Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invited Response on: Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Response to Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Zhu L, Liu C (2023) Postoperative complications following prepectoral versus partial subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00266-023-03296-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernini M, Casella D, Mariotti C (2017) Selective pectoralis major muscle denervation in breast reconstruction: a technical modification for more effective and cosmetic results. Gland Surg 6(6):745–750. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.10.05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Eck DL, Nguyen DC, Barnes LL, Jansen DA (2018) Treatment of breast animation deformity in implant-based reconstruction with selective nerve ablation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(6):1472–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1184-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahabedian MY, Cocilovo C (2017) Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a comparison between prepectoral and partial subpectoral techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(6):22S-30S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidya R, Iqbal FM (2017) A guide to prepectoral breast reconstruction: a new dimension to implant-based breast reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer 17(4):266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernini M, Calabrese C, Cecconi L, Santi C, Gjondedaj U, Roselli J, Nori J, Fausto A, Orzalesi L, Casella D (2015) Subcutaneous direct to-implant breast reconstruction: surgical, functional, and aesthetic results after long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(12):e574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabriel A, Maxwell GP (2017) Prepectoral breast reconstruction in challenging patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(6S):14S-21S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Storm-Dickerson T, Sigalove T (2017) Prepectoral breast reconstruction: the breast surgeon’s perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(6S):43S-48S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, No. 2020-I2M-C&T-B-082, to Dr. Chunjun Liu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunjun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial interests relating to the work described and declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, L., Liu, C. Invited Response on: Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 15–16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03418-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03418-8

Navigation