Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nose Surgery (Rhinoplasty) Without External Immobilization and Without Internal Packing: A Review of 812 Cases

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In a review of 812 cases of rhinoplasty, none of our patients had early bone or septal displacement; swelling, bruising, and pain were almost nonexistent. This confirms that an external split would not have been of any benefit in these cases. Packing should help prevent epistaxis, synechiae, and early bone and septal displacement. Not using any packing, we have not encountered these complications. Besides, we have not seen a single submucosal hematoma or a septal necrosis. Therefore, we doubt the value of packing in our patients. The inconveniences and complications of external splits and internal packing are described. Early postoperative photographs show the reduced swelling and bruising, and late photographs show the final results. Difficult primary and secondary rhinoplasty cases are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camirand, A., Doucet, J. & Harris, J. Nose Surgery (Rhinoplasty) Without External Immobilization and Without Internal Packing: A Review of 812 Cases. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 22, 245–252 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002669900199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002669900199

Navigation