Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Machine Learning-Based Model for Breast Volume Prediction Using Preoperative Anthropometric Measurements

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Accurate assessment of breast volume is helpful in preoperative planning and intraoperative judgment in both cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. In this prospective study, a formula was derived using machine learning algorithm (Gradient Boosted Model).

Method

A prospective study was performed on 39 female-to-male transgender patients. Bilateral mastectomy was done for all patients. Preoperative anthropometric measurements were performed on 78 breasts of these patients. Weight of breasts was calculated postoperatively with digital scale (weight), and then volume of breasts was calculated with the calibrated container (water displacement technique). Authors built a model based on Python CatBoostClassifier. Finally, an android application was built for ease of real-time utilization.

Results

Eight anthropometric measurements were collected preoperatively as independent variables. Breast vertical perimeter at lower half, upper pole, sternal notch to nipple and nipple to IMF had most correlation with volume and weight. Based on machine learning model, the following formula established: Breast volume = (breast width) × 24.69 + (nipple to IMF) × 49.03 − (sternal notch to nipple) × 1.34 + (anterior axillary line to medial border) × 6.57 − (upper pole) × 1.27 − (chest perimeter IMF) × 5.63 + (chest perimeter nipple) × 10.40 + (breast vertical perimeter at lower half) × 9.20 − 1133.74. The R2 of the model is 0.93, and RMSE is 62.4.

Conclusion

Our formula is an accurate method for preoperative breast volume assessment. We built an android App (Breast Volume Predictor) for the real-time utilization of resulting formula. It is available at Google Play Store for free download.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herold C, Ueberreiter K, Busche MN et al (2013) Autologous fat transplantation: volumetric tools for estimation of volume survival. A systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:380–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M et al (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Killaars RC, Preuβ MLG, de Vos Camille NJP, van Berlo CJLY, Lobbes MBI, van der Hulst RRWJ, Piatkowski AA (2020) Clinical assessment of breast volume: can 3D imaging be the gold standard? Plast Reconstr Surg Golb Open 8(11):1158

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(6):851–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edsander-Nord Å, Wickman M, Jurell G (1996) Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 30:129–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulstrode N, Bellamy E, Shrotria S (2001) Breast volume assessment: comparing five different techniques. Breast 10:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayar R, Civelek S, Cobanoglu M, O gungor, H Catal, M emiroglu, (2011) Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases. Breast Cancer: Basic Clin Res 5:BCBCR-S6128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorogush AV, Ershov V, Gulin A (2018) CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv:1810.11363

  9. Karwasra I, Beniwal A (2018) Breast volume estimation by anthropometry. J Med Sci Clin Res 6(1):32622–32628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henseler H, Hille-Betz U, Vogt PM (2015) Validation of subjective estimates of female breast volume and comparison with objective methods. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 47(6):371–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bauman FG (1970) Volumetric measurement of the human breast and breast tissue before and during mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23:263–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eric M, Anderla A, Stefanovic D, Drapsin M (2014) Breast volume estimation from systemic series of CT scans using the Cavalieri principle and 3D reconstruction. Int J Surg 12(9):912–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palin WE Jr, von Fraunhofer JA, Smith DJ Jr (1986) Measurement of breast volume: comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 77(2):253–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caruso MK, Guillot TS, Nguyen T, Frank L (2006) Greenway the cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesth Plast Surg 30:16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J (1999) Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. AJR 173(6):1643–1649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chae MP, Rozen WM, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ (2016) Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques. Glan Surg 5(2):212–226

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mahmoud EO, Hosna AM, Bothaina A, Mohamed ES (2006) Assessment of the breast volume by a new simple formula. Indian J Plast Surg 39(1):13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qiao Q, Zhou G, Ling YC (1997) Breast volume measurement in young Chinese women and clinical applications. Aesth Plast Surg 21:362–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropometric measurement. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(2):313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghojogh B, Crowley M (2019) The theory behind overfitting, cross validation, regularization, bagging and boosting: tutorial. arXiv:1905.12787

  21. Longo B, Farcomeni A, Ferri G, Campanale A, Sorotos M, Santanelli F (2013) The BREAST-V: a unifying predictive formula for volume assessment in small, medium, and large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):1e–7e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? Arguments against avoiding RMSE in literature. Geosci Model Dev 7:1247–1250

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhosein Rahmani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the IR.IUMS.REC under the approval number: IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1399.343

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akhoondinasab, M., shafaei, Y., Rahmani, A. et al. A Machine Learning-Based Model for Breast Volume Prediction Using Preoperative Anthropometric Measurements. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 243–249 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02937-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02937-0

Navigation