Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Ultrasound Evolution of Lateral Thoracic Perforator Flaps Design and Harvest for Partial and Total Breast Reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The lateral thoracic area is a known source for perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction. In this paper, we report our experience in designing and harvesting lateral thoracic perforator flaps for partial and total breast reconstruction with the introduction of the “propuller” concept.

Patients and Methods

Between September 2013 and August 2021, 95 flaps were performed for immediate, partial and total breast reconstruction. On a total of 95 flaps, 30 (19 thoracodorsal artery perforator(TDAP) flaps, 10 lateral intercostal artery perforator(LICAP) flaps and 1 lateral thoracic artery perforator(LTAP) flap) were harvested in the traditional fashion (control group) and 65 (57 LICAP, 2 LTAP and 6 TDAP flaps) according to the propeller concept (study group). All cases were preoperatively planned with Color-Coded Duplex Ultrasound.

Results

No flap losses were experienced in both groups. The mean operative time was 156 minutes (range 118–234) for the control group and 75 minutes (range 53–125) for the study group (p < 0.0001). A significantly higher number of LICAP flaps were chosen in the study group compared to control group. None of the patients had donor site complications. Patients’ and Surgeons’ satisfaction was high to very high.

Conclusion

The ultrasound preoperative planning led to the development of an easier and safer method of local perforator flap harvesting, that we named as propuller design. Its novelty lies in that perforator intraoperative selection and fully skeletonization are not needed and a more efficient flap movement (propeller plus advancement) which transfers more tissue into the new breast can be achieved safely, faster and easier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teo TC (2010) The propeller flap concept. Clin Plast Surg 37(4):615–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soumian S, Parmeshwae R, Chandrana M, Marla S, Narayanan S, Shetty G (2020) Chest wall perforator flaps for partial breast reconstruction: Surgical outcomes from a multicenter study. Arch Plast Surg 47(2):153–159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S, Blondeel P (2004) Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept. Br J Plast Surg 57(6):531–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamdi M, Spano A, Van Landuyt K, D’Herde K, Blondeel P, Monstrey S (2008) The lateral intercostal artery perforators: anatomical study and clinical application in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(2):389–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Arruda E, Brasil JA, Aldrighi JM, Gemperli R, Filassi JR, Castro FM (2011) Immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction with perforator flaps: new challenges in the era of partial mastectomy reconstruction? Breast 20(3):233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JW, Kim MC, Park HY, Yang JD (2014) Oncoplastic volume replacement techniques according to the excised volume and tumor location in small- to moderate-sized breasts. Gland Surg 3(1):14–21

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JB, Kim DK, Lee JW, Choi KY, Chung HY, Cho BC, Park HY, Lee JY, Yang JD (2018) The usefulness of pedicled perforator flap in partial breast reconstruction after breast conserving surgery in Korean women. Arch Plast Surg 45(1):29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JB, Eom JR, Lee JW, Lee J, Park HY, Yang JD (2019) Utility of two surgical techniques using a lateral intercostal artery perforator flap after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3):477e–487e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, de Frene B, Roche N, Blondeel P, Monstrey S (2006) The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(6):644–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Visconti G, Bianchi A, Hayashi A, Cina A, Maccauro G, Almadori G, Salgarello M (2020) Thin and superthin perforator flap elevation based on preoperative planning with ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound. Arch Plast Surg 47(4):365–370

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Visconti G, Bianchi A, Hayashi A, Salgarello M (2022) Designing an anterolateral thigh flap using ultrasound. J Reconstr Microsurg 38(3):206–216. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salgarello M, Visconti G (2022) Designing lateral thoracic wall perforator flaps for breast reconstruction using ultrasound. J Reconstr Microsurg 38(3):228–232. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomsen JB, Rindom MB, Rancati A, Angrigiani C (2021) Thoracodorsal artery flaps for breast reconstruction-the variants and its approach. Arch Plast Surg 48(1):15–25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McCulley SJ, Schaverien MV, Tan VK, Macmillan RD (2015) Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(5):686–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JT (2005) New nomenclature concept of perforator flap. Br J Plast Surg 58:431–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JT, Kim SW (2015) perforator flap versus conventional flap. J Korean Med Sci 30(5):514–522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JT, Kim YH, Naidu S (2010) Perfecting the design of the gluteus maximus perforator–based island flap for coverage of buttock defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1744–1751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Visconti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 34435 kb)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 28507 kb)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 25004 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Visconti, G., Bianchi, A., Di Leone, A. et al. The Ultrasound Evolution of Lateral Thoracic Perforator Flaps Design and Harvest for Partial and Total Breast Reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 894–904 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03208-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03208-8

Keywords

Navigation