Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Breast Implant Illness Through a Psychiatric Lens

  • Original Articles
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since their introduction in the 1960’s, the safety of silicone breast implants has remained contentious due to concerns regarding carcinogenicity as well as a growing array of adverse psychiatric symptoms, which have now been termed ‘Breast Implant Illness.’ This article aims to explore the merits of a psychiatric approach to treating Breast Implant Illness by outlining how it is defined by psychiatric symptoms and categorized alongside other psychiatric illnesses. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the pathology of Breast Implant Illness is purely medical or psychiatric. However, the efficacy of the medical approach to treatment through a process called explantation, which involves removal of the implant and surrounding scar tissue, or capsule, is not strongly supported by existing data. A psychiatric approach to treatment, in conjunction with explanation, thus holds potential in remedying the novel and poorly understood Breast Implant Illness.

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2020) Plastic surgery statistics report. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2020.pdf Accessed 5 May 2023

  2. Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, Timman R, Menke-Pluymers MB, Hofer SO, Mureau MA, Tibben A (2011) Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(8):1062–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duggal CS, Metcalfe D, Sackeyfio R, Carlson GW, Losken A (2013) Patient motivations for choosing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 70(5):574–580. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182851052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calobrace MB, Capizzi PJ (2014) The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):6S-11S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Nunen SA, Gatenby PA, Basten A (1982) Post-mammoplasty connective tissue disease. Arthritis Rheum 25(6):694–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780250613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2011) FDA update on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

  7. Tanne JH (2006) FDA approves silicone breast implants 14 years after their withdrawal. BMJ 333(7579):1139. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39048.332650.DB

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Institute of Medicine (US) (1999) Committee on the safety of silicone breast implants. In: Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R (ed). Safety of silicone breast implants. National Academies Press, Washington. https://doi.org/10.17226/9602

  9. Schleiter KE (2010) Silicone breast implant litigation. AMA J Eth 12(5):389–394. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.5.hlaw1-1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Vries CEE, Kaur MN, Klassen AF, Sommers K, Hume KM, Pusic AL (2022) Understanding breast implant-associated illness: a delphi survey defining most frequently associated symptoms. Plast Reconstr Surg 149(6):1056e–1061e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica (2021) Psychosomatic disorder. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/psychosomatic-disorder. Accessed 5 May 2023

  12. Cleveland Clinic (2021) Psychosomatic disorder. Myclevelandclinic.org. Accessed 10 Apr 2023, from https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21521-psychosomatic-disorder

  13. Kaplan J, Rohrich R (2021) Breast implant illness: a topic in review. Gland Surg 10(1):430–443. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-231

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Duvic M, Moore D, Menter A, Vonderheid EC (1995) Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in association with silicone breast implants. J Am Acad Dermatol 32(6):939–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(95)91328-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2019) Questions and answers about breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Fda.gov. Retrieved Apr 10, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/questions-and-answers-about-breast-implant-associated-anaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma-bia-alcl

  16. Rohrich RJ, Kaplan J, Dayan E (2019) Silicone implant illness: science versus myth? Plast Reconstr Surg 144(1):98–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brinton LA, Lubin JH, Burich MC, Colton T, Brown SL, Hoover RN (2000) Breast cancer following augmentation mammoplasty (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11(9):819–827. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008941110816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deapen D, Hamilton A, Bernstein L, Brody GS (2000) Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival among patients with prior breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(2):535–540. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200002000-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kam K, Lee E, Pairawan S, Anderson K, Cora C, Bae W, Senthil M, Solomon N, Lum S (2015) The Effect of breast implants on mammogram outcomes. Am Surg 81(10):1053–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS (1988) Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151(3):469–473. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.3.469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyoshi K, Shiragami H, Yoshida K (1973) Adjuvant disease of man. Clin Immunol (Tokyo) 5:785–794

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh FW, Solomon DA, Espinoza LR, Adams GD, Whitelocke HE (1989) Human adjuvant disease. A new cause of chylous effusions. Arch Intern Med 149(5):1194–1196. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.149.5.1194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brozena SJ, Fenske NA, Cruse CW, Espinoza CG, Vasey FB, Germain BF, Espinoza LR (1988) Human adjuvant disease following augmentation mammoplasty. Arch Dermatol 124(9):1383–1386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barsky AJ, Borus JF (1999) Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med 130(11):910–921. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Winfield JB (1999) Pain in fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 25(1):55–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70055-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dush DM (2001) Breast implants and illness: a model of psychological factors. Ann Rheum Dis 60(7):653–657. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.60.7.653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, McGuire PA, Adams WP Jr, Deva AK (2019) Breast implant illness: a way forward. Plast Reconstr Surg. 143:74S-81S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Janowsky EC, Kupper LL, Hulka BS (2000) Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases. N Engl J Med 342(11):781–790. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200003163421105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK (2004) Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg 52(6):598–601. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000128087.51384.f9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castro J, Billick S (2013) Psychiatric presentations/manifestations of medical illnesses. Psychiatric Q 84:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-012-9251-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Habib PM, Serena T, Derosa A (2022) Breast implant illness: a case series. Cureus 14(3):e23680. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Magno-Padron DA, Luo J, Jessop TC, Garlick JW, Manum JS, Carter GC, Agarwal JP, Kwok AC (2021) A population-based study of breast implant illness. Arch Plast Surg 48(4):353–360. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.02117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Metzinger SE, Homsy C, Chun MJ, Metzinger RC (2022) Breast implant illness: treatment using total capsulectomy and implant removal. Eplasty 16(22):e5

    Google Scholar 

  34. de Boer M, Colaris M, van der Hulst RRWJ, Cohen Tervaert JW (2017) Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints? Immunol Res 65(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-016-8813-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rohrich RJ, Bellamy JL, Alleyne B (2022) assessing long-term outcomes in breast implant illness: the missing Link? A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg 149(4):638e–645e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peters W, Smith D, Fornasier V, Lugowski S, Ibanez D (1997) An outcome analysis of 100 women after explantation of silicone gel breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 39(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199707000-00002. (PMID: 9229086)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Colaris MJL, de Boer M, van der Hulst RR, Cohen Tervaert JW (2017) Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature. Immunol Res 65(1):120–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-016-8821-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bonner D, Ron M, Chalder T, Butler S, Wessely S (1994) Chronic fatigue syndrome: a follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57(5):617–621. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.5.617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Deale A, Chalder T, Marks I, Wessely S (1997) Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 154(3):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.3.408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rossy LA, Buckelew SP, Dorr N, Hagglund KJ, Thayer JF, McIntosh MJ, Hewett JE, Johnson JC (1999) A meta-analysis of fibromyalgia treatment interventions. Ann behav Med: Publication Soc Behav Med 21(2):180–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. White KP, Nielson WR (1995) Cognitive-behavioral treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome: a follow-up assessment. J Rheumatol 22:717–721

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mengshod AM, Forseth KO, Hangen M, Walle-Hansen R, Forte O (1995) Multidisciplinary approach to fibromyalgia: a pilot study. Clin Rheumatol 14(2):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nicassio PM, Radojevic V, Weisman MH et al (1997) A comparison of behavioral and educational interventions for fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 24:2000–2007

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Kashviya Suri

  2. New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Stephen Billick

Authors
  1. Kashviya Suri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Billick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kashviya Suri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suri, K., Billick, S. Breast Implant Illness Through a Psychiatric Lens. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 559–567 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03692-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03692-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation