Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Physical Sciences in Support of Environmental Management

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Offshore drilling for oil and gas has been conducted since the early 1900s. Oil and gas under the seabed continue to be an important part of the energy resources of the United States. The need to balance the value of these resources against the potential for environmental damage is an important concern. This article explains why and how the Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the US Department of the Interior uses research in physical sciences to help fulfill its environmental goals, and it provides background information on the role of physical sciences in decision-making for Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil, gas, and other minerals development. Established in the 1970s, the MMS’ Environmental Studies Program is a highly focused marine research program designed to provide the environmental information necessary for OCS energy and nonenergy minerals planning and development activities. The physical sciences research supported by MMS includes physical oceanography, oil-spill risk analyses, atmospheric sciences, and sand and gravel studies. Instead of giving a comprehensive review on physical sciences research in MMS, this article presents sample MMS studies and illustrates how these studies are utilized to support decision-making in environmental management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. C. M. Anderson R. P. LaBelle (1994) ArticleTitleComparative occurrence rates for offshore oil spills Spill Science and Technology Bulletin 1(2) 131–141

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. M. Anderson R. P. LaBelle (2001) ArticleTitleUpdate of comparative occurrence rates for offshore oil spills Spill Science and Technology Bulletin 5(5–6 303–321

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. F. Baird (2003) Development of the MMS dredge plume model. Technical Report to the Minerals Management Service W. F. Baird & Associated LTD Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. J. Berger P. Hamilton R. R. Leben G. H. Born C. A. Fox (1996) Louisiana/Texas shelf physical oceanography program: Eddy circulation study. Final synthesis report. Vol. 1, Technical Report. OCS Study MMS 96-0051. US Department of the Interior Gulf of Mexico Region New Orleans, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cicin-Sain, B. (1986) Offshore oil development in California: Challenges to governments and to the public interest. Public Affairs Report, Vol. 27, February–April 1986, Nos. 1 and 2, University of California, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, R. W., Evans, W. E., Würsig, B. (eds) (2000) Cetaceans, sea turtles and seabirds in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Distribution, abundance and habitat associations. Volume I: Executive summary. USGS/BRD/CR-1999-0005. US Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Reston, Virginia; Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, Louisiana. OCS Study MMS 2000-002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. J. Herring M. Inoue G. L. Mellor C. N. K. Moores P. P. Niiler L.-Y. Oey R. C. Patchen F. M. Vukovich W. J. Wiseman SuffixJr. (1999) Technical report. Coastal ocean modelling program for the Gulf of Mexico Dynalysis of Princeton Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z.-G. Ji W. R. Johnson C. F. Marshall G. B. Rainey E. M. Lear (2002a) Oil-spill risk analysis: Gulf of Mexico outer continental shelf (OCS) lease sales, central planning area and western planning area, 2003–2007, and gulfwide OCS program, 2003–2042. OCS Report 2002-032 Minerals Management Service Herndon, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Z.-G. Ji W. R. Johnson C. F. Marshall G. B. Rainey E. M. Lear (2002b) Oil-spill risk analysis: Gulf of Mexico outer continental shelf (OCS) lease sales, eastern planning area, 2003–2007, and gulfwide OCS program, 2003–2042. OCS Report 2002-069 Minerals Management Service Herndon, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ji, Z.-G., Johnson, W. R., Price, J.W., Marshall, C. F. (2003) Oil-spill risk analysis for assessing environmental impacts. In Proceedings of the 2003 international oil spill conference, Vancouver, Canada.

  11. Ji, Z.-G., Johnson, W. R. Marshall, C. F. (2004) Deepwater oil-spill modeling for assessing environmental impacts. In Proceedings of the 2004 oil spill conference, Alicante, Spain.

  12. ØO. Johansen H. Rye A. G. Melbye H. V. Jensen B. Serigstad T. Knutsen (2001) Deep spill JIP—Experimental discharges of gas and oil at Helland Hansen–June 2000. Technical report SINTEF Applied Chemistry Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. P. LaBelle (2001) ArticleTitleOverview of US Minerals Management Service activities in deepwater research Marine Pollution Bulletin 43 256–261 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXotVymtrY%3D Occurrence Handle11760191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. R. P. LaBelle C. M. Anderson (1985) ArticleTitleThe application of oceanography to oil-spill modeling for the outer continental shelf oil and gas leasing program Marine Technology Society Journal 19(2) 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  15. Minerals Management Service (MMS). (2003) Minerals Management Service: Our ocean role. OCS Report 2003-058. Minerals Management Service, Herndon, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Research Council (NCR) (1992) Assessment of the U.S. outer continental shelf environmental studies program, I: Physical oceanography studies. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

  17. R. A. Smith J. R. Slack T. Wyant K. J. Lanfear (1982) The oilspill risk analysis model of the U.S. Geological Survey. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1227 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the following MMS colleagues for their contributions: Robert LaBelle, Dick Wildermann, Jim Cimato, Walter Johnson, Ron Lai, Jim Price, Chip Marshall, Dirk Herkhof, and Barry Drucker at the MMS Headquarters; Elizabeth Pueler, Alexis Lugo-Fernandez, Carole Current, and Chester Huang at the MMS Gulf of Mexico Region; and Cleveland Cowles, Dick Prentki, and Caryn Smith at the MMS Alaska Region. The author would also like to thank James Kendall, who provided valuable guidance and comments that made this article possible, and Eileen Lear, who provided her editing skills.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen-Gang Ji.

Additional information

Published online

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, ZG. Use of Physical Sciences in Support of Environmental Management. Environmental Management 34, 159–169 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0205-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0205-8

Navigation