ABSTRACT
Although there is a solid body of research on both collaborative decision-making and on processes using models, there is little research on general public attitudes about models and their use in making policy decisions. This project assessed opinions about computer models in general and attitudes about a specific model being used in water planning in the Middle Rio Grande Region of New Mexico, United States. More than 1000 individuals were surveyed about their perceptions of computer-based models in general. Additionally, more than 150 attendees at public meetings related to the Middle Rio Grande planning effort were surveyed about their perceptions of the specific Rio Grande-based model. The results reveal that the majority of respondents are confident in their ability to understand models and most believe that models are appropriate tools for education and for making policy decisions. Responses also reveal that trust in who develops a model is a key issue related to public support. Regarding the specific model highlighted in this project, the public revealed tremendous support for its usefulness as a public engagement tool as well as a tool to assist decision-makers in regional water planning. Although indicating broad support for models, the results do raise questions about the role of trust in using models in contentious decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Cockerill K. 1996. Preliminary Sandia analysis. Unpublished report prepared for the Institute for Public Policy, University of New Mexico
CRDSS (Colorado River Decision Support System). Undated. http://cdss.state.co.us/overview/bigoverview/crdsscov.asp. Accessed August 2003
R. Costanza M. Ruth (1998) ArticleTitleUsing dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus Environmental Management 22 183–195 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002679900095 Occurrence Handle9465128
R. Costanza L. Cornwell (1992) ArticleTitleThe 4P approach to dealing with scientific uncertainty Environment 34 12–20
A. Ford (1999) Modeling the environment: An introduction to system dynamics modeling of environmental systems Island Press Washington, DC
T. Hellström M. Jacob (1996) ArticleTitleUncertainty and values: The case of environmental impact assessment Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization 9 70–84
L. E. Johnson (1990) ArticleTitleComputer-aided planning for multiple-purpose reservoir operating policies AWRA Water Resources Bulletin 26 299–311
L. Jordão P. Antones R. Santos N. Videira S. Martinho (1997) NoChapterTitle Barlas Yaman Dker Vedat Polat Seckin (Eds) 15th International System Dynamics Conference: Systems approach to learning and education into the 21st century Bogazici University Printing Office Istanbul, Turkey 463–466
J. S. McDonald M. Hession A. Rickard M. J. Nieuwenhuijsen M. Kendall (2002) ArticleTitleAir quality management in UK local authorities: public understanding and participation Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 571–590 Occurrence Handle10.1080/09640560220143567
R. N. Palmer A. M. Keyes S. Fisher (1993) Water management in the 90’s; A time for innovation K. Hon (Eds) Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference American Society for Civil Engineering Washington, DC 451–454
H. D. Passell V. C. Tidwell S. H. Conrad R. P. Thomas J. Roach (2003) Cooperative water resource modeling in the Middle Rio Grande basin. SAND Report 2003-0636 Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico
R. E. Punnett J. M. Stiles (1993) Water management in the 90’s: A time for innovation K. Hon (Eds) Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference American Society for Civil Engineering Washington, DC 495–497
D. Randall D. P. Sheer H. Meyer (1988) Computerized decision support systems for water managers J. W. Labadie L. E. Brazil I. Corbu L. E. Johnson (Eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Water Resources Operations Management Workshop American Society for Civil Engineering Washington, DC 88–95
E. A. J. A Rouwette J. A. M. Vennix T. Mullekom Particlevan (2001) ArticleTitleGroup model building effectiveness: A review of assessment studies System Dynamics Review 18 5–45 Occurrence Handle10.1002/sdr.229
D. Saunders-Newton H. Scott (2001) ArticleTitle“But the computer said!”: Credible uses of computational modeling in public sector decision making Social Science Computer Review 19 47–65
K. Stave (2003) ArticleTitleA system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada Journal of Environmental Management 67 303–313 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00205-0 Occurrence Handle12710919
J. D. Sterman (2000) Business dynamics, systems thinking and modeling for a complex world McGraw-Hill Boston
V. H. Sublet V. T. Covello T. L. Tinker (Eds) (1996) Scientific uncertainty and its influence on the public communication process. Proceedings of a NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Paris, France, September 8–10, 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
Tidwell, V. C., H. D. Passell, S. H. Conrad, and R. P. Thomas. 2004. System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: An application to the Middle Rio Grande. Journal of Aquatic Sciences (in press)
van den Belt, M. 1998. Mediated modeling project: An integrated scoping model of the Upper Fox River Basin. Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay
van den Belt, M. 2004. Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington, DC
J. Vennix (1996) Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics John Wiley & Sons New York
Wallace, S. D., and F. Sancar. 1988. Pages 448–459 in J. B. Homer and A. Ford (eds). Proceedings of the 1988 International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society. International System Dynamics Society, La Jolla, California
G. Wills (1999) A necessary evil: A history of American distrust of government Simon & Schuster New York
S. Yearley (1999) ArticleTitleComputer models and the public’s understanding of science: A case-study analysis Social Studies of Science 29 IssueID6 845–866
Acknowledgments
The Sandia National Laboratories Small Business Assistance Program in collaboration with the State of New Mexico provided funding for this project. The authors thank the Middle Rio Grande Water Assembly for allowing us to present our surveys at their public meetings. Finally, the final version of this article is greatly improved due to reviewer and editor comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cockerill, K., Tidwell, V. & Passell, H. Assessing Public Perceptions of Computer-Based Models. Environmental Management 34, 609–619 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0259-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0259-z