Skip to main content
Log in

Immediate Nasal Reconstruction in Management of Infected Nasal Alloplast and Allografts: A Case Series

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of alloplastic and allogenic nasal implants is widely popular in rhinoplasty. However, the use of these materials is accompanied by a risk of infection and extrusion. Traditionally, management of these complications is performed in a dual-staged fashion. First, the implant is removed and infection is controlled, then a delayed reconstruction is performed. However, scarring and soft tissue contracture make a delayed reconstruction challenging, and optimal aesthetic outcomes are difficult to achieve. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of immediate nasal reconstruction following removal of an infected nasal implant.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who had infected nasal implants and underwent simultaneous removal and immediate nasal reconstruction with autologous cartilages (= 8). Data collected included patient age, race, pre-operative presentation, intraoperative surgical maneuvers, and post-operative outcomes and complications. Post-operative results were used to measure success of the single-staged method.

Results

Follow-up ranged from 12 to 156 months with mean 84.4 months of the eight patients who were evaluated in the study, none had any major post-operative complications that required revision or reconstruction. All of the patients had marked improvement in nasal form and function. Six of the eight (75%) patients reported excellent aesthetic outcomes; two (25%) requested revisional surgeries for aesthetic concerns.

Conclusion

Low complication rates and excellent aesthetic outcomes are possible in immediate autologous reconstruction following removal of an infected nasal implant. This is an alternative approach that obviates the inherent problems of a traditional delayed reconstruction.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266..

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7
Fig 8
Fig 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peled ZM, Warren AG, Johnston P, Yaremchuk MJ (2008) The use of alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty surgery: a meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000299386.73127.a7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi JY (2020) Complications of alloplast rhinoplasty and their management: a comprehensive review. Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1717082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark JM, Cook TA (2002) Immediate reconstruction of extruded alloplastic nasal implants with irradiated homograft costal cartilage. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200206000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen DS, Wang TD (2020) Management of dorsal graft and implant infections. Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YK, Shin S, Kang NH, Kim JH (2017) Contracted nose after silicone implantation: a new classification system and treatment algorithm. Arch Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.1.59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Winkler AA, Soler ZM, Leong PL, Murphy A, Wang TD, Cook TA (2012) Complications associated with alloplastic implants in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Genther DJ, Papel ID (2016) Surgical nasal implants: indications and risks. Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graw GJ, Calvert JW (2022) Dorsal augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2021.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Won T-B, Jin HR (2012) Immediate reconstruction with autologous cartilage after removal of infected alloplast in revision rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812459026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Calvert J, Kwon E (2015) Techniques for diced cartilage with deep temporalis fascia graft. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2014.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cerkes N, Basaran K (2016) Diced cartilage grafts wrapped in rectus abdominis fascia for nasal dorsum augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Villanueva K, Martin D, Martinkovich S, Blomain EW (2017) Treatment of a chronically infected nasal silicone prosthesis with continuous antibiotic irrigation and gentamicin-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads. JPRAS Open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2017.10.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dresner HS, Hilger PA (2008) An overview of nasal dorsal augmentation. Semin Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063566

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanna N, Nguyen KT, Ghavami A, Calvert JW, Guyuron B, Rohrich RJ, Gruber RP (2018) Evidence-based medicine: current practices in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK (2014) Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brenner KA, McConnell MP, Evans GR, Calvert JW (2006) Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000195082.38311.f4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay W. Calvert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Calvert is a consultant and paid speaker for Alma Lasers and MTF; however, these relations are not relevant to this manuscript. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest to disclose

Human or Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calvert, J.W., Kruayatidee, A., Shakoori, P. et al. Immediate Nasal Reconstruction in Management of Infected Nasal Alloplast and Allografts: A Case Series. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 689–701 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03397-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03397-w

Keywords

Navigation