Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soft and Hard Tissue Changes and Facial Rejuvenation of Anterior Maxillary Segmental Osteotomy: A Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Study

  • Original Article
  • Maxillofacial/Craniofacial
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To explore the efficacy of anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy (AMSO) in reliving maxillary protrusion and better analyze the three-dimensional (3D) morphological changes of the postoperative nasolabial region using computed tomography (CT) and evaluate the trend of facial rejuvenation.

Materials and Methods

Forty-five patients who underwent AMSO from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively included. CT and oriented photography were performed before and 10 months after the treatment. The mimics17.0 software was used to reconstruct the 3D CT scan results before and after the operation, measure the data of each anatomical index, and systematically evaluate the soft tissue changes in the nasolabial region. The patients themselves, the plastic surgeons, family members, or friends of patients use the Face-Q Age Appraisal Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate the changes in patients’ visual age before and after the operation.

Results

Forty-five cases of maxillary protrusion were alleviated. Seen from the side, the protruding degree of the upper lip is obviously reduced. In the front view, ∠Cont-Sbal-F, the width of alar base, and alae nasi all increased significantly. Contrary to traditional perceptions, the protrusion and height of the nose tip actually increased rather than decreased after AMSO. The visual age score improved positively, and patients obtained facial rejuvenation. No serious complications occurred; after 10-month follow-up, we achieved a high degree of satisfaction.

Conclusion

AMSO can significantly improve the maxillary protrusion, and it can increase the protrusion and height of the nose tip. Also, patients can get a younger appearance. Comprehensive preoperative evaluation and postoperative nasolabial morphology with maxillary protrusion patients are helpful for correct clinical decision-making. At the same time, the operation suggests a new choice of facial rejuvenation for patients with maxillary protrusion.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ewing M, Ross R (1992) Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty. Am J orthod dentofacial orthoped: off publ Am Associat Orthod constituent societ Am Board Orthod 101(6):550–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hellal U, Fayed N, Elsharkawy R et al (2018) Rapid anterior segmental maxillary retraction by compression osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 29(2):315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao J, Song G, Zong X et al (2018) Volumetric mandibular change after angle ostectomy and outer cortex grinding. J cranio-maxillo-facial surge:off publicat Europ Associat Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 46(3):432–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta A, Sharma S, Kataria V et al (2020) experience with anterior maxillary osteotomy techniques: a prospective study of 20 cases. J maxillofac oral surg 19(1):119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang L, Xiao Y, Liang Y et al (2017) Does the surgery-first approach produce better outcomes in orthognathic surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofc Surg 75(11):2422–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shawky MM, El-Ghareeb TI, Hummos L (2012) Evaluation of the three-dimensional soft tissue changes after anterior segmental maxillary osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(6):718–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Panchapakesan V, Klassen A, Cano S et al (2013) Development and psychometric evaluation of the face-q aging appraisal scale and patient-perceived age visual analog scale. Aesthetic Surg J 33(8):1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Soverina D, Gasparini G, Pelo S et al (2019) Skeletal stability in orthognathic surgery with the surgery first approach: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(7):930–940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Metzler P, Geiger EJ, Chang CC et al (2014) Assessment of three-dimensional nasolabial response to Le Fort I advancement. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(6):756–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seon S, Lee H, Jeong B et al (2020) Study of soft tissue changes in the upper lip and nose after backward movement of the Maxilla in orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(6):385–392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rupperti S, Winterhalder P, Krennmair S et al (2022) Changes in the facial soft tissue profile after maxillary orthognathic surgery. J orofacial orthoped = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie: Organ/official J Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie 83(3):215–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhagat S, Kannan S, Babu M et al (2019) Soft Tissue Changes Following Combined Anterior Segmental Bimaxillary Orthognathic Procedures. J Maxillof Oral Surg 18(1):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohanty S, Kumari S, Kohli S et al (2021) Anterior segmental osteotomies without orthodontics: practicability of the correction of dentoalveolar deformities. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59(3):292–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. K R H, N S, CHRISTOPHER S, et al. (2014) Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes after Anterior Segmental Osteotomy. J Clinical and Diagnostic res:JCDR, 8(9): p. ZC07-10.

  15. Khamashta-Ledezma L, Naini F (2015) Prospective Assessment of Maxillary Advancement Effects:Maxillary Incisor Exposure, and Upper Lip and Nasal Changes. Am J orthod dentofacial orthoped:official publ Am Associat of Orthod, its constituent societies, and the Am Board Orthod 147(4):454–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A Stewart, R Edler (2011) Efficacy and Stability of the Alar Base Cinch Suture. Br J Oral maxillofacial surgery. 49(8): 623-6.

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by CAMS-Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (No.2020-I2M-C&T-A-018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaolei Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest and received.

Human or Animal Rights

The privacy rights of human subjects were observed.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Zhao, F., Du, L. et al. Soft and Hard Tissue Changes and Facial Rejuvenation of Anterior Maxillary Segmental Osteotomy: A Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Study. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 271–281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03063-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03063-7

Keywords

Navigation