Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on Comparison of Classic Mastopexy Method with Double-Pedicled Auto-augmentation Mastopexy with Conic-Shaped Modified Inferior Butterfly Flap

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Altınel D, Serin M, Toplu G (2022) Comparison of classic mastopexy method with double-pedicled auto-augmentation mastopexy with conic-shaped modified inferior butterfly flap. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02816-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yilmaz KB (2021) A modified superior pedicle mastopexy technique with an inferolateral-based auto augmentation flap. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(3):884–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02127-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atiyeh B, Ghieh F, Chahine F, Oneisi A (2022) Ptosis and bottoming out following mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Is synthetic mesh internal breast support the solution? A systematic review of the literature. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graf R, Biggs TM, Steely RL (2000) Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesthet Plast Surg 24(5):348–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams WP Jr, Moses AC (2017) Use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh to optimize soft-tissue support in mastopexy: a single-site study. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ors S (2016) Autoaugmentation mastopexy modification prevents bottoming-out deformity and areola distortion: a preliminary report. Aesthet Plast Surg 40(4):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0652-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atiyeh B, Ibrahim A, Saba S, Karamanoukian R, Chahine F, Papazian N (2017) The inframammary fold (IMF): a poorly appreciated landmark in prosthetic/alloplastic breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery-personal experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(4):806–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0854-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Atiyeh BS, Rubeiz MT, Hayek SN (2005) Refinements of vertical scar mammaplasty: circumvertical skin excision design with limited inferior pole subdermal undermining and liposculpture of the inframammary crease. Aesthet Plast Surg 29(6):519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0093-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadi Ghieh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atiyeh, B., Ghieh, F. Comment on Comparison of Classic Mastopexy Method with Double-Pedicled Auto-augmentation Mastopexy with Conic-Shaped Modified Inferior Butterfly Flap. Aesth Plast Surg 47 (Suppl 1), 32–36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02881-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02881-z

Navigation