Abstract
At the end of the 1980s, Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) became aware of their responsibility towards the environment and environmental policy. In this article, the development of environmental auditing by SAIs during the last Io years is presented, as well as the current state of the art. The description is based on the results of three questionnaire surveys held in 1994, 1997, and 2000 by the INTOSAI Working Group in Environmental Auditing. In most countries, the government has stipulated some form of environmental policy, and the SAI has a mandate to carry out regularity and/or performance audits. The activities of SAIs have developed substantially since 1993. Nowadays, environmental auditing is a substantial and regular part of the audit work of more than half of the SAIs. Environmental problems are often transboundary in nature. SAIs can contribute to international environmental cooperation by auditing the compliance of their national government with international environmental obligations and commitments. The INTOSAI Working Group on environmental auditing wants to enhance this type of audit and has provided guidelines for the audit process and the selection of international agreements. Moreover, cooperation between SAIs is a good method to exchange experiences and to learn from each other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Canadian House of Commons. 1995. Auditor General Act. 1976–77, c. 34, s. 1., including the amendments to the Auditor General Act of 1995.
INTOSAI (International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions). 1998. INTOSAI Guidance How SAIs may co-operate on the audit of international environmental accords. INTOSAI, The Hague, The Netherlands.
INTOSAI. 2001. INTOSAI Guidance Standards and guidelines on environmental auditing. INTOSAI, The Hague, The Netherlands.
INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. 1994. Results of the first questionnaire on environmental auditing, held in 1993. INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. 1998. Results of the second questionnaire on environmental auditing (1997). INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. 2001a. Results of the third survey on environmental auditing. INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. 2001b. The audit of international environmental accords. INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, The Hague, The Netherlands. All INTOSAI and Working Group documents are available at http://www.environmental-auditing.org.
The Netherlands. 1992. Government Accounts Act. Staatsblad 1992:351.
Quevedo, E.L. 1995. Environmental audit reports: proceed with caution. Bio/technology 13:44–45.
SAI (Supreme Audit Institution) of Bulgaria. 2001. Report on the regularity and performance audit of the application of the provisions of the Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable Use of the Danube River (Danube River Protection Convention) by the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria as represented by the Ministry of the Environment and Water, over the 01.04.1999–30.06.2001 period. Ministry of Finance, State Financial Control Department, Sofia, Bulgaria.
SAI of Canada. 1997. Annual report 1997. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
SAI of Canada. 1998. Annual report 1998. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
SAI of China. 1999. A case of water resource audit: auditing a wastewater treatment plant of X City in China. English summary. National Audit Office of the People’s Republic of China (CNAO), Beijing, China.
SAI of Colombia. 2002. Exposicion de la auditoria ambiental a la subcuenca binacional del Rio Tachira. Presented at the “Seminar contribución del control en la gestión ambiental y patrimonio cultural.” Contraloria General de Peru, Lima, Peru.
SAI of Croatia. 2002. Audit of the provisions of the Convention on Co-operation for the Protection and Sustainable Use of the Danube River. The State Audit Office, Zagreb, Croatia.
SAI of Cyprus. 2002. Report Co-ordinated environmental audit pollution from ships at sea and in ports. Audit Office of the Republic, Nicosia, Cyprus.
SAIs of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, and Sweden. 2001. Joint final report on findings over parallel audits of implementation of the provisions of the convention on the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area (Helsinki Convention). Supreme Chamber of Control, Warsaw, Poland.
SAIs of Denmark, Iceland, and Norway. 2001. Evaluation report on the concurrent audit of the national implementation of the OSPAR-convention. Riksrevisjonen, Oslo, Norway.
SAI of Egypt. 2000. Audit on the extent of the available protection necessary for preventing pollution of the Nile River. Audit Office of Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
SAI of France. 2002. Country paper on preservation of water resources in the face of pollution from agricultural sources: the case of Brittany. Presented at the Second Meeting of EUROSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. Cour des Comptes, Paris, France.
SAI of Greece. 2003. MARPOL audit report; Preventing and dealing with marine pollution from ships. Court of Audit, Athens, Greece.
SAI of Israel. 2001. Transport of fuel in the Gulf of Eilat. The State Comptroller, Jerusalem, Israel.
SAI of Italy. 2003. Relazione sul risultato dell’indagine riguardante “prevenzione e trattamento dell’inquinamento marino a seguito di scarico di oli da navi”/The prevention and treatment of water pollution following the discharge of oil from ships; Report nr. 41/2003. Corte dei Conti, Roma, Italy.
SAI of Malta. 2003. Performance audit; Preventing and dealing with pollution from ships at sea and in ports; Report by the Auditor General. National Audit Office, Floriana, Malta.
SAI of Mauritius. 2000. Leakage in potable water storage and distribution systems. Office of the Director of Audit, Port Louis, Mauritius.
SAI of The Netherlands. 1999. Compliance with international agreements on wetlands, parliamentary paper no. 26 490. SDU Uitgevers, The Hague, The Netherlands.
SAI of The Netherlands. 2001. Marine pollution from ships. Netherlands Court of Audit, The Hague, The Netherlands.
SAI of The Netherlands. 2002. Bestrijding uitstoot broeikasgassen (Reduction of the emission of greenhouse gasses), parliamentary paper no. 28 272. SDU Uitgevers, The Hague, The Netherlands.
SAI of New Zealand. 2001. Meeting international environmental obligations. Office of the Controller and Auditor-General, Wellington, New Zealand.
SAI of Peru. 2001. Contribuyendo con la protección de las especies en el marco de la convención sobre el comercio internacional de especies amenazadas de fauna y flora silvestres—CITES. (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). Contraloria General de Peru, Lima, Peru.
SAI of Peru. 2002. Auditoria de Gestión Ambiental y de Patrimonio Cultural a la Cuenca del Lago Titicaca/Audit of environmental administration and of the cultural patrimony in the cuenca of the Lake Titicaca. General report and 6 specific reports, titled: the special bilateral project of the Lake Titicaca; the National Institute of Natural Resources; the municipal government; the sanitation company; the regional directorate of industry and tourism; the National Cultural Institute. Contraloria General de Peru, Lima, Peru.
SAIs of Poland, Czech Republic, and Slovak Republic. 2002. Joint final report of the parallel audits of implementation and fulfilment of tasks concerning the protection of water against pollution in the Baltic Sea catchment area (Helsinki Convention) by the countries which are not signatories to this convention with the participation of the Supreme Chamber of Control of the Republic of Poland. Supreme Chamber of Control, Warsaw, Poland.
SAI of Romania. 2002. Report on compliance by Romanian government with provisions of Convention on Co-operation and Sustainable Use of Danube River. Court of Accounts Romania Curtea de Conturi, Bukarest, Romania.
SAI of the United Kingdom. 2002. Dealing with pollution from ships. National Audit Office, London, United Kingdom.
SAI of the United States of America. 1999. International Environment: Experts’ Observations on Enhancing Compliance with a Climate Change Agreement (RCED-99-248). General Audit Office, Washington D.C., United States of America.
SAI of the United States of America. 2000. Key EPA and state decisions limited by inconsistent and incomplete data. General Audit Office, Washington D.C., United States of America.
Acknowledgments
This article is published in a personal capacity and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Netherlands Court of Audit. The author thanks her colleagues Robert Went, Marco van Maasackers, Floris Roijackers, and the anonymous reviewers of this journal for their comments on an earlier version of this article, and Kathy Bose of the Office of the Auditor General of Canada, who edited the draft manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leeuwen, S. Developments in Environmental Auditing by Supreme Audit Institutions. Environmental Management 33, 163–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0063-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0063-9