Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Evaluation of Vernal Pool Creation Projects in New England: Project Documentation from 1991–2000

  • Environmental Assessment
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vernal pools are vulnerable to loss through development and agricultural and forestry practices owing to their isolation from open water bodies and their small size. Some vernal pool-dependent species are already listed in New England as Endangered, Threatened, or Species of Special Concern. Vernal pool creation is becoming more common in compensatory mitigation as open water ponds, in general, may be easier to create than wooded wetlands. However, research on vernal pool creation is limited. A recent National Research Council study (2001) cites vernal pools as “challenging to recreate.” We reviewed documentation on 15 vernal pool creation projects in New England that were required by federal regulatory action. Our purpose was to determine whether vernal pool creation for compensatory mitigation in New England replaced key vernal pool functions by assessing project goals and documentation (including mitigation plans, pool design criteria, monitoring protocols, and performance standards). Our results indicate that creation attempts often fail to replicate lost pool functions. Pool design specifications are often based on conjecture rather than on reference wetlands or created pools that function successfully. Project monitoring lacks consistency and reliability, and record keeping by regulatory agencies is inadequate. Strengthening of protection of isolated wetlands in general, and standardization across all aspects of vernal pool creation, is needed to ensure success and to promote conservation of the long-term landscape functions of vernal pools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. A. Alford S. J. Richards (1999) ArticleTitleGlobal amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30 133–165

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Antonelli (1997) ArticleTitleThe use of shallow groundwater wells to obtain hydrologic data for wetland delineation. Wetland Journal 9 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • K. J. Babbitt K. W. Tanner (2000) ArticleTitleUse of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape. Wetlands 20 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • K. A. Berven T. A. Grudzien (1990) ArticleTitleDispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): Implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44 2047–2056

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Bonner W. J. Diehl R. Altig (1997) ArticleTitlePhysical, chemical and biological dynamics of five temporary dystrophic forest pools in central Mississippi. Hydrobiologia 353 77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Breaux R. Serefiddin (1999) ArticleTitleValidity of performance criteria and a tentative model for regulatory use in compensatory wetland mitigation permitting. Environmental Management 24 327–336

    Google Scholar 

  • M. M. Brinson R. Rheinhardt (1996) ArticleTitleThe role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • R. T. Brooks J. Stone P. Lyons (1998) ArticleTitleAn inventory of seasonal forest ponds on the Quabbin Reservoir watershed, Massachusetts. Northeastern Naturalist 5 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Brown P. Veneman (1998) Compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Butterwick (1996) The hydrogeomorphic approach and its use in vernal pool functional assessment. C. W. Witham E. T. Bauder D. Belk W. R. Ferren SuffixJr. R. Ornduff (Eds) Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceeding from a 1996 Conference California Native Plant Society Sacramento, CA 50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K., and M. W. Klemens. 2002. Best development practices for conserving pool-breeding amphibians. Wildlife Conservation Society Technical Paper #5. Wildlife Conservation Society, Rye, New York

  • A. J. K. Calhoun M. L. Hunter (2003) Managing ecosystems for amphibian populations. R. D. Semlitsch (Eds) Amphibian conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, D.C. 228–241

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. K. Calhoun T. Walls M. McCollough S. Stockwell (2003) ArticleTitleDeveloping conservation strategies for vernal pools: a Maine case study. Wetlands 23 70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Carey N. Cohen L. Rollins-Smith (1999) ArticleTitleAmphibian declines: an immunological perspective. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 23 459–472

    Google Scholar 

  • De Weese, J. 2000. Vernal pool construction monitoring protocol and habitat replacement evaluation: Pacific region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (URL: www.rl.fws.gov/es/vpfinal.html)

  • C. K. Dodd SuffixJr. B. S. Cade (1998) ArticleTitleMovement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands. Conservation Biology 12 331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • W. E. Duellman L. Trueb (1986) Biology of amphibians McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • C. H. Ernst R. W. Barbour (1989) Snakes of eastern North America George Mason University Press Fairfax, Va

    Google Scholar 

  • W. F. Fagan (1999) ArticleTitleWeak influences of initial conditions on metapopulation persistence times. Ecological Applications 9 1430–1438

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, J. D., J. S. Williams, and P. J. Redman (eds.) 1996. National water summary on wetland resources. USGS Water Supply Paper 2425, USGS Information Services, Denver, CO

  • S. M. Galatowitsch A. G. van der Valk (1996) ArticleTitleCharacteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16 75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Gibbs (2000) ArticleTitleWetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 14 314–317

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Hanski M. E. Gilpin (1991) ArticleTitleMetapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Joyal M. McCollough M. L. Hunter SuffixJr. (2001) ArticleTitleLandscape ecology approaches to wetland species conservation: a case study of two turtle species in southern Maine. Conservation Biology 15 1755–1762

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusler, J. A. 2001. The SWANCC decision and state regulation of wetlands. Association of State Wetland Managers, Inc. (url: http://www.aswm.org/swancc/aswm-int.pdf)

  • J. A. Kusler M. E. Kentula (1990) Executive summary. J. A. Kusler M. E. Kentula (Eds) Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science Island Press Washington, D.C. xvii–xxv

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lannoo J. K. Lang T. Waltz G. S. Phillips (1994) ArticleTitleAn altered amphibian assemblage: Dickenson County, Iowa, 70 years after Frank Blanchard’s survey. American Midland Naturalist 131 311–319

    Google Scholar 

  • B. C. Lubow (1996) ArticleTitleOptimal translocation strategies for enhancing stochastic metapopulation viability. Ecological Applications 6 1268–1280

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Marsh P. C. Trenham (2001) ArticleTitleMetapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Mitsch R. F. Wilson (1996) ArticleTitleImproving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications 6 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Mitsch X. Wu R. W. Nairn P. E. Weihe N. Wang R. Deal C. E. Boucher (1998) ArticleTitleCreating and restoring wetlands. BioScience 48 1019–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act National Academy Press Washington, D.C. 322

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Wetlands Policy Forum (1988) Protecting American’s wetlands: an action agenda Conservation Foundation Washington, D.C. 69

    Google Scholar 

  • J. H. K. Pechmann H. M. Wilbur (1994) ArticleTitlePutting declining amphibian populations in perspective: natural fluctuations and human impacts. Herpetologica 50 65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • J. H. K. Pechmann R. A. Estes D. E. Scott J. W. Gibbons (2001) ArticleTitleAmphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland loss. Wetlands 21 93–111

    Google Scholar 

  • S. E. Pope L. Fahrig H. G. Merriam (2000) ArticleTitleLandscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81 2498–2508

    Google Scholar 

  • F. H. Pough (1983) Amphibians and reptiles as low-energy systems. W. P. Aspey S. I. Lustick (Eds) Behavior energetics: the cost of survival in vertebrates. Ohio State University Press Columbus, OH 141–188

    Google Scholar 

  • E. L. Preisser J. Y. Kefer J. D. Lawrence T. W. Clark (2000) ArticleTitleVernal pool conservation in Connecticut: an assessment and recommendations. Environmental Management 26 503–513

    Google Scholar 

  • K. O. Richter (1997) Criteria for the restoration and creation of wetland habitats of lentic-breeding amphibians of the Pacific Northwest. K. B. Macdonald F. Weinmann (Eds) Wetland and riparian restoration: Taking a broader view. Contributed papers and selected abstracts, Society for Ecological Restoration, 1995 International Conference, September 14-16, 1995 University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA 72–94

    Google Scholar 

  • K. O. Richter A. L. Azous (1995) ArticleTitleAmphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin. Wetlands 15 305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • C. L. Rowe W. A. Dunson (1995) ArticleTitleImpacts of hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds of Central Pennsylvania, USA. Oecologia 102 397–403

    Google Scholar 

  • O. E. Sala (2000) ArticleTitleGlobal biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287 1770–1774

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Semlitsch (1998) ArticleTitleBiological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond-breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology 12 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Semlitsch (2002) ArticleTitleCritical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conservation Biology 16 619–629

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Semlitsch J. R. Bodie (1998) ArticleTitleAre small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12 1129–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Seigel C. K. Dodd SuffixJr. (2002) ArticleTitleTranslocations of amphibians: Proven management method or experimental technique? Conservation Biology 16 552–553

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Snodgrass M. J. Komoroski A. L. Bryan SuffixJr. J. Burger (2000) ArticleTitleRelationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14 414–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2001 WL 15333 (Sup. Ct., 2001)

  • P. C. Trenham D. M. Marsh (2002) ArticleTitleAmphibian translocation programs: Reply to Seigel and Dodd. Conservation Biology 16 555–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. S. 1992. Vernal pools in Massachusetts: Aerial photographic identification, biological and physiographic characteristics, and state certification criteria. Master’s Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Memorandum of Agreement Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army concerning the determination of mitigation under the Clean Water Act Section 404 (b)(1) Guidelines. Washington, DC

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District. April 1, 2002 Checklist for review of mitigation plan with accompanying introduction: performance guidelines and supplemental information on the checklist for review of mitigation plan

  • H. M. Wilbur (1980) ArticleTitleComplex life cycles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11 67–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Windmiller, B. S. 1996. The pond, the forest, and the city: Spotted salamander ecology and conservation in a human-dominated landscape. Ph. D. Dissertation. Tufts University, Medford, MA

  • R. B. Winston (1997) ArticleTitleProblems associated with reliably designing groundwater-dominated constructed wetlands. Wetland Journal 9 21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Wyman (1998) ArticleTitleExperimental assessment of salamanders as predators of detrital food webs: effects on invertebrates, decomposition and the carbon cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation 7 641–650

    Google Scholar 

  • B. E. Young K. R. Lips J. K. Reaser R. Ibanez A. W. Salas J. R. Cedeno et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAmphibian conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology 15 1213–1223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ruth Ladd of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and Wende Mahaney of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service for their comments, ideas and assistance throughout the project. Appreciation also goes out to the many individuals at the state agencies across New England for their help in locating project files. Thanks also to Steve Pelletier and Sarah Allen for their guidance. Thoughtful reviews of the manuscript were provided by Betsy Colburn, Jon Kusler, Ruth Ladd, and Sharon Tisher. This is Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Paper #2631.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aram J. K. Calhoun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lichko, L., Calhoun, A. An Evaluation of Vernal Pool Creation Projects in New England: Project Documentation from 1991–2000 . Environmental Management 32, 141–151 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2967-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2967-9

Keywords

Navigation