Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Approach for Estimating Soil Carbon Using the National Nutrient Loss Database

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural lands have the potential to contribute to greenhouse gas mitigation by sequestering organic carbon within the soil. Credible and consistent estimates will be necessary to design programs and policies to encourage management practices that increase carbon sequestration. Because a nationwide survey of soil carbon by the wide range of natural resources and management conditions of the United States is prohibitively expensive, a simulation modeling approach must be used. The National Nutrient Loss Database (NNLD) is a modeling and database system designed and built jointly by the USDA– Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Texas A&M University to provide science-based inferences on environmental impacts from changes in agricultural management practices and programs at the regional and national level. Currently, the NNLD simulates 16 crops and covers ∼ 1.35 × 108 ha. For estimating soil carbon sequestration, the database will be populated with ∼ 1.5 × 106 field-level model runs using the EPIC (Environmental Policy Impact Calculator) model, which includes newly incorporated carbon equations consistent with those in the Century model. Each run will represent a unique situation defined by state, crop, climate, soil, irrigation type, conservation practice, tillage system, and nutrient management treatment (nutrient rate, application frequency, application timing, and manure category). Results are to be assigned to specific National Resource Inventory points (NRI) to simulate regional and national baselines. In this article we present the modeling approach and discuss the strengths and limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atwood, J. D., D. W. Goss, R. L. Kellogg, T. A. Pitts, S. R. Potter, and S. Wallace. 2000. The NRCS national nutrient loss modeling project: Preliminary results for corn east of the Rocky Mountains. Draft Report. 3 March 2000.

  2. T. Campbell (2000) ArticleTitleI_EPIC—EPIC model control system for Windows. http://www.public.iastate.edu/∼elvis/i_epic_main.html. Accessed 15 December 2002 . . .

    Google Scholar 

  3. InstitutionalAuthorNameCTIC (2001) Crop Residue Management Surveys, 1987–2000. Data Product, Conservation Technology Information Center, Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. W. Goss J. Sanabria R. L. Kellogg J. L. Berc (2001) A national assessment of soil carbon sequstration on cropland: Description of an analytical approach. Soil carbon sequestration and the greenhouse effect Soil Science Society of America 57. Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. C. Izaurralde J. R. Williams W. B. McGill N. J. Rosenberg (2001) Simulating soil carbon dynamics, erosion and tillage with EPIC . . (Eds) First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, 14–17 May 2001 . Washington, DC .

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. L. Kellogg M. S. Maizel D. W. Goss (1992) Agricultural chemical use and ground water quality: Where are the potential problem areas? US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service/Economic Research Service/Cooperative State Research Service, and the National Center for Resource Innovations Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. L. Kellogg D. W. Goss J. Sanabria (1996) Core analysis to support national resource assessment Natural Resource Conservation Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. L. Kellogg C. H. Lander D. C. Moffitt N. Gollehon (2000) Manure nutrients relative to the capacity of cropland and pastureland to assimilate nutrients: Spatial and temporal trends for the United States US Department of Agriculture–Natural Resource Conservation Service and Economics Research Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Lal J. M. Kimble R. F. Follett C. V. Cole (1999, 128 pp) The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. M. Nusser J. J. Goebel (1997) ArticleTitleThe National Resources Inventory: A long-term multi-resource monitoring programme Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4 181–204 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018574412308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. R. Potter J. D. Atwood D. W. Goss (2001) Modeling regional and national non-point source impacts from US agriculture. ASAE Meeting Paper No.: 01-12191 American Society of Agricultural Engineers St. Joseph, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  12. Putman, J. W., and P. T. Dyke. 1987. The erosion-productivity impact calculator as formulated for the resource conservation act appraisal. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Staff Report AGES861204.

  13. J. W. Putman J. R. Williams D. Sawyer (1988) ArticleTitleUsing the erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model to estimate the impact of soil erosion for the 1985 RCA appraisal Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43(4) 321–326

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Sanabria D. W. Goss (1997) Construction of input for environmental simulation models using multivariate analysis T. Winn (Eds) Proceedings of the Seventh Annual South-Central Regional SAS Users Conference . Houston, Texas 9–11, November

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. H. Schlesinger J. A. Andrews (2000) ArticleTitleSoil respiration and the global carbon cycle Biogeochemistry 48 7–20 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006247623877 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXitVOjsr8%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. R. Seaber F. P. Kapinos G. L. Knapp (1987) Hydrologic unit maps. Water-Supply Paper 2294 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sharpley, A. N., and J. R. Williams. 1990. EPIC–Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model documentation. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1768, 235 pp.

  18. InstitutionalAuthorNameUSDA (1989) The second RCA appraisal. Soil, water, and related resources on nonfederal land in the United States. Analysis of condition and trends US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. InstitutionalAuthorNameUSDA (2000a) Cropping practice surveys, 1990–1995. Electronic data products, stock Nos. 93018a to 93018f US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. USDA. 2000b. The National Resource Inventory (NRI), 1997. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC. Web site for data access and published reports:http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/NRI/1997/.

  21. InstitutionalAuthorNameUSDA (2001a) Interim appraisal and analysis of conservation alternatives. A Resources Conservation Act report US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  22. USDA. 2001b. Census of Agriculture. US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. Online database at http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/.

  23. J. R. Williams (1995) The EPIC model V. P. Singh (Eds) Computer models of watershed hydrology Water Resources Publications Highlands Ranch, Colorado Pages 909–1000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Todd Campbell with the Center for Agriculture and Rural Development, Iowa State University for his development of the i_EPIC software, and Theresa Pitts at Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station for her development of the RunBuilder software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R. Potter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potter, S., Atwood, J., Kellogg, R. et al. An Approach for Estimating Soil Carbon Using the National Nutrient Loss Database . Environmental Management 33, 496–506 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9107-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-9107-4

Keywords

Navigation