Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Breast Implant Illness (BII): Real Syndrome or a Social Media Phenomenon? A Narrative Review of the Literature

  • Review
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast implant illness (BII) is a condition characterized by elusive diagnostic criteria and self-reported diverse disabling and distressing physical and psychological symptoms. With currently significant increase in public awareness, BII is perhaps becoming the most controversial subject in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, generating heated debates between those who do not believe such a condition exists and those who demand its acceptance as a recognized diagnosis. Silicone incompatibility has been associated with “autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants” (ASIA syndrome) or Shoenfeld's syndrome. It is still unclear, however, whether BII symptoms would have occurred if no implants had been placed in the first place. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze critically the current state of scientific evidence related to this condition. Though the psychosomatic theory is most likely, the mechanism of BII symptoms is probably multifactorial. At present, BII being an underlying connective tissue disorder cannot be confirmed; moreover, whether improved aesthetic outcome and patient’s overall satisfaction with the profile of their reconstructed or augmented breasts translate into decreased self-reported BII symptoms is still not well elucidated.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouhadana G, Chocron Y, Azzi AJ, Davison PG (2020) Perception of implants among breast reconstruction patients in Montreal. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(9):e3116

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Marano AA, Cohen MH, Ascherman JA (2020) Resolution of systemic rheumatologic symptoms following breast implant removal. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(5):e2828

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Newby JM, Tang S, Faasse K, Sharrock MJ, Adams WP (2020) Understanding breast implant illness. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa329 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33247711)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan J, Rohrich R (2021) Breast implant illness: a topic in review. Gland Surg 10(1):430–443

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nanayakkara PW, de Blok CJ (2016) Silicone gel breast implants: what we know about safety after all these years. Ann Intern Med 164:199–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abi-Rafeh J, Safran T, Al-Halabi B, Dionisopolous T (2019) Death by implants: critical analysis of the FDA-MAUDE database on breast implant-related Mortality. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(12):e2554

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Song WJ, Kang SG, Seo BF, Choi NK, Lee JH (2020) A systematic review of the national breast implant registry for application in Korea: can we predict “unpredictable” complications? Medicina (Kaunas) 56(8):370

    Google Scholar 

  8. Magnusson MR, Cooter RD, Rakhorst H, McGuire PA, Adams WP Jr, Deva AK (2019) Breast implant illness: a way forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 143 (3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma): 74S-81S

  9. Brawer AE (2017) Destiny rides again: the reappearance of silicone gel-filled breast implant toxicity. Lupus 26(10):1060–1063

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chi D, Ha AY, Keane G, Myckatyn TM (2021) Discussion: a national survey to assess the population’s perception of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implant illness. Plast Reconstr Surg 147(4):804–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranieri J, Fiasca F, Guerra F, Perilli E, Mattei A, Di Giacomo D (2021) Examining the post-operative well-being of women who underwent mammoplasty: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychiatry 12:645102

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC 2nd, Butler CE, Clemens MW (2019) US FDA breast implant postapproval studies: long-term outcomes in 99,993 patients. Ann Surg 269(1):30–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lachmansingh DA (2019) Breast Implant Illness And Psychiatric Implications. Ir J Psychol Med 4:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adidharma W, Latack KR, Colohan SM, Morrison SD, Cederna PS (2020) Breast implant illness: are social media and the internet worrying patients sick? Plast Reconstr Surg 145(1):225e–227e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee M, Ponraja G, McLeod K, Chong S (2020) Breast implant illness: a biofilm hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(4):e2755

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wee CE, Younis J, Isbester K, Smith A, Wangler B, Sarode AL, Patil N, Grunzweig K, Boas S, Harvey DJ, Kumar AR, Feng LJ (2020) Understanding breast implant illness, before and after explantation: a patient-reported outcomes study. Ann Plast Surg 85(S1 Suppl 1):S82–S86

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Colaris MJL, Cohen Tervaert JW, Ponds RWHM, Wilmink J, van der Hulst RRWJ (2021) Subjective cognitive functioning in silicone breast implant patients: a cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(2):e3394

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Siling Y, Klietz ML, Harren AK, Wei Q, Hirsch T, Aitzetmüller MM (2021) Understanding breast implant illness: etiology is the key. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab197 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33871569)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miseré RML, Colaris MJL, van der Hulst RRWJ (2020) The prevalence of self-reported health complaints and health-related quality of life in women with breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa207

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Balk EM, Earley A, Avendano EA, Raman G (2016) Long-term health outcomes in women with silicone gel breast implants. A Syst Rev Ann Intern Med 164:164–175

    Google Scholar 

  21. Colaris MJL, de Boer M, van der Hulst RR, Cohen Tervaert JW (2017) Two hundreds cases of ASIA syndrome following silicone implants: a comparative study of 30 years and a review of current literature. Immunol Res 65(1):120–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoo T, Proudman S, Limaye V (2019) Silicone breast implants and depression, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome in a rheumatology clinic population. Clin Rheumatol 38(5):1271–1276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shoaib BO, Patten BM (1994) An MS-like syndrome in women with silicone breast implants or silicone uid injections in breast. Neurology 44:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mcguire PA, Haws MJ, Nahai F (2019) Breast implant illness: how can we help? Aesthet Surg J 39(11):1260–1263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rohrich RJ, Kaplan J, Dayan E (2019) Silicone implant illness: science versus myth? Plast Reconstr Surg 144(1):98–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duvic M, Moore D, Menter A et al (1995) Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in association with silicone breast implants. J Am Acad Dermatol 32:939–942

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. FDA (2011) Update on the Safety of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration, June 2011

  28. Bragazzi NL, Hejly A, Watad A, Adawi M, Amital H, Shoenfeld Y (2020) ASIA syndrome and endocrine autoimmune disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 34(1):101412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Caravantes-Cortes MI, Roldan-Valadez E, Zwojewski-Martinez RD, Salazar-Ruiz SY, Carballo-Zarate AA (2020) Breast prosthesis syndrome: pathophysiology and management algorithm. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(5):1423–1437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen Tervaert JW, Kappel RM (2013) Silicone implant incompatibility syndrome (SIIS): a frequent cause of ASIA (Shoenfeld’s Syndrome). Immunol Res 56(2–3):293–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N (2011) “ASIA”—autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. J Autoimmun 36:4–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuzzard SK, Teixeira R, Zinn R (2019) A review of the literature on the management of silicone implant incompatibility syndrome. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(5):1145–1149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Calobrace MB, Mays C (2021) An algorithm for the management of explantation surgery. Clin Plast Surg 48(1):1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang SY, Israel JS, Afifi AM (2017) Breast implant illness: symptoms, patient concerns, and the power of social media. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:765e–766e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jewell ML, Jewell HL (2019) Breast implant-associated illness: medicine by belief, so says Dr. Google. Aesthet Surg J 39(4):NP87–NP89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lund H (2021) Commentary on: understanding breast implant illness. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Azzi AJ, Almadani Y, Davison P (2021) A national survey to assess the population’s perception of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implant illness. Plast Reconstr Surg 147(4):795–803

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097

  39. ASPS Evidence Rating Scales (2011). www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/medical-professionals/health-policy/evidence-practice/ASPS-Rating-Scale-March-2011.pdf.

  40. NIH Study Quality Assessment Tool—Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies (2014). https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.

  41. Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Watad A, Rosenberg V, Tiosano S, Cohen Tervaert JW, Yavne Y, Shoenfeld Y, Shalev V, Chodick G, Amital H (2018) Silicone breast implants and the risk of autoimmune/rheumatic disorders: a real-world analysis. Int J Epidemiol 47(6):1846–1854

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sánchez-Guerrero J, Colditz GA, Karlson EW, Hunter DJ, Speizer FE, Liang MH (1995) Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases and symptoms. N Engl J Med 332(25):1666–1670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fryzek JP, Signorello LB, Hakelius L, Feltelius N, Ringberg A, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Nyren O (2001) Self-reported symptoms among women after cosmetic breast implant and breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(1):206–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT (2020) Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Syn Meth. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tenenbaum SA, Rice JC, Espinoza LR, Cuéllar ML, Plymale DR, Sander DM, Williamson LL, Haislip AM, Gluck OS, Tesser JR (1997) Use of antipolymer antibody assay in recipients of silicone breast implants. Lancet 349 (9050): 449–54. Erratum in: Lancet 349 (9064): 1558

  47. Steve AK, Temple-Oberle C, Yeung JK, Lafreniere AS, Harrop AR (2021) “You helped create this, help me now”: a qualitative analysis of patients’ concerns about breast implants and a proposed strategy for moving forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 147(1):16e–24e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Keane G, Chi D, Ha AY, Myckatyn TM (2021) En bloc capsulectomy for breast implant illness: a social media phenomenon? Aesthet Surg J 41(4):448–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Breast Implant Illness (2021) Breast implant illness—Symptoms, explant, surgeons and detoxification. https://healingbreastimplantillness.com. Accessed 14 April 2021

  50. Colaris MJL, van der Hulst RR, Tervaert JWC (2017) Vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor for the development of autoantibodies in patients with ASIA and silicone breast implants: a cohort study and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 36(5):981–993

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Razavi M, Primavera R, Vykunta A, Thakor AS (2021) Silicone-based bioscaffolds for cellular therapies. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 119:111615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cohen Tervaert JW, Colaris MJ, van der Hulst RR (2017) Silicone breast implants and autoimmune rheumatic diseases: myth or reality. Curr Opin Rheumatol 29(4):348–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Clemens MW, Nava MB, Rocco N, Miranda RN (2017) Understanding rare adverse sequelae of breast implants: anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, late seromas, and double capsules. Gland Surg 6(2):169–184

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Hallab NJ, Samelko L, Hammond D (2021) Particulate debris released from breast implant surfaces are highly dependent on implant type. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab051 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33564817)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hallab NJ, Cunningham BW, Jacobs JJ (2003) Spinal implant debris-induced osteolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(20):S125–S138

    Google Scholar 

  56. Campbell A, Brautbar N, Vojdani A (1994) Suppressed natural killer cell activity in patients with silicone breast implants: reversal upon explantation. Toxicol Ind Health 10:149–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bartok B, Firestein GS (2010) Fibroblast-like synoviocytes: key effector cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Immunol Rev 233:233–255

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Swanson E (2020) Breast implant illness, biofilm, and the role of capsulectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(7):e2999

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahern M, Smith M, Chua H et al (2002) Breast implants and illness: a model of psychological illness. Ann Rheum Dis 61:659

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Dush DM (2001) Breast implants and illness: a model of psychological factors. Ann Rheum Dis 60(7):653–657

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Jacobsen PH, Hölmich LR, McLaughlin JK, Johansen C, Olsen JH, Kjøller K, Friis S (2004) Mortality and suicide among Danish women with cosmetic breast implants. Arch Intern Med 164(22):2450–2455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Balk EM, Raman G (2016) Long-term health outcomes in women with silicone gel breast implants. Ann Intern Med 165:527–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zaborski D, Rzepa T, Pastucha M, Modrzejewski A, Grzesiak W (2019) Neuroticism level and life satisfaction in women undergoing breast augmentation surgery (a preliminary report). Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(2):521–530

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. de Boer M, Colaris M, van der Hulst RRWJ, Cohen Tervaert JW (2017) Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints? Immunol Res 65(1):25–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Valente DS, Zanella RK, Mulazzani CM, Valente SS (2021) Risk factors for explantation of breast implants: a cross-sectional study. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa352 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33649754)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. McGuire PA (2021) Commentary on: en bloc capsulectomy for breast implant illness: a social media phenomenon? Aesthet Surg J 41(4):460–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Peters W, Smith D, Fornasier V et al (1997) An outcome analysis of 100 women after explantation of silicone gel breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 39(1):9–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Melmed EP (1998) A review of explantation in 240 symptomatic women: a description of explantation and capsulectomy with reconstruction using a periareolar technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(5):1364–1373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM, Adams WP et al (2000) A prospective analysis of patients undergoing silicone breast implant explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(7):2529–2537

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Patel A, Blackmore K, Carruthers R (2020) The integrated treatment for chronic pain and anxiety in a patient with breast implant illness symptoms: a case report. Integr Med (Encinitas) 19(4):28–33

    Google Scholar 

  71. Maijers MC, de Blok CJ, Niessen FB, van der Veldt AA, Ritt MJ, Winters HA, Kramer MH, Nanayakkara PW (2013) Women with silicone breast implants and unexplained systemic symptoms: a descriptive cohort study. Neth J Med 71(10):534–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Bishara Atiyeh & Saif Emsieh

Authors
  1. Bishara Atiyeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saif Emsieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saif Emsieh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human or Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atiyeh, B., Emsieh, S. Breast Implant Illness (BII): Real Syndrome or a Social Media Phenomenon? A Narrative Review of the Literature. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 43–57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02428-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02428-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation