Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on “Comparison of Endoscopic Transaxillary and Periareolar Approaches in Breast Augmentation with Smooth Implants”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Reference

  1. Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL (2012) Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J / Am Soci Aesthet Plastic Surg 32(4):456–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen HH, To LT (2021) Comparison of endoscopic transaxillary and peri-areolar approaches in breast augmentation with smooth implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(6):2665–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest to disclose

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shangshan Li.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

Informed Consent

Informed consent is not required for this type of article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S. Comment on “Comparison of Endoscopic Transaxillary and Periareolar Approaches in Breast Augmentation with Smooth Implants”. Aesth Plast Surg 47 (Suppl 1), 8–9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02786-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02786-x

Navigation