Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of autologous fat graft injection to correct lower eyelid position
Methods
A retrospective, observational, single blind, case—control study was carried out on 94 patients, presenting with lower eyelid retraction in 159 eyes. In the sub-population with monolateral eyelid retraction, the not affected site has been considered as a control and compared with the outcomes recorded after treatment of the contralateral side
Follow-up at 12 months was performed with a subjective assessment carried out by a questionnaire administered to patients while objective result assessment was performed 12 months after surgery by two independent blind examiners.
Results
The eyelid upward reposition has improved one year after fat grafting in both bilateral (1,52 mm) and unilateral (1,7 mm) population: the latter allowed to statistically validate (P<0.05) the result with respect to the not affected site.
Conclusions
This is the first paper that highlights the outcomes of sole fat injection in the treatment of lower eyelid retraction: blind objective evaluation of surgical outcomes along with a patient assessment of both functional and aesthetic improvement one year after surgery confirm its efficacy and reliability along with the first case/control outcome evaluation of the technique carried on in the sub-population of 29 patients affected by unilateral lower eyelid retraction that validate the average improvement of the retracted eyelid one year after fat grafting as statistically significant. Nevertheless, longer follow-up periods and a larger sample size are needed to thoroughly confirm surgical outcomes and statistical results.
Level of evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig7_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig9_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig10_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig11_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig12_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig13_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig14_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig15_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig16_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00266-022-03114-z/MediaObjects/266_2022_3114_Fig17_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISAPS International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ISAPS-Global-Survey-Results-2018-new.pdf; 2018, accessed March 23, 2021.
Patipa M (2000) The evaluation and management of lower eyelid retraction following cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):438–459
Patel A, Wang Y, Massry GG (2019) Management of post blepharoplasty lower eyelid retraction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 27(4):425–434
Barmettler A, Heo M (2018) A prospective, randomized comparison of lower eyelid retraction repair with autologous auricular cartilage, bovine acellular dermal matrix (surgimend), and porcine acellular dermal matrix (enduragen) spacer grafts. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. May/Jun 34(3):266–273
Ben Artsi E, Ullrich K, Malhotra R (2020) Submental and anterior neck originated full-thickness skin grafts for periocular procedures. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. May/Jun 36(3):254–257
Mehta HK (2018) Myotarsal flap - a versatile entity for lower eyelid reconstructions. Orbit 37(3): 223-229 https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2018.1463547.
Chen Y, Al-Sadah Z, Kikkawa DO, Lee BW (2020) A modified hughes flap for correction of refractory cicatricial lower lid retraction with concomitant ectropion. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep/Oct 36(5):503–507
Pascali M, Avantaggiato A, Brinci L, Cervelli V, Carinci F (2015) Tarsal sling: an essential stitch to prevent scleral show in lower blepharoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 35(1):11–19
Pascali M, Avantaggiato A, Brinci L, Cervelli V, Carinci F (2015) Lateral canthal support in prevention of lower eyelid malpositioning in blepharoplasty: the tarsal sling. J Craniofac Surg 26(4):e339–e342
Pascali M, Corsi A, Brinci L, Corsi I, Cervelli V (2014) The tarsal belt procedure for the correction of ectropion: description and outcome in 42 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 98(12):1691–1696
Pascali M, Botti C, Cervelli V, Botti G (2017) Vertical midface lifting with periorbital anchoring in the management of lower eyelid retraction: a 10-year clinical retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(1):33–45
Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2006) Subperiosteal midface lift with or without a hard palate mucosal graft for correction of lower eyelid retraction. Ophthalmology 113(10):1869–1873
Goldberg RA (2017) Discussion: vertical midface lifting with periorbital anchoring in the management of lower eyelid retraction: a 10-year clinical retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(1):46–48
Moe KS, Linder T (2000) The lateral transorbital canthopexy for correction and prevention of ectropion. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2:9–15
Alghoul MS, Vaca EE, Mioton LM (2020) Getting good results in cosmetic blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(1):71e–82e
McCord CD Jr, Shore JW (1983) Avoidance of complications in lower lid blepharoplasty. Ophthalmology 90:1039–1046
Klinger M, Klinger F, Caviggioli F, Maione L, Catania B, Veronesi A, Giannasi S, Bandi V, Giaccone M, Siliprandi M, Barbera F, Battistini A, Lisa A, Vinci V (2020) Fat grafting for treatment of facial scars. Clin Plast Surg 47(1):131–138
Piccolo NS, Piccolo MS, de Paula PN, de Paula PP, de Paula PN, Daher RP, Lobo RP, Daher SP, Sarto Piccolo MT (2020) Fat grafting for treatment of facial burns and burn scars. Clin Plast Surg 47(1):119–130
Pallua N, Kim BS (2020) Microfat and lipoconcentrate for the treatment of facial scars. Clin Plast Surg 47(1):139–145
Gentile P, De Angelis B, Pasin M, Cervelli G, Curcio CB, Floris M, Di Pasquali C, Bocchini I, Balzani A, Nicoli F, Insalaco C, Tati E, Lucarini L, Palla L, Pascali M, De Logu P, Di Segni C, Bottini DJ, Cervelli V (2014) Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells and platelet-rich plasma: basic and clinical evaluation for cell-based therapies in patients with scars on the face. J Craniofac Surg 25(1):267–272
Kim KH, Baek JS, Lee S et al (2017) Causes and surgical outcomes of lower eyelid retraction. Korean J Ophthalmol 31(4):290–298
Galindo-Ferreiro A, Fernandez E, Weill D et al (2019) A web-based survey of oculoplastic surgeons regarding the management of lower lid retraction. Semin Ophthalmol 34(3):125–130
Tao JP, Aakalu VK, Wladis EJ et al (2020) Bioengineered acellular dermal matrix spacer grafts for lower eyelid retraction repair: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 127(5):689–695
Rohrich RJ, Mohan R (2020) Preventing lateral canthal malposition in modern blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(2):324e–328e
Botti G, Botti C, Rossati L et al (2019) “Dynamic canthopexy” drill hole canthal repositioning. Aesthet Surg J 39(12):1284–1294
Maffi TR, Chang S, Friedland JA (2011) Traditional lower blepharoplasty: is additional support necessary? A 30-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(1):265–273
Pascali M, Botti C, Cervelli V, Botti G (2015) Midface rejuvenation: a critical evaluation of a 7-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(5):1305–1316
Riesco B, Abascal C, Duarte A et al (2018) Autologous fat transfer with SEFFI (superficial enhanced fluid fat injection) technique in periocular reconstruction. Orbit 37(3):191–195
Skippen B, Bernardini FP, Fezza J, Hartstein ME (2016) Autologous fat grafting for treating blepharoplasty-induced lower eyelid retraction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(12):e1190
Le TP, Peckinpaugh J, Naficy S, Amadi AJ (2014) Effect of autologous fat injection on lower eyelid position. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 30(6):504–507
Shue S, Kurlander DE, Guyuron B (2018) Fat injection: a systematic review of injection volumes by facial subunit. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(5):1261–1270
Schultz KP, Raghuram A, Davis MJ, Abu-Ghname A, Chamata E, Rohrich RJ (2020) Fat grafting for facial rejuvenation. Semin Plast Surg 34(1):30–37
Pascali M, Quarato D, Pagnoni M, Carinci F (2017) Tear trough deformity: study of filling procedures for its correction. J Craniofac Surg 28(8):2012–2015
Peckinpaugh JL, Reddy HS, Tower RN (2010) Large particle hyaluronic Acid gel for the treatment of lower eyelid retraction associated with radiation-induced lipoatrophy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 26(5):377–379
Xi W, Han S, Feng S et al (2019) The injection for the lower eyelid retraction: a mechanical analysis of the lifting effect of the hyaluronic acid. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(5):1310–1317
Diaspro A, Sito G (2020) Hyaluronic acid for lower eyelid and tear trough rejuvenation: review of the literature. Plast Aesthet Res 7:62
Eto H, Kato H, Suga H, Aoi N, Doi K, Kuno S, Yoshimura K (2012) The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2b19
Kato H, Mineda K, Eto H, Doi K, Kuno S, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Yoshimura K (2014) Degeneration regeneration and cicatrization after fat grafting: dynamic total tissue remodeling during the first 3 months. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000066
Doi K, Ogata F, Eto H, Kato H, Kuno S, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Feng J, Manabe I, Yoshimura K (2015) Differential contributions of graft-derived and host-derived cells in tissue regeneration/remodeling after fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001292
Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Peeters G, Hamdi M, Cornelissen M, Declercq H (2013) Nanofat grafting: basic research and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):1017–1026
Cohen SR, Hewett S, Ross L, Fischer M, Saad A, Teubel S, Delaunay F (2020) Progressive improvement in midfacial volume 18 to 24 months after simultaneous fat grafting and facelift: an insight to fat graft remodeling. Aesthet Surg J 40(3):235–242
Rigotti G, Chirumbolo S, Sbarbati A (2020) Commentary on: progressive improvement in midfacial volume 18 to 24 months after simultaneous fat grafting and facelift: an insight to fat graft remodeling. Aesthet Surg J 40(3):243–245
Pelle-Ceravolo M, Angelini M (2020) Properly diluted fat (PDF): an easy and safe approach to periocular fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 40(1):19–33
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Giulia Tanteri MD, an independent medical writer, who provided English-language editing and journal styling prior to submission
Funding
Not applicable
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 The video presents Patient 2 before, and her outcome one year after fat grafting of retracted lower eyelid. Animated figures describe the mechanism of lower eyelid retraction and the effect of fat grafting, along with a surgical video of the injection technique, with technical description.
266_2022_3114_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file2 Lower eyelid retraction in the study population n=159: preoperative image (T0) compared with one-year postoperative image (T1). Wilcoxon test of Paired t test data.
266_2022_3114_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file3 Lower eyelid retraction in the monolateral eyelid retraction group n=29: preoperative image (T0) compared with one-year postoperative image (T1). Wilcoxon test of Paired t test data.
266_2022_3114_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file4 Statistical evaluation of Lower eyelid retraction treatment outcomes in the monolateral eyelid retraction group n=29: preoperative image (T0) with one-year postoperative image (T1). The statistical significance threshold was set at p<0.05. Wilcoxon test of Paired t test data 2.
266_2022_3114_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file5 Case—control evaluation made in the monolateral eyelid retraction group n=29, comparing the one-year outcome of the treated side (case) with the healthy eyelid (control). The statistical significance threshold set at p<0.05. Wilcoxon test of Paired t test data
266_2022_3114_MOESM6_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file6 Statistical evaluation made in the study population (n=94), comparing the one-year outcome with the preoperative image. The statistical significance threshold set at p<0.05.
266_2022_3114_MOESM7_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file7 Case—control evaluation made in the monolateral eyelid retraction group (n=29), comparing the one-year outcome of the treated side (case) with the healthy eyelid (control). The statistical significance threshold set at p<0.05.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pascali, M., Marchese, G. & Diaspro, A. Fat Injection as a Valuable Tool for Lower Eyelid Retraction Management: A Retrospective, Observational, Single Blind and Case—Control Study. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 235–244 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03114-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03114-z