Environmental Management

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 12–33 | Cite as

Allocation of River Flows for Restoration of Floodplain Forest Ecosystems: A Review of Approaches and Their Applicability in Europe

Profile

Abstract

Floodplain forests are flood-dependent ecosystems. They rely on well-timed, periodic floods for the provision of regeneration sites and on tapered flood recession curves for the successful establishment of seedlings. These overbank flood events are described as “regeneration flows.” Once floodplain forest trees are established, in order to grow they also require adequate, although variable, river stage levels or “maintenance flows” throughout the year. Regeneration flows are often synonymous with flood flows and only occur periodically. There is a disparity between this need for varied interannual flows over the decadal time frame and the usual annual cycle of flow management currently used by most river management agencies. Maintenance flows are often closer to established minimum flows and much easier to provide by current operational practices.A number of environmental flow methodologies, developed in North America, Australia, and South Africa are described in this review. They include the needs of the floodplain environment in the management and allocation of river flows. In North America, these methodologies have been put into practice in a number of river basins specifically to restore floodplain forest ecosystems. In Australia and South Africa, a series of related “holistic approaches” have been developed that include the needs of floodplain ecosystems as well as in-channel ecosystems. In most European countries, restoration of floodplain forests takes place at a few localized restoration sites, more often as part of a flood-defense scheme and usually not coordinated with flow allocation decisions throughout the river basin. The potential to apply existing environmental flow methodologies to the management of European floodplain forests is discussed.

Keywords

Flow allocation Floodplain forest Regeneration flows Maintenance flows River management River restoration 

References

  1. Acreman, M. C., and Adams B. 1998. Lowflows, groundwater and wetland interactions. Report to Environment Agency (WC-013) UKWIR (98/WR/09/1) and NERC 9BGS WD/98/11). Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, E. D., Nankervis, J. M. 1995

    Effective discharges and the design of channel maintenance flows for gravel -bed rivers.

    Costa, J. E.Miller, A. J.Potter, K. W.Wilcock, P. R. eds. Natural and anthropogenic influences in fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union geophysical monograph 89,American Geophysical UnionWashington, DC.151164
    Google Scholar
  3. Arthington, A. H. 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of Holistic methodologies. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 26/98, 46 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Arthington, A. H., Pusey, B. J. 1993In-stream flow management in Australia: methods, deficiencies and future directions.Australian Biologist65260Google Scholar
  5. Arthington, A. H., and Pusey B. J. 2003. Flow restoration and protection in Australian river. River Research and Applications (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Arthington, A. H., and Zalucki J. M. (eds.) 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Review of methods. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 27/98, 141 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Arthington, A. H., King, J. M., O’Keeffe, J. H., Bunn, S. E., Day, J. A., Pusey, B. J., Bluhdorn, D. R., Tharme, R. 1992

    Development of an holistic approach for assessing environmental flow requirements of riverine ecosystems.Pages 69–76

    Pigram, J. J.Hooper, B. P. eds. Water allocation for the environment. Proceedings of an International seminar and workshop at The Centre for Water Policy Research,University of New EnglandArmidale, Australia
    Google Scholar
  8. Arthington, A. A. H., Brizga S. O., and Kennard M. J. 1998. Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Flow Assessment Techniques: Best Practice Framework. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 25/98, 26 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Arthington, A. H., Brizga, S. O., Choy, S. C., Kennard, M. J., Mackay, S. J., Cosker, R. O., Ruffini, J. L., Zalucki, J. M. 2000Environmental flow requirements of the Brisbane River downstream from Wivenhoe DamSouth East Queensland Water Corporation Ltd. and Centre for Catchment and In-stream Research, Griffith UniversityBrisbane, Australia539Google Scholar
  10. Barsoum, N., and Hughes F. M. R.1998. Regeneration response of black poplar to changing river levels. Pages 397–412 in Hydrology in a changing environment, Volume 1. British Hydrological Society and Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Bayley, P. B. 1995Understanding larger river-floodplain ecosystems.Bioscience45153158Google Scholar
  12. Bednarek, A. T. 2001Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impact of dam removal.Environmental Management27803814Google Scholar
  13. Bovee, K. D. 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 12. US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, DC, FWS/OBS-82/26.Google Scholar
  14. Bren, L. J. 1991Modelling the influence of River Murray management on the Barmah River redgum forests.Australian Forestry54915Google Scholar
  15. Brinson, M. M. 1990

    Riverine forests.

    Lugo, A.Brinson, M. M.Brown, S. eds. Forested wetlands.ElsevierNew York87141
    Google Scholar
  16. Brizga, S. O. 1998. Methods addressing flow requirements for geomorphological purposes. Pages 8–46 in A. H. Arthington, and J. M. Zalucki (eds.), Comparative evaluation of environmental flow assessment techniques: review of methods. LWRRDC Occasional Paper 27/98, 141 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Brizga, S. O. 2000. Burnett River water allocation management plan: proposed environmental flow performance measures: Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane, Australia, 2 volumes.Google Scholar
  18. Bruwer, C., Poultney, C., Nyathi, Z. 1996

    Community based hydrological management of the Phongolo floodplain.

    Acreman, M. C.Hollis, G. E. eds. Water management and wetlands in sub-Saharan Africa.IUCN, GlandSwitzerland199211
    Google Scholar
  19. Bullock, A., Gustard, A. 1992

    Application of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology to assess ecological flow requirements in a British lowland river.

    Carling, P. A.Petts, G. E. eds. Lowland floodplain river: geomorphological perspectives.WileyChichester, UK252277
    Google Scholar
  20. Bunn, S. E., Loneragan, N. R. 1998

    River flows and estuarine ecosystems.

    Arthington, A. H.Zalucki, J. M. eds. Environmental flow requirements of the Brisbane River downstream from Wivenhoe Dam.Centre for Catchment and In-stream ResearchBrisbane461482
    Google Scholar
  21. Cals, M. J. R., Postma, R., Buijse, A. D., Marteijn, E. C. L. 1998Habitat Restoration along the River Rhine in the Netherlands: putting ideas into practice. Aquatic Conservation.Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems86170Google Scholar
  22. Cordes, L. D., Hughes, F. M. R., Getty, M. 1997Contemporary and historical factors affecting the regeneration and distribution of riparian woodlands along a northern prairie river; the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada.Journal of Biogeography24675695Google Scholar
  23. De Jong, J., Van Rooy P. T. J. C., and Hosper S. H. 1994. Living with water: At the crossroads of change. Pages 477–491 in Proceedings of the international conference on integrated water resources management, 26–29 September. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Décamps, H. 1993River margins and environmental change.Ecological Applications3441445Google Scholar
  25. Décamps, H. 1996The renewal of floodplain forests along rivers: a landscape perspective.Vereiningung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie263559Google Scholar
  26. EU. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. The European Parliament, Belgium. Google Scholar
  27. Franz, E. H., azzaz, F. A. 1977Simulation of vegetation response to modified hydrologic regimes: a probabilistic model based on niche differentiation in a floodplain forest.Ecology58176183Google Scholar
  28. Gan, K., McMahon, J. 1990Variability of results from the use of PHABSIM in estimating habitat area. Regulated Rivers.Research and Management5233239Google Scholar
  29. Gopal, B., Junk, W. J., Davis, J. A. 2001Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation, volume 2.Backhuys PublishersLeiden, The Netherlands311Google Scholar
  30. Gore, J. A., Layzer, J. B., Russell, I. A. 1992

    Non-traditional applications of instream flow techniques for conserving habitat of biota in the Sabie River of Southern Africa.

    Boon, P. J.Calow, P.Petts, G. E. eds. River conservation and management.WileyChichester, UK161178
    Google Scholar
  31. Gore, J. A., Layzer, J. B., Mead, J. 2001Macroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: a role in stream management and restoration. Regulated Rivers.Research and Management17527542Google Scholar
  32. Gregory, S. V., Hulse D. W., Landers, D. H., and Whitelaw E. 1998. Integration of biophysical and socioeconomic patterns in riparian restoration of large rivers. Pages 231–247 in Hydrology in a changing environment, volume 1, British Hydrological Society and Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Gurnell, A. M. 1995

    Vegetation along river corridors: Hydrogeomorphological interactions.

    Gurnell, A.M.Petts, G.E. eds. Changing river channels.WileyChichester, UK237260
    Google Scholar
  34. Hager, H., Schume, H. 2001

    The floodplain forests along the Austrian Danube. Pages 83– 100

    Klimo, E.Hager, H. eds. The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives.European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden
    Google Scholar
  35. Haraszthy, L. 2001

    The floodplain forests in Hungary. Pages 17–24

    Klimo, E.Hager, H. eds. The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives.European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden
    Google Scholar
  36. Hill, M., Platts, W. S., Beschta, R. L. 1991Ecological and geomorphological concepts for instream and out-of-channel flow requirements.Rivers2198210Google Scholar
  37. Horton, R. E. 1945Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrological approach to quantitative morphology.Bulletin of the Geological Society of America56275370Google Scholar
  38. Howard, G. W., and Williams G. J. (eds.). 1982. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Environment and Change: the consequences of the hydroelectric power development on the utilization of the Kafue Flats, Lusaka, April, 1978, Kafue Basin Research Committee, University of Zambia, Lusaka.Google Scholar
  39. Hughes, F. M. R. 1997Floodplain biogeomorphology.Progress in Physical Geography21501529Google Scholar
  40. Hughes, F. M. R. 2002. Can we manage rivers to benefit alluvial woodlands? Pages 187–196 in B.C. van Dam and S. Bordacs (eds.), Genetic diversity in river populations of European Black Poplar: Implications for riparian ecosystem management. Proceedings of an international symposium, 16–20 May 2001. Szekszard, Hungary. Google Scholar
  41. Hughes, F. M. R., Rood, S. B. 2001

    Floodplains.

    Warren, A.French, J.R. eds. Habitat conservation: managing the physical environment.WileyChichester, UK105122
    Google Scholar
  42. Hughes, F. M. R., Adams, W. M., Muller, E., Nilsson, C., Richards, K. S., Barsoum, N., Decamps, H., Foussadier, R., Girel, J., Guilloy, H., Hayes, A., Johansson, M., Lambs, L., Pautou, G., Peiry, J.-L., Perrow, M., Vautier, F., Winfield, M. 2001The importance of different scale processes for the restoration of floodplain woodlands. Regulated Rivers.Research and Management17325345Google Scholar
  43. Irwin, E. R., Freeman, M. C. 2002Proposal for Adaptive Management to conserve biotic integrity in a regulated segment of the Tallapoosa River, Alabama, USA.The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology1612121222Google Scholar
  44. Jahn, L. R. 1990Managing riverine values and uses.Rivers112Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, W. C. 1992Dams and riparian forests: case study from the Upper Missouri River.Rivers3229242Google Scholar
  46. Junk, W. J., Welcomme, R. 1990

    Floodplains.

    Patten, B. C. eds. Wetlands and shallow continental water bodies, volume 1.SPB Academic PublishingThe Hague491524
    Google Scholar
  47. Kangas, P. C. 1990

    Long-term development of forested wetlands.

    Lugo, A.Brinson, M. M.Brown, S. eds. Forested wetlands.ElsevierNew York2551
    Google Scholar
  48. Kern, K., and Zinke A. 2000. Rehabilitation of the Danube in the reach affected by the hydropower system of Gabcikovo. Pages 130–139 in G. Kovacs (ed.), Proceedings of the international symposium for living rivers: river rehabilitation of international waterways, 21 January 2000. Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  49. Kerr, G., and Nisbet T. R. 1996. The restoration of floodplain woodlands in lowland Britain. Environment Agency Research and Development Technical Report W15, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  50. King, J. M., Louw, D. 1998Instream flow assessment for regulated rivers in South Africa using the building block methodology.Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management1109124Google Scholar
  51. King, J. M., and Tharme R. E. 1994. Assessment of the instream flow incremental methodology and initial development of alternative instream flow methodologies for South Africa. Water Research Commission Report No 295/1/94. Google Scholar
  52. King, J. M., Brown C., and Sabat H. 2003. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications (in press).Google Scholar
  53. Klimo, E. 2001. The floodplain forests Ecosystems in Southern Moravia, Czech Republic, Pages 25–36 in Klimo & Hager 2001.Google Scholar
  54. Klimo, E., and Hager H. (eds.). 2001. The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, and European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10.Google Scholar
  55. Kondolf, G. M. 1998Development of flushing flows for channel restoration on Rush Creek, California.Rivers6183193Google Scholar
  56. Kondolf, G. M., Wilcock, P. R. 1996The flushing flow problem: Defining and evaluating objectives.Water Resources Research3225892599Google Scholar
  57. Latham, J., and Kirby K. 1998. Wet woodland: a habitat action plan. UK English Nature, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Loneragan, N. R., Bunn, S. E. 1999River flows and estuarine ecosystems: implications for coastal fisheries from a review and a case study of the Logan River, southeast Queensland.Australian Journal of Ecology24431440Google Scholar
  59. Lorenz, C. M., Gilbert, A., Cofino, W. P. 2001Environmental auditing: indicators for transboundary river management.Environmental Management28115129Google Scholar
  60. Maddock, I. P., Bickerton, M. A., Spence., R., Pickering, T. 2001Reallocation of compensation releases to restore river flows and improve instream habitat availability in the Upper Derwent catchment, Derbyshire, UK. Regulated Rivers.Research and Management17417441Google Scholar
  61. Mahoney, J. M., Rood, S. B. 1992Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates.Forest Ecology and Management54141156Google Scholar
  62. Mahoney, J. M., Rood, S. B. 1998Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment-an integrative model.Wetlands18634645Google Scholar
  63. Malanson, G. P. 1993Riparian landscapes.Cambridge University PressCambridge296Google Scholar
  64. Marsh, T., Black, A., Acreman, M., Elliot, C. 2000

    River Flows. Pages 101–133

    Acreman, M. eds. The hydrology of the UK: a study of change.in association with the British Hydrological SocietyRoutledge, London101133
    Google Scholar
  65. Mitsch, W. J., Gosselink, J. G. 1993Wetlands.Van Nostrand ReinholdNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Moon, B. P., Van Niekirk, A. W., Heritage, G. L., Rogers, K. H., James, C. S. 1996A geomorphological approach to the management of rivers in the Kruger National Park: the case of the Sabie River.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers223148Google Scholar
  67. Moss, T. 2001. Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU Water Framework Directive. Discussion paper 3, Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner, Germany, 11 pp.Google Scholar
  68. Murray Water Entitlement Committee. 1997. Sharing the Murray: proposal for defining people’s entitlements to Victoria’s water from the Murray. 53 pp.Google Scholar
  69. Naiman, R. J., Décamps, H. 1997The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones.Annual Review of Ecological Systematics28621658Google Scholar
  70. Naiman, R. J., Bunn, S. E., Nilsson, C., Petts, G. E., Pinay, G., Thompson, L. C. 2002Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview.Environmental Management30455467Google Scholar
  71. Nanson, G. C., Croke, J. C. 1992A genetic classification of floodplains.Geomorphology4459486Google Scholar
  72. Nilsson, C., Grelsson, G., Dynesius, M., Johanssen, M., Sperens, U. 1991Small rivers behave like large rivers: effects of postglacial history on plant species richness along riverbanks.Journal of Biogeography18533541Google Scholar
  73. Pearlstein, L., McKellar, H., Kitchens, W. 1985Modelling the impacts of a river diversion on bottomland forest communities in the Santee River floodplain, South Carolina.Ecological Modelling29283302Google Scholar
  74. Petersen, R. C., Petersen, L. B.-M., Lacoursiere, J. 1992

    A building block model for stream restoration. Pages 293–310

    Boon, P. J.Calow, P.Petts, G. E. eds. River Conservation and Management.Wiley, ChichesterUK
    Google Scholar
  75. Pettit, N. E., Froend, R. H., Davies, R. H. 2001Identifying the natural flow regime and the relationship with riparian vegetation for two contrasting Western Australian rivers.Regulated Rivers: Research and Management17201215Google Scholar
  76. Phipps, R. L. 1979Simulation of wetlands forest vegetation dynamics.Ecological Modelling7257288Google Scholar
  77. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. I., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., Stromberg, J. C. 1997The Natural Flow Regime.Bioscience47769784Google Scholar
  78. Puckeridge, J. T., Walker, K. F., Costelloe, J. F. 2000Hydrological persistence and the ecology of dryland rivers.Regulated Rivers: Research and Management16385402Google Scholar
  79. Puhakka, M., Kalliola, R., Rajasilta, M., Salo, J. 1992River types, site evolution and successional vegetation patterns in Peruvian Amazonia.Journal of Biogeography19651665Google Scholar
  80. Pusey, B. J., Arthington, A. H., Read, M. G. 1998Freshwater fishes of the Burdekin River, Australia: biogeography, history and spatial variation in assemblage structure.Environmental Biology of Fishes53303318Google Scholar
  81. Reid, M. A., Brooks, J. J. 2000Detecting effects of environmental water allocation in wetlands of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia.Regulated Rivers: Research and Management16479496Google Scholar
  82. Reiser, D. W., Ramey, M. P., Wasche, T. A. 1989

    Flushing flows. Pages91–135

    Gore, J. A.Petts, G. E. eds. Alternatives in Regulated River Management.CRC PressBoca Raton, Florida
    Google Scholar
  83. Rood, S. B., Mahoney, J. M. 1990The collapse of river valley forests downstream from dams in the western prairies: probable causes and prospects for mitigation.Environmental Management14451464Google Scholar
  84. Rood, S. B., Mahoney, J. M. 2000Revised Instream flow regulation enables cottonwood recruitment along the St. Mary River, Alberta, Canada.Rivers7109125Google Scholar
  85. Rood, S. B., Mahoney, J. M., Reid, D., Zilm, L. 1995Instream flows and the decline of riparian cottonwoods along the St. Mary River, Alberta.Canadian Journal of Botany7312501260Google Scholar
  86. Rood, S. B., Kalischuk, A. R., Mahoney, J. M. 1998Initial cottonwood seedling recruitment following the flood of the century along the Oldman River, Alberta, Canada.Wetlands18557570Google Scholar
  87. Rood S. B., Gourley C., Ammon E. M., Heki L. G., Klotz J. R., Morrison M. L., Mosley D., Scoppettone G. G., Swanson S., Wagner P. L. 2003. Flows for floodplain forests: successful riparian restoration along the lower Truckee River, Nevada, USA. BioScience (in press).Google Scholar
  88. Rosgen, D. L, Silvey, H. L., Potyondy, J. P. 1986The use of channel maintenance flow concepts in the forest service.Hydrological Sciences and Technology21926Google Scholar
  89. Schaefer, J. M., Brown, M. T. 1992Designing and protecting river corridors for wildlife.Rivers31426Google Scholar
  90. Scudder, T. 1991The need and justification for maintaining transboundary flood regimes: the African case.Natural Resources Journal3275107Google Scholar
  91. Scudder, T., Acreman, M. C. 1996

    Water management for the conservation of the Kafue wetlands, Zambia and the practicalities of artificial flood releases. Pages 101–106

    Acreman, M. C.Hollis, G. E. eds. Water management and wetlands in sub-Saharan AfricaIUCN GlandSwitzerland
    Google Scholar
  92. Segelquist, C. A., Scott, M. L., Auble, G. T. 1993Establishment of Populus deltoides under simulated alluvial groundwater declines.American Midland Naturalist130274285Google Scholar
  93. Shafroth, P. B., Auble, G. T., Scott, M. L. 1995Germination and establishment of the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall subsp. monilifera) and the exotic Russian olive (Eleagnus angustifolia L.).Conservation Biology911691175Google Scholar
  94. Shafroth, P. B., Auble, G. T., Stromberg, J. C., Patten, D. T. 1998Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona.Wetlands18577590Google Scholar
  95. Sher, A. A., Marshall, D. L., Gilbert, S. A. 2000Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance.Conservation Biology1417441754Google Scholar
  96. Sienkiewicz J., Kloss M., Grzyb M. 2001. The Floodplain Forests Ecosystems in Poland. Pages 249–267 in E. Klimo and H. Hager (eds.), The Floodplain Forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, and European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10.Google Scholar
  97. Somogyi, Z., Szabados, I., Vesperdi, G. 1999Growth and health of floodplain forests in the Szigetkoz (N-W Hungary) before and after diversion of the Danube: results of a ten-year monitoring.Ekologia185968Google Scholar
  98. Stalnaker, C., Lamb, B. L., Henriksen, J., Bovee, K., Bartholow, J. 1995The instream flow incremental methodology. A primer for IFIM. Biological report 29.National Biological Service, US Fish and Wildlife ServiceWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  99. Stevens, L. E., and Waring G. L. 1985. The effects of prolonged flooding on the riparian plant community in Grand Canyon. Pages 81–86 in Riparian ecosystems and their management—reconciling conflicting uses. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-120, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  100. Stromberg, J. C., Patten, D. T. 1990Riparian vegetation instream flow requirements: a case study from a diverted stream in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.Environmental Management14185194Google Scholar
  101. Stromberg, J. C., Patten, D. T. 1991Instream flow requirements for cottonwoods at Bishop Creek, Inyo County, California.Rivers2111Google Scholar
  102. Stromberg, J. C., Tiller, R., Richter, B. 1996Effects of groundwater decline on riparian vegetation of semiarid regions: the San Pedro, Arizona.Ecological Applications6113131Google Scholar
  103. Swales, S., Harris, J. H. 1995

    The Expert Panel Assessment Method (EPAM): a new tool for determining environmental flows in regulated rivers.

    Harper, D.M.Ferguson, A.J.D. eds. The ecological basis for river management.Wiley and SonsChichester, UK125134
    Google Scholar
  104. Tabacchi, E, Planty-Tabacchi, A. M., Salinas, M. J., Decamps, H. 1996Landscape structure and diversity in riparian plant communities: A longitudinal comparative study.Regulated Rivers: Research and Management12367390Google Scholar
  105. Tarlock, D. 2000Australia moves towards basin-wide Environmental flows.Rivers7138140Google Scholar
  106. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme)-World Conservation Monitoring Centre2000European forest and protected areas: gap analysis.CambridgeUK27Google Scholar
  107. van Coller, A. L., Rogers, K. H., Heritage, G. L. 1997Linking riparian vegetation types and fluvial geomorphology along the Sabie River within the Kruger National Park, South Africa.African Journal of Ecology35194212Google Scholar
  108. Vasicek, F. 1991

    Changes in the structure and biomass of the herb layer under the conditions of a medium moisture gradient.

    Penka, M.Vyskot, M.Klimo, E.Vasicek, F. eds. Floodplain forest ecosystem, II after water management measures.ElsevierAmsterdam201227
    Google Scholar
  109. Vukelic, J., Raus, D. 2001

    The lowland forests of Croatia. Pages 101–126

    Klimo, E.Hager, H. eds. The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives.European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10.Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden
    Google Scholar
  110. Ward, J. V., Tockner, K., Uehlinger, U., Malard, F. 2001Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration.Regulated Rivers: Research and Management17311323Google Scholar
  111. Whitaker, D., Shelby, B. 2000Managed flow regimes and resource values: traditional versus alternative strategies.Rivers7233244Google Scholar
  112. Whiting, P. J. 1998Floodplain maintenance flows.Rivers6160170Google Scholar
  113. Wolf, R. J. A. M., Vrielink, J. G., de Waal, R. W. 2001

    History, management and classification of floodplain forests in the Netherlands. Pages 203–220

    Klimo, E.Hager, H. eds. The Floodplain Forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives.European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden
    Google Scholar
  114. Zockler, C. 2000. Wise use of floodplains: review of river restoration projects in a number of European countries. WWF European Freshwater Programme, EU Life Programme, Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK, 98 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of Cambridge, Downing Place, CambridgeCB2 3EN United Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AlbertaCanada T1K 3M4

Personalised recommendations