Skip to main content
Log in

Retouched or Unaltered? That is the Question. Body Image and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery in Young Female Instagram Users

  • Survey
  • Special Topic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Viewing Instagram altered images of attractive women has negative effects on women’s body image. This study examined the effects of exposure to a ‘before’ and ‘after’ retouched image, in combination with a disclaimer, on female Instagram users’ thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction and acceptance of cosmetic surgery.

Methods

An experimental design with a control group without pretesting was adopted. Participants (N = 105) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 was exposed to a replica of an Instagram post with an enhanced image of a woman; Group 2 was shown the same enhanced image and the original one in combination with a disclaimer that the enhanced image had been digitally edited; Group 3 (the control) was exposed to a neutral image.

Results

The MANOVA showed that participants in Group 2 reported lower levels of thin-ideal internalization and acceptance of cosmetic surgery for social reasons compared to those in Group 1. Contrary to our hypothesis, the degree of body dissatisfaction was not significantly different among the three groups.

Conclusions

The present study could be promising for the development of brief interventions aimed at reducing the negative effects of Instagram exposure on young women’s body image.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Statista (2022) Demographics and use. https://www.statista.com/statistics/594259/italy-monthly-time-spent-on-top-15-website-categories/,April,2022

  2. Hogue JV, Mills JS (2019) The effects of active social media engagement with peers on body image in young women. Body Image 28(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cash TF (2011) Crucial considerations in the assessment of body image. In: Cash TF, Smolak L (eds) Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCabe M, Tatangelo G, Watson B, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Rodgers RF, Aimé A, Camacho AS (2019) Development and testing of a model for risk and protective factors for eating disorders and higher weight among emerging adults: a study protocol. Body Image 31:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nerini A, Matera C, Di Gesto C, Policardo GR, Stefanile C (2019) Exploring the links between self-compassion, body dissatisfaction, and acceptance of cosmetic surgery in young Italian women. Front Psychol 10:2698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02698

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Gesto C, Nerini A, Policardo GR, Matera C (2021) Predictors of acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Instagram images-based activities, appearance comparison and body dissatisfaction among women. Aesth Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02546-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Menzel JE, Sperry SL, Small B, Thompson JK, Sarwer DB, Cash TF (2011) Internalization of appearance ideals and cosmetic surgery attitudes: a test of the tripartite influence model of body image. Sex Roles 65:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9983-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2019) https://www.surgery.org/media/statistics.April,2019

  9. von Soest T, Kvalem IL, Wichstrøm L (2012) Predictors of cosmetic surgery and its effects on psychological factors and mental health: a population-based follow-up study among Norwegian females. Psychol Med 42(3):617–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711001267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S (1999) Exacting beauty: theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Am Psychol Association Wash DC. https://doi.org/10.1037/10312-000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holland G, Tiggemann M (2016) A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image 17:100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mingoia J, Hutchinson AD, Wilson C, Gleaves DH (2017) The relationship between social networking site use and the internalization of a thin ideal in females: a meta-analytic review. Front Psychol 8:1351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen R, Newton-John T, Slater A (2018) ‘Selfie’-objectification: the role of selfies in self-objectification and disordered eating in young women. Comput Hum Behav 79:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Q (2020) Selfie editing and consideration of cosmetic surgery among young Chinese women: the role of self-objectification and facial dissatisfaction. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01191-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajanala S, Maymone MB, Vashi NA (2018) Selfies—living in the era of filtered photographs. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 20(6):443–444. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maisel A, Waldman A, Poon E, Alam M (2020) Types of cosmetic procedures requested by different types of patients and the reasons for these preferences. Dermatol Surg 46(12):1728–1732. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martel J, Powell E, Murina A (2020) The effect of Instagram and photograph editing on seeking dermatologic care. J Cosmet Dermatol 19(10):2732–2735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen J, Ishii M, Bater KL, Darrach H, Liao D, Huynh PP, Ishii LE (2019) Association between the use of social media and photograph editing applications, self-esteem, and cosmetic surgery acceptance. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21(5):361–367. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodgers RF, Paxton SJ, Wertheim EH (2021) #Take idealized bodies out of picture: a scoping review of social media content aiming to protect and promote positive body image. Body Image 38:10–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiggemann M, Zinoviev K (2019) The effect of #enhancement-free Instagram images and hashtags on women’s body image. Body Image 31:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Politte-Corn M, Fardouly J (2020) #Nomakeupselfie: the impact of natural no-makeup images and positive appearance comments on young women’s body image. Body Image 34:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fardouly J, Rapee RM (2019) The impact of no-makeup selfies on young women’s body image. Body Image 28:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tiggemann M, Anderberg I (2020) Social media is not real: the effect of ‘Instagram versus reality’ images on women’s social comparison and body image. New Media Soc 22(12):2183–2199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tiggemann M, Brown Z, Thomas N (2019) (Don’t) look here!: the effect of different forms of label added to fashion advertisements on women’s visual attention. Body Image 31:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McComb SE, Mills JS (2021) Young women’s body image following upwards comparison to Instagram models: the role of physical appearance perfectionism and cognitive emotion regulation. Body Image 38:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McLean SA, Wertheim EH, Marques MD, Paxton SJ (2019) Dismantling prevention: comparison of outcomes following media literacy and appearance comparison modules in a randomised controlled trial. J Health Psychol 16:396–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316678668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fardouly J, Holland E (2018) Social media is not real life: the effect of attaching disclaimer-type labels to idealized social media images on women’s body image and mood. New Media Soc 20(11):4311–4328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818771083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Livingston J, Holland E, Fardouly J (2020) Exposing digital posing: the effect of social media self-disclaimer captions on women’s body dissatisfaction, mood, and impressions of the user. Body Image 32:150–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bue ACC, Harrison K (2020) Visual and cognitive processing of thin-ideal Instagram images containing idealized or disclaimer comments. Body Image 33:152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiggemann M, Velissaris VG (2020) The effect of viewing challenging “reality check” Instagram comments on women’s body image. Body Image 33:257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bury B, Tiggemann M, Slater A (2016) Disclaimer labels on fashion magazine advertisements: impact on visual attention and relationship with body dissatisfaction. Body Image 16(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodgers RF (2016) The relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and internet use, part II: an integrated theoretical model. Adoles Res Rev 1:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0017-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McHale SM, Dotterer A, Kim J-Y (2009) An ecological perspective on the media and youth development. Am Behav Sci 52(8):1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209331541

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Di Gesto C, Matera C, Nerini A, Policardo GR, Stefanile C (2020) Measure the activities related to images and appearance comparison on Instagram: validation of the Instagram image activity scale and the Instagram appearance comparison scale. Psicol della Salut 3:109–128. https://doi.org/10.3280/PDS2020-003005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stefanile C, Nerini A, Matera C, Schaefer LM, Thompson JK (2019) Validation of an Italian version of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire-4-revised (SATAQ-4R) on non-clinical Italian women and men. Body Image 31(4):48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.08.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schaefer LM, Harriger JA, Heinberg LJ, Soderberg T, Kevin Thompson J (2017) Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire-4-revised (SATAQ-4R). Int J Eat Disord 50(2):104–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Matera C, Nerini A, Stefanile C (2013) Assessing body dissatisfaction: validation of the Italian version of the body shape questionnaire-14 (BSQ-14). Counseling 6:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dowson J, Henderson L (2001) The validity of a short version of the body shape questionnaire. Psychiatry Res 102(3):263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00254-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stefanile C, Nerini A, Matera C (2014) The factor structure and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the acceptance of cosmetic surgery scale. Body Image 11(4):370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Henderson-King D, Henderson-King E (2005) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: scale development and validation. Body Image 2(2):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mora M, Penelo E, Gutiérrez T, Espinoza P, González M, Raich R (2015) Assessment of two school-based programs to prevent universal eating disorders: media literacy and theatre-based methodology in Spanish adolescent boys and girls. Sci World J 2015(1):328753. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/328753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kleemans M, Daalmans S, Carbaat I, Anschütz D (2018) Picture perfect: the direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychol 21:93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Nerini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Ethical Committee of the University of Florence approved the study procedures. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nerini, A., Matera, C., Romani, F. et al. Retouched or Unaltered? That is the Question. Body Image and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery in Young Female Instagram Users. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 1229–1238 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03225-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03225-7

Keywords

Navigation