Abstract
Introduction
The Australian medical board, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) has recently introduced new regulations mandating providers of cosmetic surgery undertake a clinical screen for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in all potential cosmetic surgery patients. The assessment must be conducted by the surgeon using a validated psychological screening tool. The aims of this paper are to discuss the key clinical characteristics of BDD before reviewing currently validated screening tools that would meet this new regulatory requirement, and which may be most applicable to a busy plastic surgery practice.
Methods
A literature search identified 1164 titles, of which 229 titles were retrieved for abstract screening. Six studies were identified that validated BDD screening tools in a setting relevant to cosmetic plastic surgery.
Results
Six validated screening were identified: BDD Questionnaire (BDDQ), BDD Questionnaire Dermatology Version (BDDQ-DV), BDD Questionnaire Aesthetic Surgery (BDDQ-AS), Cosmetic Procedure Screening Questionnaire (COPS), Body Dysmorphia Symptom Scale (BDSS) and the BDD Screening Test (BDD-ST). Our group practice has chosen to adopt the BDDQ-AS to meet the AHPRA regulator requirement for BDD screening based on its robust validation and ease of use in clinical practice, consisting of a seven-item self-report questionnaire that can be reliably completed in 1-2 minutes in most cases.
Conclusion
Of the six screening tools for body dysmorphic disorder available for use in clinical practice that have been validated in a cosmetic population setting, we have chosen to use the BDD Questionnaire Aesthetic Surgery (BDDQ-AS). To date all available validated screening tools are based on the DSM-IV, and further work to develop a validated screening tool based on the revised definition of BDD in the DSM-V is recommended, with a particular focus on items relating to repetitive physical or mental behaviours.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (2023) FAQ: guidelines for registered medical practitioners who perform cosmetic surgery and procedures - patient assessment and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) screening. https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/FAQ/FAQ-Guidelines-Patient-assessment-and-body-dysmorphic-disorder-BDD-screening.aspx. Accessed 9th February 2024
American Psychological Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, pp 242–247
American Psychological Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, pp 505–511
American Psychological Association (2022) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, pp 271–277
Picavet V, Gabriels L, Jorissen M, Hellings PW (2011) Screening tools for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic surgery setting. Laryngoscope 121:2535–2541
Ribeiro RVE (2017) Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder in plastic surgery and dermatology patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 41:964–970
Veale D, Gledhill LJ, Christodoulou P, Hodsoll J (2016) Body dysmorphic disorder in different settings: a systematic review and estimated weighted prevalence. Body Image 18:168–186
Crerand CE, Menard W, Phillips KA (2010) Surgical and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures among persons with body dysmorphic disorder. Ann Plast Surg 65:11–16
Bowyer L, Krebs G, Mataix-Cols D, Veale D, Monzani B (2016) A critical review of cosmetic treatment outcomes in body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image 19:1–8
Türk CB, Maymone MBC, Kroumpouzos G (2023) Body dysmorphic disorder: a critical appraisal of diagnostic, screening, and assessment tools. Clin Dermatol 41:16–27
Philips K (2005) The broken mirror: understanding and treating body dysmorphic disorder. Oxford University Press, New York
Dey JK, Ishii M, Phillis M, Byrne PJ, Boahene K, Ishii LE (2015) Body dysmorphic disorder in a facial plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic: measuring prevalence, assessing comorbidities, and validating a feasible screening instrument. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17:137–143
Dufresne RG, Phillips KA, Vittorio CC, Wilkel CS (2001) A screening questionnaire for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic a dermatologic surgery practice. Dermatol Surg 27:457–462
Ishii LE, Tollefson TT, Basura GJ et al (2017) Clinical practice guideline: improving nasal form and function after rhinoplasty executive summary. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156:205–219
Lekakis G, Picavet VA, Gabriëls L, Grietens J, Hellings PW (2016) Body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic rhinoplasty: validating a new screening tool. Laryngoscope 126:1739–1745
Veale D, Ellison N, Werner TG, Dodhia R, Serfaty MA, Clarke A (2012) Development of a cosmetic procedure screening questionnaire (COPS) for body dysmorphic disorder. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg 65:530–532
Ramos TD, Brito MJ, Piccolo MS, Rosella MF, Sabino Neto M, Ferreira LM (2016) Body dysmorphic symptoms scale for patients seeking aesthetic surgery: cross-cultural validation study. Sao Paulo Med J 134:480–490
Perugi G, Akiskal HS, Giannotti D, Frare F, Di Vaio S, Cassano GB (1997) Gender-related differences in body dysmorphic disorder (dysmorphophobia). J Nerv Ment Dis 185:578–582
Vulink NC et al (2008) Body dysmorphic disorder screening in maxillofacial outpatients presenting for orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:981–991
Funding
There was no funding source for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomson, D.R., Thomson, N.E.V. & Southwick, G. Screening for Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Plastic Surgery Patients. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03959-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03959-6