Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Controls on Nutrients Across a Prairie Stream Watershed: Land Use and Riparian Cover Effects

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nutrient inputs generally are increased by human-induced land use changes and can lead to eutrophication and impairment of surface waters. Understanding the scale at which land use influences nutrient loading is necessary for the development of management practices and policies that improve water quality. The authors assessed the relationships between land use and stream nutrients in a prairie watershed dominated by intermittent stream flow in the first-order higher elevation reaches. Total nitrogen, nitrate, and phosphorus concentrations were greater in tributaries occupying the lower portions of the watershed, closely mirroring the increased density of row crop agriculture from headwaters to lower-elevation alluvial areas. Land cover classified at three spatial scales in each sub-basin above sampling sites (riparian in the entire catchment, catchment land cover, and riparian across the 2 km upstream) was highly correlated with variation in both total nitrogen (r2 = 53%, 52%, and 49%, respectively) and nitrate (r2 = 69%, 65%, and 56%, respectively) concentrations among sites. However, phosphorus concentrations were not significantly associated with riparian or catchment land cover classes at any spatial scale. Separating land use from riparian cover in the entire watershed was difficult, but riparian cover was most closely correlated with in-stream nutrient concentrations. By controlling for land cover, a significant correlation of riparian cover for the 2 km above the sampling site with in-stream nutrient concentrations could be established. Surprisingly, land use in the entire watershed, including small intermittent streams, had a large influence on average downstream water quality although the headwater streams were not flowing for a substantial portion of the year. This suggests that nutrient criteria may not be met only by managing permanently flowing streams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexander R. B., R. A. Smith, G. E. Schwarz. 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allan J. D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35:257–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan J. D., D. L. Erickson, J. Fay. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan J. D., A. S. Flecker. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience 43:32–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameel J. J., R. P. Axler, C. J. Owen. 1993. Persulfate digestion for determination of total nitrogen and phosphorus in low-nutrient waters. American Environmental Laboratory 93:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association (APHA). 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Boulton A. J., P. S. Lake. 1990. The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia: I. Multivariate analyses of physicochemical features. Freshwater Biology 24:123–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buck O., D. K. Niyogi, C. R. Townsend. 2004. Scale-dependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments. Environmental Pollution 130:287–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S. R., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. W. Howarth, A. N. Sharpley, V. H. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8:559–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaha T. A., R. B. Reneau, S. Mostaghimi, D. Lee. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32:513–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W. K. 1997. Distribution of runoff and rivers related to vegetative characteristics, latitude, and slope: A global perspective. Journal of the North American Benthological Society16:162–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W. K. 2003. The misuse of soluble reactive phosphorus and inorganic nitrogen to indicate nutrient status of surface waters. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W. K., K. Gido, M. Whiles, K. Fritz, W. Mathews. 2004. Life on the edge: ecology of Great Plains prairie streams. Bioscience 54:207–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W. K., R. M. Oakes. 2004. A technique for establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds impacted by humans. Limnology and Oceanography Methods 2:333–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W. K., V. H. Smith, K. Lohman. 2002. Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:865–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds W. K., E. B. Welch. 2000. Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:186–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray L.J., W.K. Dodds. 1998. Structure and dynamics of aquatic communities.. In: A. K. Knapp, J. M. Briggs, D. C. Hartnett (eds.) Grassland dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York Pages 177–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray L. J., Macpherson G. L., Koelliker, J. K., W. K. Dodds. 1998. Hydrology and aquatic chemistry. In: A. K. Knapp, J. M. Briggs, D. C. Hartnett (eds.) Grassland dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York, Pages 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding J. S., R. G. Young, J. W. Hayes, K. A. Shearer, J. D. Stark. 1999. Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum. Freshwater Biology 42:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill A. R. 1996. Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Journal of Environmental Quality 25:743–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker C. T., D. A. Levine. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. BioScience 45:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L. B., S. H. Gage. 1997. Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:113–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L. B., C. Richards, G. E. Host, J. W. Arthur. 1997. Landscape influences on water chemistry in midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:193–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S. L., A. P. Covich. 1997. Scales of observation of riparian forests and distributions of suspended detritus in a prairie river. Freshwater Biology 37:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K. B., A. C. Neale, M. S. Nash, R. D. Van Remortel, J. D. Wickham, K. Ritters, R. V. O’Neill. 2001. Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States mid-Atlantic region. Landscape Ecology 16:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansas Applied Remote Sensing (KARS). 1993. Kansas land cover. Kansas Applied Remote Sensing, Lawrence, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr J. R., I. J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land–water interface. Science 201:229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp M. J., W. K. Dodds. 2001. Spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen concentrations in pristine and agriculturally influenced prairie streams. Biogeochemistry 53:125–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R., L. S. Altier, J. D. Newbold, R. R. Schnabel, P. M. Groffman, J. M. Denver, D. L. Correll, J. W. Gilliam, J. L. Robinson, R. B. Brinsfield, K. W. Staver, W. Lucas, A. H. Todd. 1997. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds. Environmental Management 21:687–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R., T. R. Fail Jr., J. Hendrickson Jr., O. Leonard, L. Asmussen. 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience 34:374–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment D. R. (ed.). 2002. Arc hydro: GIS for water resources. ESRI Press, Redlands, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1994. State soil geographic (STATSGO) database for Kansas. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1996. Model national specification for riparian forest buffers. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Watershed Science Institute, Seattle, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2001. Riparian areas inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Salina, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V., H. Olem 1994. Water quality: Prevention, identification, and management of diffuse pollution. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, R. M. 2003. Riparian impacts on water quality in eastern Kansas watersheds. M.S. thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas

  • Osborne L. L., M. J. Wiley. 1988. Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Management 26:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt C. G. 1998. Geomorphology of Konza prairie. In: A. K. Knapp, J. M. Briggs, D. C. Hartnett (eds.) Grassland Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York. Pages 35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn W. T., D. L. Correll. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth N. E., J. D. Allan, D. L. Erickson. 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabater S., A. Butturini, J. Clement, T. Burt, D. Dowrick, M. Hefting, V. Maitre, G. Pinay, C. Postolache, M. Rzepecki, F. Sabater. 2003. Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic gradient: Patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems 6:20–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite F. E. 1941. Synthesis of variance. Psychometrika 6:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sliva L., D. D. Williams. 2001. Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality. Water Research 35:3462–3472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storey R. G., D. R. Cowley. 1997. Recovery of three New Zealand rural streams as they pass through native forest remnants. Hydrobiologia 353:63–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000. National water quality assessment (305-b report). United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, 841-R-02-001, Washington, DC

  • Whiles M. R., B. L. Brock, A. C. Franzen, S. C. Dinsmore. 2000. Stream invertebrate communities, water quality, and land-use patterns in an agricultural drainage basin of northeastern Nebraska, USA. Environmental Management 26:563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dolly Gudder and for technical assistance, and Lucinda Johnson for comments on the manuscript. We thank the USGS Gap program and the Konza NSF LTER program for funding. This is publication 04-260-J from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, 66506, USA

    Walter K. Dodds & Robert M. Oakes

Authors
  1. Walter K. Dodds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert M. Oakes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter K. Dodds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodds, W.K., Oakes, R.M. Controls on Nutrients Across a Prairie Stream Watershed: Land Use and Riparian Cover Effects. Environmental Management 37, 634–646 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0072-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0072-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation