Environmental Management

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 646–659 | Cite as

Spatial Modeling of Harvest Constraints on Wood Supply Versus Wildlife Habitat Objectives

Environmental Assessment


We studied the effects of spatial and temporal timber harvesting constraints on competing objectives of sustaining wildlife habitat supply and meeting timber harvest objectives in a boreal mixedwood forest. A hierarchical modeling approach was taken, where strategic and tactical level models were used to project blocking and scheduling of harvest blocks. Harvest block size and proximity, together with short- and long-term temporal constraints, were adjusted in a factorial manner to allow creation of response–surface models. A new measure of the habitat mosaic was defined to describe the emergent pattern of habitat across the landscape. These models, together with multiple linear regression, were used to provide insight on convergence or divergence between spatial objectives. For example, green-up delay (defined as time required before a harvest block adjacent to a previously logged block can be scheduled for harvest) had an adverse effect on the amount of annual harvest area that could be allocated and blocked spatially, and habitat supply responded in an opposite direction to that of wood supply, where caribou, moose wintering, and marten habitat supply increased when harvest blocks were further apart, maximum block size smaller, and both a green-up delay and mesoscale stratification were applied. Although there was no “solution space” free of conflicts, the analysis suggests that application of the mesoscale stratification, together with a diversity of harvest block sizes and a between-harvest block proximity of 250 m, will perform relatively well with respect to wood supply objectives, and at the same time create a less fragmented landscape that better reflects natural forest patterns.


Wood supply Habitat supply Habitat suitability modeling Spatial constraint modeling Landscape pattern Forest management Tradeoff analysis Marten Woodland caribou Moose Ovenbird 


  1. 1.
    Arthaud, G. J., Rose, D. W. 1996A methodology for estimating production possibility frontiers for wildlife habitat and timber value at the landscape level.Canadian Journal of Forest Research2621912200Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baskent, E. Z. 1997Assessment of structural dynamics in forest landscape management.Canadian Journal of Forest Research2716751684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baskent, E. Z., Yolasigmaz, H. A. 1999Forest landscape management revisited.Environmental Management24437448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergerud, A. T., Jakimchuk, R. D., Miller, D. R. 1984The buffalo of the north: caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and human developments.Arctic37722Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boston, K., Bettinger, P. 2001Development of spatially feasible forest plans: a comparison of two modelling approaches.Silva Fennica35425435Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bottan, B., Euler, D. and Rempel R. 2002. Adaptive management of moose in Ontario. Alces 38: (in press). Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlsson, M. 1999A method for integrated planning of timber production and biodiversity: a case study.Canadian Journal of Forest Research2911831191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cumming, H. G., Beange, D. B. 1993Survival of woodland caribou in commercial forests of northern Ontario.Forestry Chronicle69579588Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, R. 1997Sustainable Forest Management Model Version 1.1.Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesSault Ste. Marie, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elkie, P. C., Rempel, R. S. 2001Detecting scales of pattern in boreal forest landscapes.Forest Ecology and Management147253261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gluck, M. J., Rempel, R. S. 1996Structural characteristics of post-wildfire and clearcut landscapes.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment39435450Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gustafson, E. J. 1996 Expanding the scale of forest management: Allocating timber harvests in time and space.Forest Ecology and Management872739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gustafson, E. J., Crow, T. R. 1996Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure.Journal of Environmental Management467794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gustafson, E. J., Shifley, S. R., Mladenoff, D. J., Nimerfro, K. K., He, H. S. 2000Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS.Canadian Journal of Forest Research303243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hochbaum, D. S., Pathria, A. 1997Forest harvesting and minimum cuts: A new approach to handling spatial constraints.Forest Science43544554Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter Jr., M. L. 1993Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests.Biological Conservation65115120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jenkins, K., Starkey, E. 1996Simulating secondary succession of elk forage values in a managed forest landscape, western Washington.Environmental Management20715724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kauffman, C. K. 2000Analysis of spatial harvest constraints on ecological (wildlife habitat) versus economic (timber harvest) objectives. MScF thesis.Lakehead UniversityThunder Bay, Ontario238Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kliskey, A. D., Lofroth, E. C., Thompson, W. A., Brown, S., Schreier, H. 1999Simulating and evaluating alternative resource-use strategies using GIS-based habitat suitability indices.Landscape and Urban Planning45163175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurttila, M. 2001The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning—a landscape ecological perspective.Forest Ecology and Management142129142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, G. L., Nelson, J. D., Wardman, C. W. 2000A target-oriented approach to forest ecosystem design-changing the rules of forest planning.Ecological Modelling127269281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naesset, E. 1997A spatial decision support system for long-term forest management planning by means of linear programming and a geographical information system.Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research127788Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources)1988Timber management guidelines for the provision of moose habitat.Queen’s Printer for OntarioToronto, Ontario31Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources)2002Forest management guide for natural pattern emulation.Queen’s Printer for OntarioToronto, Ontario29Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puttock, G. D., Timossi, I., Davis, L. S. 1998BOREAL: A tactical planning system for forest ecosystem management.Forestry Chronicle74413420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rempel, R. S., Elkie, P. C., Rodgers, A. R., Gluck, M. J. 1997Timber-management and natural-disturbance effects on moose habitat: Landscape evaluation.Journal of Wildlife Management61517524Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rempel, R. S., Carr, A. Kauffman, C. Elkie, P. and McNicol J. 1999. Natural disturbance analysis and planning tools: development, integration, and application of models to support forest management planning. Pages 657–661 in Proceedings of the 1999 Sustainable Forest Management Network Conference - Science and Practice: Sustaining the Boreal Forest. Sustainable Forest Management Network, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Remsoft Inc. 1998. Stanley Version 2.0. Canada-British Columbia Partnership Agreement on Forest Resource Development: FRDA II. Fredericton, NB.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rohweder, M. R., McKetta, C. W., Riggs, R. A. 2000Economic and biological compatibility of timber and wildlife production: an illustrative use of production possibilities frontier.Wildlife Society Bulletin28435447Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Slocombe, D. S 1998Defining goals and criteria for ecosystem-based management.Environmental Management22483493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L, Henein, K., Merriam, G. 1993Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure.Oikos68571573Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thompson, I. D., Colgan, P. W. 1987Numerical response of martens to a food shortage in northcentral Ontario.Journal of Wildlife Management51824835Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tittler, R., Messier, C., Burton, P. J. 2001Hierarchical forest management planning and sustainable forest management in the boreal forest.Forestry Chronicle779981005Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Deusen, P. C. 2001Scheduling spatial arrangement and harvest simultaneouslySilva Fennica358592Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Walters, C. J. 1995

    Adaptive Policy Design for Forest Management in British Columbia. Pages 80–85

    Taylor, B.Kremsater, L.Ellis, R. eds. Adaptive management of forests in British Columbia.Province of British ColumbiaVictoria, British Columbia931997
    Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walters, C. J., Holling, C. S. 1990Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing.Ecology7120602068Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wightman, R. A., Baskent, E. Z. 1994Forest neighbourhoods for timber harvest scheduling.Forestry Chronicle70768772Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Young, J. L., Duinker, P. N. 1998Canada’s national forest strategies: a comparative analysis.Forestry Chronicle74683693Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem ManagementLakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1Canada
  2. 2.Faculty of Forestry and the Forest EnvironmentLakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 5E1Canada

Personalised recommendations