References
Samargandi OA, Hasan H, Thoma A (2016) Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a systematic review. Plast Recon Surg 137(1):225e–236e
Samargandi OA, McGuire C (2021) How to avoid making your systematic review a conventional review article. Aesth Plast Surg 45:3048–3051
Tumeh RA, Neto MS, Sales GD, Ferreira LM (2023) Quality regarding the systematic reviews in breast plastic surgery. Aesth Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03264-8
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non- randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:1–9
McGuire C, Samargandi OA, Corkum J, Retrouvey H, Bezuhly M (2019) Meta-analyses in plastic surgery: can we trust their results? Plast Recon Surg 144:519–530
Sun BJ, Tijerina J, Nazerali RS, Lee GK (2018) The quality of systematic reviews in head and neck microsurgery: a perspective from plastic surgery and otolaryngology. Ann Plast Surg 80:S267–S273
Funding
There were no funding sources (internal or external) for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samargandi, O.A., McGuire, C. Quality Regarding the Systematic Reviews in Breast Plastic Surgery. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 568–569 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03275-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03275-5