Skip to main content

Allocation of River Flows for Restoration of Floodplain Forest Ecosystems: A Review of Approaches and Their Applicability in Europe

Abstract

Floodplain forests are flood-dependent ecosystems. They rely on well-timed, periodic floods for the provision of regeneration sites and on tapered flood recession curves for the successful establishment of seedlings. These overbank flood events are described as “regeneration flows.” Once floodplain forest trees are established, in order to grow they also require adequate, although variable, river stage levels or “maintenance flows” throughout the year. Regeneration flows are often synonymous with flood flows and only occur periodically. There is a disparity between this need for varied interannual flows over the decadal time frame and the usual annual cycle of flow management currently used by most river management agencies. Maintenance flows are often closer to established minimum flows and much easier to provide by current operational practices.A number of environmental flow methodologies, developed in North America, Australia, and South Africa are described in this review. They include the needs of the floodplain environment in the management and allocation of river flows. In North America, these methodologies have been put into practice in a number of river basins specifically to restore floodplain forest ecosystems. In Australia and South Africa, a series of related “holistic approaches” have been developed that include the needs of floodplain ecosystems as well as in-channel ecosystems. In most European countries, restoration of floodplain forests takes place at a few localized restoration sites, more often as part of a flood-defense scheme and usually not coordinated with flow allocation decisions throughout the river basin. The potential to apply existing environmental flow methodologies to the management of European floodplain forests is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

References

  1. Acreman, M. C., and Adams B. 1998. Lowflows, groundwater and wetland interactions. Report to Environment Agency (WC-013) UKWIR (98/WR/09/1) and NERC 9BGS WD/98/11).

  2. E. D. Andrews J. M. Nankervis (1995) Effective discharges and the design of channel maintenance flows for gravel -bed rivers. J. E. Costa A. J. Miller K. W. Potter P. R. Wilcock (Eds) Natural and anthropogenic influences in fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union geophysical monograph 89, American Geophysical Union Washington, DC. 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arthington, A. H. 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Holistic methodologies. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 26/98, 46 pp.

  4. A. H. Arthington B. J. Pusey (1993) ArticleTitleIn-stream flow management in Australia: methods, deficiencies and future directions. Australian Biologist 6 52–60

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arthington, A. H., and Pusey B. J. 2003. Flow restoration and protection in Australian river. River Research and Applications (in press).

  6. Arthington, A. H., and Zalucki J. M. (eds.) 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of methods. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 27/98, 141 pp.

  7. A. H. Arthington J. M. King J. H. O’Keeffe S. E. Bunn J. A. Day B. J. Pusey D. R. Bluhdorn R. Tharme (1992) Development of an holistic approach for assessing environmental flow requirements of riverine ecosystems.Pages 69–76 J. J. Pigram B. P. Hooper (Eds) Water allocation for the environment. Proceedings of an International seminar and workshop at The Centre for Water Policy Research, University of New England Armidale, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arthington, A. A. H., Brizga S. O., and Kennard M. J. 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Best Practice Framework. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 25/98, 26 pp.

  9. A. H. Arthington S. O. Brizga S. C. Choy M. J. Kennard S. J. Mackay R. O. Cosker J. L. Ruffini J. M. Zalucki (2000) Environmental flow requirements of the Brisbane River downstream from Wivenhoe Dam South East Queensland Water Corporation Ltd. and Centre for Catchment and In-stream Research, Griffith University Brisbane, Australia 539

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barsoum, N., and Hughes F. M. R.1998. Regeneration response of black poplar to changing river levels. Pages 397–412 in Hydrology in a changing environment, Volume 1. British Hydrological Society and Wiley, Chichester, UK.

  11. P. B. Bayley (1995) ArticleTitleUnderstanding larger river-floodplain ecosystems. Bioscience 45 153–158

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. T. Bednarek (2001) ArticleTitleUndamming rivers: a review of the ecological impact of dam removal. Environmental Management 27 803–814

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bovee, K. D. 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 12. US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC, FWS/OBS-82/26.

  14. L. J. Bren (1991) ArticleTitleModelling the influence of River Murray management on the Barmah River redgum forests. Australian Forestry 54 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. M. Brinson (1990) Riverine forests. A. Lugo M. M. Brinson S. Brown (Eds) Forested wetlands. Elsevier New York 87–141

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brizga, S. O. 1998. Methods addressing flow requirements for geomorphological purposes. Pages 8–46 in A. H. Arthington, and J. M. Zalucki (eds.), Comparative evaluation of environmental flow assessment techniques: review of methods. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 27/98, 141 pp.

  17. Brizga, S. O. 2000. Burnett River water allocation management plan: proposed environmental flow performance measures: Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane, Australia, 2 volumes.

  18. C. Bruwer C. Poultney Z. Nyathi (1996) Community based hydrological management of the Phongolo floodplain. M. C. Acreman G. E. Hollis (Eds) Water management and wetlands in sub-Saharan Africa. IUCN, Gland Switzerland 199–211

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Bullock A. Gustard (1992) Application of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology to assess ecological flow requirements in a British lowland river. P. A. Carling G. E. Petts (Eds) Lowland floodplain river: geomorphological perspectives. Wiley Chichester, UK 252–277

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. E. Bunn N. R. Loneragan (1998) River flows and estuarine ecosystems. A. H. Arthington J. M. Zalucki (Eds) Environmental flow requirements of the Brisbane River downstream from Wivenhoe Dam. Centre for Catchment and In-stream Research Brisbane 461–482

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. J. R. Cals R. Postma A. D. Buijse E. C. L. Marteijn (1998) ArticleTitleHabitat Restoration along the River Rhine in the Netherlands: putting ideas into practice. Aquatic Conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. D. Cordes F. M. R. Hughes M. Getty (1997) ArticleTitleContemporary and historical factors affecting the regeneration and distribution of riparian woodlands along a northern prairie river; the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Biogeography 24 675–695

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Jong, J., Van Rooy P. T. J. C., and Hosper S. H. 1994. Living with water: At the crossroads of change. Pages 477–491 in Proceedings of the international conference on integrated water resources management, 26–29 September. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  24. H. Décamps (1993) ArticleTitleRiver margins and environmental change. Ecological Applications 3 441–445

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Décamps (1996) ArticleTitleThe renewal of floodplain forests along rivers: a landscape perspective. Vereiningung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 26 35–59

    Google Scholar 

  26. EU. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. The European Parliament, Belgium.

  27. E. H. Franz F. A. azzaz (1977) ArticleTitleSimulation of vegetation response to modified hydrologic regimes: a probabilistic model based on niche differentiation in a floodplain forest. Ecology 58 176–183

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Gan J. McMahon (1990) ArticleTitleVariability of results from the use of PHABSIM in estimating habitat area. Regulated Rivers. Research and Management 5 233–239

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Gopal W. J. Junk J. A. Davis (2001) Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation, volume 2. Backhuys Publishers Leiden, The Netherlands 311

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. A. Gore J. B. Layzer I. A. Russell (1992) Non-traditional applications of instream flow techniques for conserving habitat of biota in the Sabie River of Southern Africa. P. J. Boon P. Calow G. E. Petts (Eds) River conservation and management. Wiley Chichester, UK 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. A. Gore J. B. Layzer J. Mead (2001) ArticleTitleMacroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: a role in stream management and restoration. Regulated Rivers. Research and Management 17 527–542

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gregory, S. V., Hulse D. W., Landers, D. H., and Whitelaw E. 1998. Integration of biophysical and socioeconomic patterns in riparian restoration of large rivers. Pages 231–247 in Hydrology in a changing environment, volume 1, British Hydrological Society and Wiley, Chichester, UK.

  33. A. M. Gurnell (1995) Vegetation along river corridors: Hydrogeomorphological interactions. A.M. Gurnell G.E. Petts (Eds) Changing river channels. Wiley Chichester, UK 237–260

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. Hager H. Schume (2001) The floodplain forests along the Austrian Danube. Pages 83– 100 E. Klimo H. Hager (Eds) The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. Haraszthy (2001) The floodplain forests in Hungary. Pages 17–24 E. Klimo H. Hager (Eds) The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Hill W. S. Platts R. L. Beschta (1991) ArticleTitleEcological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out-of-channel flow requirements. Rivers 2 198–210

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. E. Horton (1945) ArticleTitleErosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrological approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56 275–370

    Google Scholar 

  38. Howard, G. W., and Williams G. J. (eds.). 1982. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Environment and Change: the consequences of the hydroelectric power development on the utilization of the Kafue Flats, Lusaka, April, 1978, Kafue Basin Research Committee, University of Zambia, Lusaka.

  39. F. M. R. Hughes (1997) ArticleTitleFloodplain biogeomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography 21 501–529

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hughes, F. M. R. 2002. Can we manage rivers to benefit alluvial woodlands? Pages 187–196 in B.C. van Dam and S. Bordacs (eds.), Genetic diversity in river populations of European Black Poplar: Implications for riparian ecosystem management. Proceedings of an international symposium, 16–20 May 2001. Szekszard, Hungary.

  41. F. M. R. Hughes S. B. Rood (2001) Floodplains. A. Warren J.R. French (Eds) Habitat conservation: managing the physical environment. Wiley Chichester, UK 105–122

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. M. R. Hughes W. M. Adams E. Muller C. Nilsson K. S. Richards N. Barsoum H. Decamps R. Foussadier J. Girel H. Guilloy A. Hayes M. Johansson L. Lambs G. Pautou J.-L. Peiry M. Perrow F. Vautier M. Winfield (2001) ArticleTitleThe importance of different scale processes for the restoration of floodplain woodlands. Regulated Rivers. Research and Management 17 325–345

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. R. Irwin M. C. Freeman (2002) ArticleTitleProposal for Adaptive Management to conserve biotic integrity in a regulated segment of the Tallapoosa River, Alabama, USA. The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 16 1212–1222

    Google Scholar 

  44. L. R. Jahn (1990) ArticleTitleManaging riverine values and uses. Rivers 1 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  45. W. C. Johnson (1992) ArticleTitleDams and riparian forests: case study from the Upper Missouri River. Rivers 3 229–242

    Google Scholar 

  46. W. J. Junk R. Welcomme (1990) Floodplains. B. C. Patten (Eds) Wetlands and shallow continental water bodies, volume 1. SPB Academic Publishing The Hague 491–524

    Google Scholar 

  47. P. C. Kangas (1990) Long-term development of forested wetlands. A. Lugo M. M. Brinson S. Brown (Eds) Forested wetlands. Elsevier New York 25–51

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kern, K., and Zinke A. 2000. Rehabilitation of the Danube in the reach affected by the hydropower system of Gabcikovo. Pages 130–139 in G. Kovacs (ed.), Proceedings of the international symposium for living rivers: river rehabilitation of international waterways, 21 January 2000. Budapest, Hungary.

  49. Kerr, G., and Nisbet T. R. 1996. The restoration of floodplain woodlands in lowland Britain. Environment Agency Research and Development Technical Report W15, 28 pp.

  50. J. M. King D. Louw (1998) ArticleTitleInstream flow assessment for regulated rivers in South Africa using the building block methodology. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 1 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  51. King, J. M., and Tharme R. E. 1994. Assessment of the instream flow incremental methodology and initial development of alternative instream flow methodologies for South Africa. Water Research Commission Report No 295/1/94.

  52. King, J. M., Brown C., and Sabat H. 2003. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications (in press).

  53. Klimo, E. 2001. The floodplain forests Ecosystems in Southern Moravia, Czech Republic, Pages 25–36 in Klimo & Hager 2001.

  54. Klimo, E., and Hager H. (eds.). 2001. The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, and European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10.

  55. G. M. Kondolf (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of flushing flows for channel restoration on Rush Creek, California. Rivers 6 183–193

    Google Scholar 

  56. G. M. Kondolf P. R. Wilcock (1996) ArticleTitleThe flushing flow problem: Defining and evaluating objectives. Water Resources Research 32 2589–2599

    Google Scholar 

  57. Latham, J., and Kirby K. 1998. Wet woodland: a habitat action plan. UK English Nature, 6 pp.

  58. N. R. Loneragan S. E. Bunn (1999) ArticleTitleRiver flows and estuarine ecosystems: implications for coastal fisheries from a review and a case study of the Logan River, southeast Queensland. Australian Journal of Ecology 24 431–440

    Google Scholar 

  59. C. M. Lorenz A. Gilbert W. P. Cofino (2001) ArticleTitleEnvironmental auditing: indicators for transboundary river management. Environmental Management 28 115–129

    Google Scholar 

  60. I. P. Maddock M. A. Bickerton R. Spence. T. Pickering (2001) ArticleTitleReallocation of compensation releases to restore river flows and improve instream habitat availability in the Upper Derwent catchment, Derbyshire, UK. Regulated Rivers. Research and Management 17 417–441

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. M. Mahoney S. B. Rood (1992) ArticleTitleResponse of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Management 54 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. M. Mahoney S. B. Rood (1998) ArticleTitleStreamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment-an integrative model. Wetlands 18 634–645

    Google Scholar 

  63. G. P. Malanson (1993) Riparian landscapes. Cambridge University Press Cambridge 296

    Google Scholar 

  64. T. Marsh A. Black M. Acreman C. Elliot (2000) River Flows. Pages 101–133 M. Acreman (Eds) The hydrology of the UK: a study of change. in association with the British Hydrological Society Routledge, London 101–133

    Google Scholar 

  65. W. J. Mitsch J. G. Gosselink (1993) Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold New York

    Google Scholar 

  66. B. P. Moon A. W. Van Niekirk G. L. Heritage K. H. Rogers C. S. James (1996) ArticleTitleA geomorphological approach to the management of rivers in the Kruger National Park: the case of the Sabie River. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  67. Moss, T. 2001. Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU Water Framework Directive. Discussion paper 3, Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner, Germany, 11 pp.

  68. Murray Water Entitlement Committee. 1997. Sharing the Murray: proposal for defining people’s entitlements to Victoria’s water from the Murray. 53 pp.

  69. R. J. Naiman H. Décamps (1997) ArticleTitleThe ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 28 621–658

    Google Scholar 

  70. R. J. Naiman S. E. Bunn C. Nilsson G. E. Petts G. Pinay L. C. Thompson (2002) ArticleTitleLegitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environmental Management 30 455–467

    Google Scholar 

  71. G. C. Nanson J. C. Croke (1992) ArticleTitleA genetic classification of floodplains. Geomorphology 4 459–486

    Google Scholar 

  72. C. Nilsson G. Grelsson M. Dynesius M. Johanssen U. Sperens (1991) ArticleTitleSmall rivers behave like large rivers: effects of postglacial history on plant species richness along riverbanks. Journal of Biogeography 18 533–541

    Google Scholar 

  73. L. Pearlstein H. McKellar W. Kitchens (1985) ArticleTitleModelling the impacts of a river diversion on bottomland forest communities in the Santee River floodplain, South Carolina. Ecological Modelling 29 283–302

    Google Scholar 

  74. R. C. Petersen L. B.-M. Petersen J. Lacoursiere (1992) A building block model for stream restoration. Pages 293–310 P. J. Boon P. Calow G. E. Petts (Eds) River Conservation and Management. Wiley, Chichester UK

    Google Scholar 

  75. N. E. Pettit R. H. Froend R. H. Davies (2001) ArticleTitleIdentifying the natural flow regime and the relationship with riparian vegetation for two contrasting Western Australian rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17 201–215

    Google Scholar 

  76. R. L. Phipps (1979) ArticleTitleSimulation of wetlands forest vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 7 257–288

    Google Scholar 

  77. N. L. Poff J. D. Allan M. B. Bain J. R. Karr K. I. Prestegaard B. D. Richter R. E. Sparks J. C. Stromberg (1997) ArticleTitleThe Natural Flow Regime. Bioscience 47 769–784

    Google Scholar 

  78. J. T. Puckeridge K. F. Walker J. F. Costelloe (2000) ArticleTitleHydrological persistence and the ecology of dryland rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16 385–402

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. Puhakka R. Kalliola M. Rajasilta J. Salo (1992) ArticleTitleRiver types, site evolution and successional vegetation patterns in Peruvian Amazonia. Journal of Biogeography 19 651–665

    Google Scholar 

  80. B. J. Pusey A. H. Arthington M. G. Read (1998) ArticleTitleFreshwater fishes of the Burdekin River, Australia: biogeography, history and spatial variation in assemblage structure. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53 303–318

    Google Scholar 

  81. M. A. Reid J. J. Brooks (2000) ArticleTitleDetecting effects of environmental water allocation in wetlands of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16 479–496

    Google Scholar 

  82. D. W. Reiser M. P. Ramey T. A. Wasche (1989) Flushing flows. Pages91–135 J. A. Gore G. E. Petts (Eds) Alternatives in Regulated River Management. CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  83. S. B. Rood J. M. Mahoney (1990) ArticleTitleThe collapse of river valley forests downstream from dams in the western prairies: probable causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management 14 451–464

    Google Scholar 

  84. S. B. Rood J. M. Mahoney (2000) ArticleTitleRevised Instream flow regulation enables cottonwood recruitment along the St. Mary River, Alberta, Canada. Rivers 7 109–125

    Google Scholar 

  85. S. B. Rood J. M. Mahoney D. Reid L. Zilm (1995) ArticleTitleInstream flows and the decline of riparian cottonwoods along the St. Mary River, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 73 1250–1260

    Google Scholar 

  86. S. B. Rood A. R. Kalischuk J. M. Mahoney (1998) ArticleTitleInitial cottonwood seedling recruitment following the flood of the century along the Oldman River, Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 18 557–570

    Google Scholar 

  87. Rood S. B., Gourley C., Ammon E. M., Heki L. G., Klotz J. R., Morrison M. L., Mosley D., Scoppettone G. G., Swanson S., Wagner P. L. 2003. Flows for floodplain forests: successful riparian restoration along the lower Truckee River, Nevada, USA. BioScience (in press).

  88. D. L Rosgen H. L. Silvey J. P. Potyondy (1986) ArticleTitleThe use of channel maintenance flow concepts in the forest service. Hydrological Sciences and Technology 2 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  89. J. M. Schaefer M. T. Brown (1992) ArticleTitleDesigning and protecting river corridors for wildlife. Rivers 3 14–26

    Google Scholar 

  90. T. Scudder (1991) ArticleTitleThe need and justification for maintaining transboundary flood regimes: the African case. Natural Resources Journal 32 75–107

    Google Scholar 

  91. T. Scudder M. C. Acreman (1996) Water management for the conservation of the Kafue wetlands, Zambia and the practicalities of artificial flood releases. Pages 101–106 M. C. Acreman G. E. Hollis (Eds) Water management and wetlands in sub-Saharan Africa IUCN Gland Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  92. C. A. Segelquist M. L. Scott G. T. Auble (1993) ArticleTitleEstablishment of Populus deltoides under simulated alluvial groundwater declines. American Midland Naturalist 130 274–285

    Google Scholar 

  93. P. B. Shafroth G. T. Auble M. L. Scott (1995) ArticleTitleGermination and establishment of the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall subsp. monilifera) and the exotic Russian olive (Eleagnus angustifolia L.). Conservation Biology 9 1169–1175

    Google Scholar 

  94. P. B. Shafroth G. T. Auble J. C. Stromberg D. T. Patten (1998) ArticleTitleEstablishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18 577–590

    Google Scholar 

  95. A. A. Sher D. L. Marshall S. A. Gilbert (2000) ArticleTitleCompetition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conservation Biology 14 1744–1754

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sienkiewicz J., Kloss M., Grzyb M. 2001. The Floodplain Forests Ecosystems in Poland. Pages 249–267 in E. Klimo and H. Hager (eds.), The Floodplain Forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, and European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10.

  97. Z. Somogyi I. Szabados G. Vesperdi (1999) ArticleTitleGrowth and health of floodplain forests in the Szigetkoz (N-W Hungary) before and after diversion of the Danube: results of a ten-year monitoring. Ekologia 18 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  98. C. Stalnaker B. L. Lamb J. Henriksen K. Bovee J. Bartholow (1995) The instream flow incremental methodology. A primer for IFIM. Biological report 29. National Biological Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  99. Stevens, L. E., and Waring G. L. 1985. The effects of prolonged flooding on the riparian plant community in Grand Canyon. Pages 81–86 in Riparian ecosystems and their management—reconciling conflicting uses. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-120, Washington, DC.

  100. J. C. Stromberg D. T. Patten (1990) ArticleTitleRiparian vegetation instream flow requirements: a case study from a diverted stream in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environmental Management 14 185–194

    Google Scholar 

  101. J. C. Stromberg D. T. Patten (1991) ArticleTitleInstream flow requirements for cottonwoods at Bishop Creek, Inyo County, California. Rivers 2 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  102. J. C. Stromberg R. Tiller B. Richter (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: the San Pedro, Arizona. Ecological Applications 6 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  103. S. Swales J. H. Harris (1995) The Expert Panel Assessment Method (EPAM): a new tool for determining environmental flows in regulated rivers. D.M. Harper A.J.D. Ferguson (Eds) The ecological basis for river management. Wiley and Sons Chichester, UK 125–134

    Google Scholar 

  104. E Tabacchi A. M. Planty-Tabacchi M. J. Salinas H. Decamps (1996) ArticleTitleLandscape structure and diversity in riparian plant communities: A longitudinal comparative study. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12 367–390

    Google Scholar 

  105. D. Tarlock (2000) ArticleTitleAustralia moves towards basin-wide Environmental flows. Rivers 7 138–140

    Google Scholar 

  106. InstitutionalAuthorNameUNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (2000) European forest and protected areas: gap analysis. Cambridge UK 27

    Google Scholar 

  107. A. L. van Coller K. H. Rogers G. L. Heritage (1997) ArticleTitleLinking riparian vegetation types and fluvial geomorphology along the Sabie River within the Kruger National Park, South Africa. African Journal of Ecology 35 194–212

    Google Scholar 

  108. F. Vasicek (1991) Changes in the structure and biomass of the herb layer under the conditions of a medium moisture gradient. M. Penka M. Vyskot E. Klimo F. Vasicek (Eds) Floodplain forest ecosystem, II after water management measures. Elsevier Amsterdam 201–227

    Google Scholar 

  109. J. Vukelic D. Raus (2001) The lowland forests of Croatia. Pages 101–126 E. Klimo H. Hager (Eds) The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  110. J. V. Ward K. Tockner U. Uehlinger F. Malard (2001) ArticleTitleUnderstanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17 311–323

    Google Scholar 

  111. D. Whitaker B. Shelby (2000) ArticleTitleManaged flow regimes and resource values: traditional versus alternative strategies. Rivers 7 233–244

    Google Scholar 

  112. P. J. Whiting (1998) ArticleTitleFloodplain maintenance flows. Rivers 6 160–170

    Google Scholar 

  113. R. J. A. M. Wolf J. G. Vrielink R. W. de Waal (2001) History, management and classification of floodplain forests in the Netherlands. Pages 203–220 E. Klimo H. Hager (Eds) The Floodplain Forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  114. Zockler, C. 2000. Wise use of floodplains: review of river restoration projects in a number of European countries. WWF European Freshwater Programme, EU Life Programme, Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK, 98 pp.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by EU research contract: EVK1-CT-1999-00031FLOBAR2 [Floodplain Biodiversity and Restoration 2 (FLOBAR2): Integrated Natural Science and socio-economic approaches to flow management]. We would like to thank Bill Adams, Angela Arthington, Jacky Girel, Chris Joyce, Jackie King, Tim Moss, and Keith Richards for providing references, comments, and advice on the manuscript. Our thinking on the subject of environmental flows has been much helped by discussions with the FLOBAR2 advisory committee, including Peter Allen-Williams (DEFRA), Russell Cryer (RSPB), Mark Diamond (Environment Agency), Nigel Holmes, Gary Kerr (Forestry Commission), Keith Kirby (English Nature), George Peterken, Christoph Zockler (UNEP-WCMC), and people who attended the FLOBAR2 workshop in Cambridge in May 2002. Owen Tucker kindly redrew the figures.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francine M. R. Hughes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, F., Rood, S. Allocation of River Flows for Restoration of Floodplain Forest Ecosystems: A Review of Approaches and Their Applicability in Europe. Environmental Management 32, 12–33 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2834-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Flow allocation
  • Floodplain forest
  • Regeneration flows
  • Maintenance flows
  • River management
  • River restoration