A Novel Modification of Tongue in Groove Technique (Auto-Septal Projection Graft) in Rhinoplasty

Abstract

Introduction

Derotation of the nasal tip with narrow nasolabial angle is a common nasal deformity that leads to a long nose appearance, named drooping nose. In these patients, there are various techniques described to fix droopy tip and to achieve a desirable nasal tip rotation such as caudal septal extension graft, extended columellar strut graft, tongue in groove, columellar strut graft, and tip rotation sutures. This study aimed to evaluate changes in nasal tip support after modified tongue-in-groove technique (auto-septal projection graft).

Materials and Methods

Forty-two patients who underwent a primary open approach septorhinoplasty using the modified tongue-in-groove technique between June 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative and preoperative photographs were analyzed, and nasolabial angle and the nasal tip projection ratio were recorded and compared before and average of 17.3 months after the surgery.

Results

Forty-two patients (33 female and 9 male) were included the study. The mean nasolabial angle was 85.7° preoperatively and 99.3° postoperatively. The nasal tip projection ratio was 0.60 preoperatively and 0.64 postoperatively. Both the tip rotation and the tip projection increased significantly after the modified tongue in groove (p<0.05).

Conclusion

It seems that modified tongue-in-groove method (auto-septal projection graft) is an effective technique in maintaining tip projection and rotation in rhinoplasty and safe method to correct droopy nasal tip in selected cases.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Papanastasiou S, Logan A (2000) Management of the overprojecting nasal tip: a review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24(5):353–356

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Demir UL (2018) Comparison of tongue-in-groove and columellar strut on rotation and projection in droopy nasal tip: contribution of a cap graft. J Craniofac Surg 29:558–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tardy ME Jr (2004) Moderne rhinoplastik: prinzipien und philosophie. In: Behrbohm H, Tardy ME (eds) Funktionell-ästhetische Chirurgie der Nase. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 36–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Foda HM (2003) Management of the droopy tip: a comparison of three alarcartilage-modifying techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1408–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Toriumi DM (2006) New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8(3):156–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Spataro EA, Most SP (2018) Tongue-in-groove technique for rhinoplasty:technical refinements and considerations. Facial Plast Surg 34:529–538

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Atighechi S, Dadgarnia M, Vaziribozorg S, Baradaranfar M, Zand V, Meybodian M, Mandegari M, Shirkhoda S (2020) Changes in elastic properties of the nasal tip using columellar strut graft versus tongue-in-groove method over one year after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277(1):147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Delarestaghi MM, Jahandideh H, Sanaei A, Jan D (2020) “Modified tongue-in-groove”: a new tip-plasty technique and comparison of its effect on correction of the nasolabial angle with the columellar strut technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 58(5):602–607

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Goode RL (1984) A method of tip projection measurement. In: Powell N, Humphrey B (eds) Proportions of the aesthetic face. Thieme-Stratton Inc., New York, pp 15–39

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Behrbohm H, Tardy ME Jr (2004) The dual character of nasal surgery: the choice of access for septorhinoplasy. In: Behrbohm H, Tardy ME (eds) Functional and aesthetic surgery of the nose: septorhinoplasty. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 23–35

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rohrich RJ, Durand PD, Dayan E (2020) changing role of septal extension versus columellar grafts in modern rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(5):927–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kridel RW, Scott BA, Foda HM (1999) The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty: a 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1:246–258

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lohuis PJ, Datema FR (2015) Patient satisfaction in Caucasian and Mediterranean open rhinoplasty using the tongue-in-groove technique: prospective statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance following aesthetic rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 125:831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dobratz EJ, Tran V, Hilger PA (2010) Comparison of techniques used to support the nasal tip and their long-term effects on tip position. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12:172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shah A, Pfaff M, Kinsman G, Steinbacher DM (2015) Alar-columellar and lateral nostril changes following tongue-in-groove rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(2):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Antunes MB, Quatela VC (2018) Effects of the tongue-in-groove maneuver on nasal tip rotation. Aesth Surg J 38:1065–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pensler JM (2006) The septal strut for nasal projection following closed rhino-plasty. Aesthet Surg J 26(3):275–279

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Karaiskakis P, Bromba M, Dietz A, Sand M, Dacho A (2016) Reconstruction of nasal tip support in primary, open approach septorhinoplasty: a retrospective analysis between the tongue in groove technique and the columellar strut. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:2555–2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Erol O, Buyuklu F, Koycu A, Bas C, Erbek SS (2019) Evaluation of nasal tip support in septorhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 43(4):1021–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Doddi NM, Eccles R (2010) The role of anthropometric measurements in nasal surgery and research: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 35:277–283

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No financial support was received for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozan Gökler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koçak, İ., Gökler, O. A Novel Modification of Tongue in Groove Technique (Auto-Septal Projection Graft) in Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02184-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Rhinoplasty
  • Tip rotation
  • Tongue in groove
  • Septal extension graft
  • Tip projection
  • Nasolabial angle