Skip to main content

Economic Values and Corporate Financial Statements

Environmental Management volume 32, pages 1–11 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Corporate financial statements do not include environmental values. This deficiency has contributed to the criticism that company managers do not include environmental impacts in the internal decision-making process. The accounting profession has not developed effective environmental reporting guidelines. This situation contributes to a second problem: the apparent inability of corporate reports to provide useful information to external parties. It has been suggested that by using nonmarket valuation methodologies, financial statements can be used to measure progress toward sustainable development. Nonmarket valuations are not generally accepted by the accounting profession. They are too subjective to support effective decisions, and too costly to obtain. Furthermore, demand for this sort of information appears small. Some of these issues may be resolved over time. The most serious challenge, however, concerns how enhanced financial reports would be used. Financial statements are supposed to help investors assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of future cash flows. A substantial portion of environmental value is based on nonuse benefits, much of which will never be realized in company cash flows. In other words, the role of financial statements would have to change. Furthermore, since there is no general agreement as to the meaning of “sustainable development,” efforts to operationalize the term have been fraught with difficulty. Moreover, monetization of environmental values could jeopardize their preservation, leaving some to question the overall objective of this form of reporting. For these reasons, while it is to be hoped that better reporting of environmental impacts will be forthcoming, the greatest advances will likely be outside the financial statements themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • R. Attfield (1998) ArticleTitleExistence value and intrinsic value. Ecological Economics. 24 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ayres (1998) ArticleTitleThe price–value paradox. Ecological Economics. 25 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ball P. Brown (1968) ArticleTitleAn empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research. 6 159–178

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Barron C. Kile T. O’Keefe (1999) ArticleTitleMD&A quality as measured by the SEC and analysts’ earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Review. 16 75–109

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Beaver (1973) ArticleTitleWhat should be the FASB’s objectives?. The Journal of Accountancy (August): . 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Bewley Y. Li (2000) ArticleTitleDisclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management. 1 201–226

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Birnberg (1980) ArticleTitleThe role of accounting in financial disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R., and T. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased? 61:926–930.

  • R. Bjornstad R. Cummings L. Osborne (1997) ArticleTitleA learning design for reducing hypothetical bias in the contingent valuation method. Environmental and Resource Economics 10 207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Blamey J. Bennett M. Morrison (1999) ArticleTitleYea-saying in contingent valuation surveys. Land Economics 75 126–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunn, R. 1992. Content of reports growing. Financial Post. 19 October, P. s31.

  • P. Bohm (1972) ArticleTitleEstimated demand for public goods European Economic Review 3 111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Boxall W. Adamowicz J. Swait M. Williams J. Louviere (1996) ArticleTitleA comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18 243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Brookshire D. Coursey (1987) ArticleTitleMeasuring the value of a public good American Economic Review 77 554–566

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Brookshire A. Randall J. Stoll (1980) ArticleTitleValuing increments and decrements in natural resource service flows. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 478–488

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Brookshire M. Thayer W. Schulze R. D’Arge (1982) ArticleTitleValuing public goods American Economic Review 72 165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, N (1994) Environmental Disclosures: An Empirical Study of Corporate Communication in Canada and the Role of Accounting, PhD dissertation. University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Byrd I. Chen (1997) Financial reporting in Canada Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Toronto 424

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Academic Accounting Association. 2002. Canadian Accounting and Education Research News. E. Deutsch (ed.). Toronto, (Spring):28 pp.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) (1993) Environmental costs and liabilities: accounting and financial reporting issues CICA Toronto 129

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) (1994) Reporting on environmental performance CICA Toronto 183

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) (1997) Full cost accounting from an environmental perspective CICA Toronto 105

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) (2001) CICA Handbook—Accounting Volume 1 CICA Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carson N. Flores K. Martin J. Wright (1996) ArticleTitleContingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies Land Economics 72 80–99

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carson N. Flores N. Meade (2001) ArticleTitleContingent valuation controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 173–210

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Champ R. Bishop T. Brown D. McCollum (1997) ArticleTitleUsing donation mechanisms to value non use benefits from public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33 151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Clawson J. Knetsch (1966) Economics of outdoor recreation Resources for the Future Inc. Baltimore, Maryland 328

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C., Halstead T. and Rowe. R. 1995. The genuine progress indicator: Summary of data and methodology, Redefining Progress, San Francisco, California, 50 pp.

  • D. Cormier M. Magnan (1999) ArticleTitleCorporate environmental disclosure strategies Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 14 429–451

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Costanza L. Wainger (1991) ArticleTitleEcological Economics. Business Economics 26 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Brasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

  • R. G. Cummings D. S. Brookshire W. Schulze (1986) Valuing environmental resources: an assessment of the contingent valuation method Rowman & Allanheld Totowa, New Jersey 270

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Deegan B. Gordon (1996) ArticleTitleA study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26 187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Earth Sanctuaries Limited. 1996. Annual Report. 30 June.

  • Environmental Protection and Toxics Agency. 1996. Full cost accounting for decision making at Ontario Hydro. EPA742-R-95-004. 42 pp. US EPA, Washington, DC,

  • M. Epstein (1996) Measuring corporate environmental performance The IMA Foundation for Applied Research Montvale, New Jersey 303

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Estes (1972) ArticleTitleSocio-exonomic accounting and external diseconomies. The Accounting Review 47 284–290

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Fekrat C. Inclan D. Petroni (1996) ArticleTitleCorporate environmental disclosures The International Journal of Accounting 32 175–195

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fletcher W. Adamowicz T. Graham-Tomasi (1990) ArticleTitleThe travel cost model of recreation demand. Leisure Sciences 12 119–147

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Freedman B. Jaggi (1986) ArticleTitleAn analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures in annual financial statements on investors’ decisions. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1 193–212

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Freedman B. Jaggi (1988) ArticleTitleAn analysis of the association between pollution disclosures and economic performance. Accounting, Auditing and Accounting Journal 1 43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Freedman C. Wasley (1990) ArticleTitleThe association between environmental performance and environmental disclosures in annual reports and 10Ks. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3 183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Freeman (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values—theory and method Resources for the Future Washington DC 516

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gamble K. Hsu D. Kite R. Radtke (1995) ArticleTitleEnvironmental disclosures in annual reports and 10Ks, an examination. Accounting Horizons 9 34–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn S., and Beech. J. 2002. Emissions trading: are you ready? CA Magazine 135:24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Goodland G. Ledec (1987) ArticleTitleNeoclassical economics and principles of sustainable development. Ecological Modelling 38 19–46

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gray (1992) ArticleTitleAccounting and environmentalism Accounting Organizations and Society 17 399–425

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Greenley R. Walsh R. Young (1981) ArticleTitleOption value Quarterly Journal of Economics 96 657–673

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hanemann (1991) ArticleTitleWillingness to pay and willingness to accept American Economic Review 81 635–647

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Hanley R. Wright V. Adamowicz (1998) ArticleTitleUsing choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental Resource Economics 11 413–428

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Harte D. Owen (1991) ArticleTitleEnvironmental disclosures in the annual reports of British companies Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 4 51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hines (1991) ArticleTitleOn valuing nature. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 4 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Hinterberger F. Luks F. Schmidt-Bleek (1997) ArticleTitleMaterial flows vs. “natural capital” Ecological Economics 23 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Huizing H. Dekker (1992) ArticleTitleHelping to pull our planet out of the red Accounting Organizations and Society 17 449–458

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute of Sustainable Development. 1997. Measuring sustainable development: a review of current practice. Industry Canada, Ottawa, 124 pp.

  • K. Jakobsson A. Dragun (2001) ArticleTitleThe worth of a possum Environmental and Resource Economics 19 211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kahneman J. Knetsch (1992) ArticleTitleValuing public goods Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kahneman A. Tversky (1979) ArticleTitleProspect theory Econometrica 47 263–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Li B. McConomy (1999) ArticleTitleAn empirical examination of factors affecting the timing of environmental accounting standard adoption and the impact on corporate valuation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 14 279–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Li G. Richardson D. Thornton (1997) ArticleTitleCorporate disclosure of environmental liability information Contemporary Accounting Research 14 435–474

    Google Scholar 

  • J. List C. Gallet (2001) ArticleTitleWhat experimental protocal influence disparities between actual and hypothetical state values?. Environmental and Resource Economics 20 241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Little M. Muoghalu H. Robison (1995) ArticleTitleHazardous waste lawsuits, financial disclosure, and investors’ interests. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 10 385–397

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Loomis T. Brown B. Lucero G. Peterson (1996) ArticleTitleImproving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods Land Economics 72 450–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. R., Furtado J., Klemm C., McNeely J., Myres N., Soule M., and Texton M. 1985. Maintaining biological diversity, the key factor for a sustainable society. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

  • Mitchell, R., and Carson R. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources of the Future, Washington DC, 463 pp.

  • S. Mobley (1970) ArticleTitleThe challenge of socio-economic accounting. The Accounting Review 45 762–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, J., and Menz F. 1985. The effect of acidification damages on the economic value of the Adirondack fishery to New York anglers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 67:112–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Neill R. Cummings P. Ganderton G. Harrison T. McGuckin (1994) ArticleTitleHypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics 70 145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Nunes J. van den Bergh (2001) ArticleTitleEconomic valuation of biodiversity Ecological Economics 39 203–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppong, A., and Cherry D. 1987. Reporting the effects of changing prices: has the experiment failed? CMA Magazine 61:50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Owen (1992) The implications of current trends in green awareness for the accounting function: an introductory analysis. D. Owen (Eds) Green reporting: accountancy and the challenge of the nineties Chapman and Hall London 299

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Ramanathan (1976) ArticleTitleToward a theory of corporate social accounting. The Accounting Review 11 516–527

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Randall J. Hoehn (1996) ArticleTitleEmbedding in market demand systems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Reither (1997) ArticleTitleHow the FASB approaches a standard-setting issue. Accounting Horizons 11 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ridker (1967) Economic costs of air pollution: studies in measurement Praeger New York 214

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. 1993. A deep ecology critique of accounting. York University Faculty of Administrative Studies Research Papers #20–93. Toronto

  • J. Rockness (1985) ArticleTitleAn assessment of the relationship between US corporate environmental performance and disclosure. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 12 339–354

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Rollins A. Lyke (1998) ArticleTitleThe case for diminishing marginal existence values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 324–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L. 1997. GAAP, evaluation and decision-making. CA Magazine 130:40–52

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Rubenstein (1994) Environmental accounting for the sustainable corporation: strategies and techniques Quorum Books Westport, Conn 207

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Scott (1997) Financial accounting theory Prentice-Hall Canada 502

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C., D. Neu, and C. Ruff. 1993. Socially Responsible Reporting. CGA Magazine. 27:49–52.

  • Society of Management Accountants of Canada. 1997. Accounting for sustainable development: a business perspective. Management Accounting Issues Paper No. 14. Hamilton, Ontario, 58 pp.

  • Solow, R. 1992. An almost practical step toward sustainability. In lecture given on the occasion of the fortieth anniversary of Resources for the Future. Later published in 1997, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

  • Statistics Canada. 1997. Econnections: linking the environment and the economy. Cat 16–200-XKE, Ottawa, 26 pp.

  • A. Wildavsky (1994) ArticleTitleAccounting for the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 461–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A. 1997. Counting the costs. CA Magazine 130:48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. O. Wilson (1988) The current state of biological diversity. E. O. Wilson (Eds) Biodiversity National Academy Press Washington, DC 521

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wiseman (1982) ArticleTitleAn evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWorld Commission of Environment and Development (1987) Our common future Oxford University Press New York 400

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Management, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St. Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, Canada

    Vanessa Magness

Authors
  1. Vanessa Magness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magness, V. Economic Values and Corporate Financial Statements . Environmental Management 32, 1–11 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2625-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2625-2

Keywords

  • Environmental accounting
  • Social responsibility reporting