Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Generic Types of Drilling Fluid Using a Risk-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Environmental Assessment
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The composition of drilling muds is based on a mixture of clays and additives in a base fluid. There are three generic categories of base fluid - water, oil, and synthetic. Water-based fluids (WBFs) are relatively environmentally benign, but drilling performance is better with oil-based fluids (OBFs). The oil and gas industry developed synthetic-based fluids (SBFs), such as vegetable esters, olefins, ethers, and others, which provide drilling performance comparable to OBFs, but with lower environmental and occupational health effects. The primary objective of this paper is to present a methodology to guide decision-making in the selection and evaluation of three generic types of drilling fluids using a risk-based analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In this paper a comparison of drilling fluids is made considering various activities involved in the life cycle of drilling fluids.This paper evaluates OBFs, WBFs, and SBFs based on four major impacts—operations, resources, economics, and liabilities. Four major activities—drilling, discharging offshore, loading and transporting, and disposing onshore—cause the operational impacts. Each activity involves risks related to occupational injuries (safety), general public health, environmental impact, and energy use. A multicriteria analysis strategy was used for the selection and evaluation of drilling fluids using a risk-based AHP. A four-level hierarchical structure is developed to determine the final relative scores, and the SBFs are found to be the best option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Anon. 1999. Shale shakers and drilling fluid systems: techniques and technology for improving solids control management, American Association of Drilling Engineers, Gulf Publishing Company.

  2. P.K. Dey (2002) ArticleTitleAn integrated assessment model for cross-country pipelines, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22 703–721 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00020-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. L. Golden P. T. Harker E. A. Wasil (1989) Applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer-Verlag Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Hall (2000) ArticleTitleEster based drilling fluids: still the best environmental option? Offshore 59(9) 129–130 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXhsVyntL4%3D Occurrence Handle2537340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. C. L. Hwang M. J. Lin (1987) Group decision-making under multiple criteria. Springer-Verlag NY

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. L. Hwang K. Yoon (1981) Multiple attribute decision-making—methods and applications, a state of the art survey. Springer-Vaerlag NY

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meinhold, A. F. (1998) Framework for a comprehensive environmental assessment of drilling fluids, National Petroleum Technology Office, Office of Fossil Energy, US Department of Energy, Tulsa, Oklahoma, BNL-66108.

  8. T. L. Saaty (1988) Multi-criteria decision-making: the analytic hierarchy process. University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pa

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. L. Saaty (1996) Decision-making with dependence and feedback: the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. L. Saaty (2001) How to make a decision? Chapter 1 T. L. Saaty L. G. Vargas (Eds) Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer International Series Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sadiq, R. 2001. Drilling waste discharges in the marine environment: a risk-based decision methodology. PhD thesis. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.

  12. R. Sadiq T. Husain B Veitch N. Bose (2003) ArticleTitleRisk management of drilling waste disposal in the marine environment—a holistic approach, Oceanic Engineering International 7(1) 1–22 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXltVajsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle3098436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thanyamanta, W. (2003) Evaluation of offshore drilling cuttings management technologies using multicriteria decision-making, M Eng thesis. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada.

  14. US EPA (1999) Development documents for proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for synthetic-based drilling fluids and other non-aqueous drilling fluids in the oil and gas extraction point source category. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA-821-B-98-021.

  15. M. Ziara K. Nigim A. Enshassi B. M. Ayyub (2002) ArticleTitleStrategic implementation of infrastructure priority projects: case study in Palestine, ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems 8(1) 2–11 Occurrence Handle10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:1(2)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge with gratitude the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through a Strategic Project: Offshore environmental engineering using autonomous underwater vehicles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council (NRC), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Rehan Sadiq

  2. Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada

    Tahir Husain, Brian Veitch & Neil Bose

Authors
  1. Rehan Sadiq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tahir Husain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian Veitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Neil Bose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rehan Sadiq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadiq, R., Husain, T., Veitch, B. et al. Evaluation of Generic Types of Drilling Fluid Using a Risk-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process . Environmental Management 32, 778–787 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0009-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0009-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation