Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patients Decision-Making Characteristics Affects Gynecomastia Treatment Satisfaction: A Multicenter Study Using the BODY-Q Chest Module

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jørgensen MG, Cho BY, Hansen FG et al (2021) Patients decision-making characteristics affects gynecomastia treatment satisfaction: a multicenter study using the BODY-Q chest module. Aesth Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02633-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Innocenti A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2021) Gynecomastia and chest masculinization: an updated comprehensive reconstructive algorithm. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(5):2118–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02275-7 (Epub 2021 May 3 PMID: 33939025)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Innocenti A, Melita D, Mori F, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “postero-inferior pedicle surgical technique for the treatment of grade III gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(3):747–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0849-4 (Epub 2017 Apr 3 PMID: 28374294)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Innocenti A, Ciancio F, Francesco M, Melita D, Innocenti M (2017) Comment to “no-drain single incision liposuction pull-through technique for gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(4):990–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0821-3 (Epub 2017 Feb 15 PMID: 28204934)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Innocenti A, Melita D, Innocenti M (2018) Evaluation of glandular liposculpture as a single treatment for grades I and II gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(6):1707–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1156-4 (Epub 2018 Jun 4 PMID: 29869229)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Innocenti A, Melita D, Ciancio F, Innocenti M (2017) Discussion: “long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia.” Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(5):1242–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0866-3 (Epub 2017 Apr 3 PMID: 28374297)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Giacomo Matteotti 42, 50132, Florence, Italy

    Alessandro Innocenti & Dario Melita

Authors
  1. Alessandro Innocenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dario Melita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Innocenti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Human or animals participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Innocenti, A., Melita, D. Patients Decision-Making Characteristics Affects Gynecomastia Treatment Satisfaction: A Multicenter Study Using the BODY-Q Chest Module. Aesth Plast Surg 46 (Suppl 1), 50–51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02688-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02688-4

Search

Navigation