Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Factors for Capsular Contracture in Alloplastic Reconstructive and Augmentation Mammaplasty: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Capsular contracture is the most common complication of breast augmentation and reconstruction. It occurs in up to 45% of patients and is theorized to occur secondary to an immune reaction. It can lead to pain, dissatisfaction with aesthetic outcomes, and reoperation. The gold standard for management is capsulectomy. Prior similar studies are limited by narrow inclusion criteria, single-surgeon analysis, small sample size, or univariate analysis. The goal of the following study is to prospectively identify possible risk factors for capsular contracture using a national database.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing periprosthetic and/or total capsulectomy for capsular contracture from 2013 to 2016. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for variables using a multivariable binary logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 6547 patients underwent reconstructive or augmentation mammaplasty with a prosthetic implant, out of which 2543 (39%) underwent capsulectomy. Capsular contracture was more likely in older (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09–1.10, p<.001), overweight (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.10–1.13, p<.001), and cancer patients (OR: 7.71, 95% CI: 2.22–28.8, p=0.001). Wound infection was associated with capsulectomy (OR: 6.69, 95% CI: 1.74–25.8, p<.001). Conclusion: These identified risk factors should be comprehensively addressed with patients during the informed consent process before breast augmentation or reconstruction with implants.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2020) Plastic surgery statistics report. ASPS national clearinghouse of plastic surgery procedural statistics.

  2. Malahias M, Jordan DJ, Hughes LC, Hindocha S, Juma A (2016) A literature review and summary of capsular contracture: an ongoing challenge to breast surgeons and their patients. Int J Surg Open 3:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):532–543

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachour Y, Bargon CA, de Blok CJM, Ket JCF, Ritt MJPF, Niessen FB (2018) Risk factors for developing capsular contracture in women after breast implant surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(9):e29–e48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, Godinez T, Beckstrand M (2018) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:20S-28S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK (2017) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving natrelle 410 formstable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egeberg A, Sørensen JA (2016) The impact of breast implant location on the risk of capsular contraction. Ann Plast Surg 77(2):255–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ajdic D, Zoghbi Y, Gerth D, Panthaki ZJ, Thaller S (2016) The relationship of bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 36(3):297–309

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Galdiero M, Larocca F, Iovene MR et al (2018) Microbial evaluation in capsular 13 contracture of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Berry C, Hunsicker LM (2016) Acellular dermal matrixassisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(2):329–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL (2012) Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32(4):456–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marques M, Brown SA, Oliveira I et al (2010) Long-term follow-up of breast capsule contracture rates in cosmetic and reconstructive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(3):769778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH (2013) Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(9):1165–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Largent JA, Reisman NR, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Jewell ML (2013) Clinical trial outcomes of high-and extra high-profile breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 33(4):529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dancey A, Nassimizadeh A, Levick P (2012) Capsular contracture-What are the risk factors? A 14 year series of 1400 consecutive augmentations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(2):213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Serritzlev MS, Lorentzen AK, Matthiessen LW, Hölmich LR (2020) Capsular contracture in patients with prior breast augmentation undergoing breast conserving therapy and irradiation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 54(4):225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth R. Thaller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Thaller receives royalties from Thieme and Springer Publishers.

Human or Animal Participant

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A., Picado, O., Mathew, P.J. et al. Risk Factors for Capsular Contracture in Alloplastic Reconstructive and Augmentation Mammaplasty: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 1678–1682 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02972-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02972-x

Keywords

Navigation