References
Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K et al (2013) Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):8e–19e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f8a0
Rezai M, Strauß S, Kimmig R, Kern P (2016) Risk-reducing, conservative mastectomy-analysis of surgical outcome and quality of life in 272 implant-based reconstructions using TiLoop(®) Bra versus autologous corial flaps. Gland Surg 5(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.07.03
Eichler C, Schulz C, Thangarajah F, Malter W, Warm M, Brunnert K (2019) A retrospective head-to-head comparison between TiLoop Bra/TiMesh® and Seragyn® in 320 cases of reconstructive breast surgery. Anticancer Res 39(5):2599–2605. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13383
Dieterich M, Dieterich H, Timme S, Reimer T, Gerber B, Stubert J (2012) Using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP(®) Bra) for implant-based breast reconstruction: case report and histological analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):273–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-012-2253-2
Scheidbach H, Tannapfel A, Schmidt U, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2004) Influence of titanium coating on the biocompatibility of a heavyweight polypropylene mesh. An animal experimental model. Eur Surg Res 36(5):313–317. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079917
Scheidbach H, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2004) In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs. Surg Endosc 18(2):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8113-1
Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E (2011) An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg 127(2):514–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0B013E318200A961
Frey JD, Salibian AA, Levine JP, Karp NS, Choi M (2018) Incision choices in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a comparative analysis of outcomes and evolution of a clinical algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(6):826e–835e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004969
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Southwick, G.J., Fried, F.W. “Hook Shape” Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 557–558 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03196-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03196-9