 51–76Google Scholar
  86. Weltzin J. F., S. Archer, R. K. Heitschmidt. 1997. Small-mammal regulation of vegetation structure in a temperate savanna. Ecology 78:751–763Google Scholar
  87. White R., S. Murray, M. Rohwder. 2000. Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: Grassland ecosystems. World Resources Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  88. Whitecotton R. C. A., M. B. David, R. G. Darmody, D. L. Price. 2000. Impact of foot traffic from military training on soil and vegetation properties. Environmental Management 26:697–706Google Scholar
  89. Wiens J. A., 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385–397Google Scholar
  90. Wilson S. D., 1988. The effects of military tank traffic on prairie: A management tool. Environmental Management 12:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilson S. D., D. Tilman. 2002. Quadratic variation in old-field species richness along gradients of disturbance and nitrogen. Ecology 83:492–504Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherry A. Leis
    • 1
  • David M. Engle
    • 1
  • David M. LeslieJr
    • 2
  • Jeffrey S. Fehmi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil ScienceOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research LaboratoryEcological Processes BranchChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations