Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reply: “Lipoabdominoplasty: Comparing UAL Versus UAL/PAL Techniques on Complication Profile and Patient Safety”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Duran A, Buyukdogan H (2023) Lipoabdominoplasty: comparing UAL versus UAL/PAL techniques on complication profile and patient safety. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03741-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyos A, Perez ME, Guarin DE, Montenegro A (2018) A report of 736 high-definition lipoabdominoplasties performed in conjunction with circumferential VASER Liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3):662–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scuderi N, Paolini G, Grippaudo FR, Tenna S (2000) Comparative evaluation of traditional, ultrasonic, and pneumatic assisted lipoplasty: analysis of local and systemic effects, efficacy, and costs of these methods. Aesthet Plast Surg 24(6):395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith LF, Smith LF (2015) Safely combining abdominoplasty with aggressive abdominal liposuction based on perforator vessels: technique and a review of 300 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1357–1366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tran BNN, Didzbalis CJ, Chen T, Shulzhenko NO, Asaadi M (2022) Safety and efficacy of third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction: a series of 261 cases. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(5):2310–2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02992-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific Grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr. Tambasco is consultant from Attiva, from Solta and from Apyx.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Damiano Tambasco & Federica Tomaselli

  2. Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Medical Area (DAME), Academic Hospital of Udine, Santa Maria Misericordia Hospital, University of Udine, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy

    Roberta Albanese

Authors
  1. Damiano Tambasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberta Albanese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Federica Tomaselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Albanese.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tambasco, D., Albanese, R. & Tomaselli, F. Reply: “Lipoabdominoplasty: Comparing UAL Versus UAL/PAL Techniques on Complication Profile and Patient Safety”. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 376–377 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03813-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03813-1

Search

Navigation