Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated Wastewater Management Reporting at Tourist Areas for Recycling Purposes, Including the Case Study of Hersonissos, Greece

  • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wastewater treatment facilities in tourist areas, in comparison to other municipal facilities, require specific configurations and additional management actions in order to achieve a reliable and cost-effective treatment. For example, the same facility operates during winter with minimum flows and in summer with peak flows. Moreover, careful effluent management is required to minimize environmental impact and health effects on tourists. In this study, effluent management data, including quantitative and qualitative effluent characteristics, reuse, and economic aspects of the Hersonissos Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP) in Greece, are discussed. It has been designed to treat both municipal wastewater from the Hersonissos Municipality and septage from the wider area. Analysis of effluent quantitative data showed two flow peaks in the summer period and only one in winter. The WTP was found to provide a reliable level of treatment in terms of biochemical oxygen demand (95.9%), total suspended solids (97.2%), and total nitrogen (87.7%) removal, but increased numbers of fecal coliforms were measured at some peak flow periods, suggesting the need for additional management strategies. Effluent is reused mainly for agricultural irrigation; secondary uses include fire protection and landscape irrigation. Economic analysis showed that for each cubic meter treated, the total annual economic cost for treatment, filtration, and reuse infrastructure was 1.07 €, 0.05 €, and 0.08 €, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allen, R., G. Pereira, L. S. Raes, and D. M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome

  • Anderson J. 2003. The environmental benefits of water recycling and reuse. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply3 (4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelakis A. N., L. Bontoux, V. Lazarova. 2003. Challenges and prospectives for water recycling and reuse in EU countries. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 3(4):59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelakis A. N., M. H. Marecos do Monte, L. Bontoux T. Asano. 1999. The status of wastewater reuse practice in the Mediterranean basin. Water Research 33(10):2201–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, R. S., and D. W. Westcot. 1985. Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29, Rev. 1. FAO, Rome

  • Dastane, N. G. 1974. Effective rainfall in agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 25. FAO, Rome

  • Doorendos, J., and W. O. Pruit. 1977. Crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24. FAO, Rome

  • EU. 1986. Council Directive 126/1986 on the protection of the environment and in particular of the soil when sewage sludge is used in agriculture, 86/278/EEC. Official Journal of the European Community No L186/6-12, 4/7/1986

  • EU. 2000. Working Document on Sludge, 3rd draft, ENV.E.3/LM. Available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/waste/sludge/workingdoc3.htm (accessed 17/11/2004)

  • Gerba C. P., J. B. Rose. 2003. International guidelines for water recycling: microbiological considerations. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 3(4):311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden A. 2000. Environment and tourism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent M., R. Newnham, S. Essex. 2002. Tourism and sustainable water supply in Mallorca: A geographical analysis. Applied Geography 22:351–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mara D. 1996. Low cost urban sanitation. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews P., K. H. Lindner. 1996. European Union. in P. Matthews (ed.). A global atlas of wastewater sludge and biosolids use and disposal. IAWQ, London. Pages 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Oron G. 2003. Agriculture, water and the environment: future challenges. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 3(4):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Oron G., Y. DeMalach L. Gillerman, I. David, . Lurie. 2002. Effect of water salinity and irrigation technology on yield and quality of pears. Biosystems Engineering 81:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paranychianakis, N. V., and K. S. Chartzoulakis. 2005. Irrigation of Mediteranean crops with saline water: From plant physiology to management practices. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 106:171–187

  • Region of Crete. 2002. Integrated management of water resources of Crete. Available from http://www. creteregion.gr/greek/fysikoi%20poroi/disa/INTRO.html (accessed November 17, 2004) (in Greek)

  • Salgot M., C. Verges, A. N. Angelakis. 2003. Risk assessment in wastewater recycling and reuse. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 3(4):301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis, K. P. 1999. The treatment of municipal wastewater in Greece. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

  • Tsagarakis K. P., N. Georgantzis. 2003. The role of information on farmers’ willingness to use recycled water for irrigation. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 3(4):105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis K. P., G. E. Dialynas A. N. Angelakis. 2004. Water resources management in Crete (Greece) and proposed quality criteria for use of recycled water in the Mediterranean region. Agricultural Water Management 66(1):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis K. P., D. D. Mara, N. Angelakis. 2001. Wastewater treatment in Greece: Experience and lessons for developing countries. Water Science & Technology 44(6):163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis K. P., D. D. Mara, N. Angelakis. 2003. Application of cost criteria for selection of municipal wastewater treatment systems. Water Air & Soil Pollution 142(1–4):187–210

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1992. Guidelines for water reuse. US Agency for International Development, Technical Report No. EPA/625/R-92/004. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • US EPA. 1998. Water recycling and reuse: The environmental benefits. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available from http://www.epa.gov/region9/water/recycling/

  • WHO. 1989. Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture. WHO Technical Report Series 778. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Mr. D. Papamastorakis, from the Region of Crete, and Mr. M. Koumakis, from the Municipal Enterprise of Water Supply and Sewerage of Iraklio, for providing unpublished data. Finally, thanks are due to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and recommendations concerning the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.P. Tsagarakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borboudaki, K.E., Paranychianakis, N.V. & Tsagarakis, K. Integrated Wastewater Management Reporting at Tourist Areas for Recycling Purposes, Including the Case Study of Hersonissos, Greece. Environmental Management 36, 610–623 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0115-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0115-9

Keywords

Navigation