Women with macromastia experienced constitutional and psychosocial symptoms which could be improved by vertical scar or Inverted-T scar reduction mammaplasty. The authors conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis in an attempt to declare the differences of the vertical scar versus the Inverted-T scar reduction technique by comparing the postoperative complications and aesthetic effects.
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for clinical studies were searched through June 30, 2019. Cumulative analysis was conducted using the Review Manager Version 5.3 software. The summary odds ratio (OR) was estimated using random effect models at 95% confidence intervals (CIs), statistical heterogeneity was tested using the Chi-square test and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).
Two randomized controlled trials (RCT) and nine observational comparative studies were included. The vertical scar method was significantly lower than the Inverted-T scar method in overall incidence of complications (OR: 2.06; 95%CI, 1.15 to 3.70; P: 0.002) and wound dehiscence (OR: 4.62; 95%CI, 2.33 to 9.16; P<0.00001). No significant differences in seroma, hematoma, nipple necrosis, fat necrosis and reoperation were noted.
Both two breast reduction techniques are equally safe, while the vertical scar approach resulted in a statistically lower rate of overall complications and wound dehiscence.
Level of Evidence III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Koltz PF, Sbitany H, Myers RP, Shaw RB, Patel N, Girotto JA (2011) Reduction mammaplasty in the adolescent female: the URMC experience. International journal of surgery (London, England). 9(3):229–232
Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Kneeland TS et al (2000) Measuring health state preferences in women with breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):280–288
Miller BJ, Morris SF, Sigurdson LL et al (2005) Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(4):1025–1031
O’Blenes CA, Delbridge CL, Miller BJ, Pantelis A, Morris SF (2006) Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(2):351–358
Collins ED, Kerrigan CL, Kim M et al (2002) The effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical interventions in relieving the symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(5):1556–1566
Saariniemi KM, Keranen UH, Salminen-Peltola PK, Kuokkanen HO (2008) Reduction mammaplasty is effective treatment according to two quality of life instruments A prospective randomised clinical trial. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery:JPRAS. 61(12):1472–1478
Kalliainen LK (2012) ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):785–789
Roje Z, Roje Ž, Milošević M, Varvodić J, Mance M (2012) Current trends in breast reduction. Collegium antropologicum. 36(2):657–668
Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59(1):64–67
Lee TJ, Eom JS (1999) Periareolar reduction mammaplasty utilizing the inferior dermal pedicle. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 23(5):331–336
Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L (2003) Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: patient satisfaction, revision rates and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(6):1573–1578
Çelebiler Ö, Sönmez A, Erdim M, Yaman M, Numanoǧlu A (2005) Patients’ and surgeons’ perspectives on the scar components after inferior pedicle breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(2):459–464
Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(3):764–770
Hall-Findlay EJ (1999) A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(3):748–759
Hammond DC, Loffredo M (2012) Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):829e–839e
Kreithen J, Caffee H, Rosenberg J et al (2005) A comparison of the lejour and wise pattern methods of breast reduction. Ann Plast Surg 54(3):236–242
Sprole AM, Adepoju I, Ascherman J, Gayle LB, Grant RT, Talmor M (2007) Horizontal or vertical? an evaluation of patient preferences for reduction mammaplasty scars. Aesthetic Surg J 27(3):257–262
Dex EA, Asplund O, Ardehali B, Eccles SJ (2008) A method to select patients for vertical scar or inverted-T pattern breast reduction. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS. 61(11):1294–1302
Sak MC, Akin S, Ersen B, Tunali O, Ismail A (2017) Management of Gigantomastia: Outcomes of Superomedial Pedicle with Vertical Scar or Wise Pattern Skin Excision. World journal of plastic surgery. 6(2):206–211
Ogunleye AA, Leroux O, Morrison N, Preminger AB (2017) Complications After Reduction Mammaplasty: A Comparison of Wise Pattern/Inferior Pedicle and Vertical Scar/Superomedial Pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 79(1):13–16
Menéndez-Cardo A, Guillen-Grima F, Hontanilla B (2017) Analysis of satisfaction after breast reduction comparing vertical scar versus inverted T-shaped technique using the Breast-Q questionnaire Is patient satisfaction influenced by the amount of tissue removed? Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. 51(6):414–419
Thoma A, Ignacy TA, Duku EK et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial comparing health-related quality of life in patients undergoing vertical scar versus inverted T-shaped reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):48e–60e
Bouwer LR, van der Biezen JJ, Spronk CA, van der Lei B (2012) Vertical scar versus the inverted-T scar reduction mammaplasty: a 10-year follow-up. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS. 65(10):1298–1304
Zoumaras J, Lawrence J (2008) Inverted-T versus vertical scar breast reduction: one surgeon’s 5-year experience with consecutive patients. Aesthetic Surg J 28(5):521–526
Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. www. cochrane-handbook.org. Published 2017. Accessed.
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/ Published 2017. Accessed.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 1(2):97–111
Fernandez S, Coady L, Cohen-Shohet R, Molas-Pierson J, Mast BA (2016) Comparative Outcomes and Quality Analysis of Inverted-T and Pure Vertical Scar Techniques in Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 76(Suppl 4):S328-331
Antony AK, Yegiyants SS, Danielson KK et al (2013) A matched cohort study of superomedial pedicle vertical scar breast reduction (100 breasts) and traditional inferior pedicle Wise-pattern reduction (100 breasts): an outcomes study over 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1068–1076
Hunter-Smith DJ, Smoll NR, Marne B, Maung H, Findlay MW (2012) Comparing breast-reduction techniques: time-to-event analysis and recommendations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(3):600–606
James A, Verheyden C (2011) A retrospective study comparing patient outcomes of wise pattern-inferior pedicle and vertical pattern-medial pedicle reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 67(5):481–483
Horch RE, Jaeger K, Stark GB (1999) Quality of life after breast reduction. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 31(2):137–142
Singh KA, Losken A (2012) Additional benefits of reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(3):562–570
Coriddi M, Nadeau M, Taghizadeh M, Taylor A (2013) Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):285–290
Greco R, Noone B (2017) Evidence-Based Medicine: Reduction Mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):230e–239e
Hall-Findlay EJ, Shestak KC (2015) Breast Reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(4):531e–544e
Agrawal A, Ayantunde AA, Cheung KL (2006) Concepts of seroma formation and prevention in breast cancer surgery. ANZ J Surg 76(12):1088–1095
Collis N, McGuiness CM, Batchelor AG (2005) Drainage in breast reduction surgery: a prospective randomised intra-patient trail. Br J Plast Surg 58(3):286–289
Adham M, Sawan K, Lovelace C, Jaeger NJ, Adham C (2011) Unfavorable outcomes with vertical reduction mammaplasty: part II. Aesthetic Surg J 31(1):40–46
Shestak KC, Davidson EH (2016) Assessing Risk and Avoiding Complications in Breast Reduction. Clin Plast Surg 43(2):323–331
Spear SL, Howard MA (2003) Evolution of the vertical reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(3):855–868
Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1632–1642
Neaman KC, Armstrong SD, Mendonca SJ et al (2012) Vertical reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle: is it really for everyone? Aesthetic Surg J 32(6):718–725
Waldman RA, Finch J, Grant-Kels JM, Whitaker-Worth D (2019) Skin diseases of the breast and nipple: Inflammatory and infectious diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 80(6):1483–1494
Roje Z, Roje Z, Milosević M, Varvodić J, Mance M (2012) Current trends in breast reduction. Collegium antropologicum. 36(2):657–668
Góes JC, Landecker A, Lyra EC, Henríquez LJ, Góes RS, Godoy PM (2004) The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: clinical and mammographic evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28(5):268–274
Ron O, Inbal A, Arad E et al (2018) Superomedial Pedicle Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Breast Symmetry and Aesthetics. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(3):639–647
Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(1):100–114
van Deventer PV, Graewe FR (2016) The Blood Supply of the Breast Revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(5):1388–1397
Mistry RM, MacLennan SE, Hall-Findlay EJ (2017) Principles of Breast Re-Reduction: A Reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(6):1313–1322
Roehl K, Craig ES, Gómez V, Phillips LG (2008) Breast reduction: safe in the morbidly obese? Plast Reconstr Surg 122(2):370–378
Eder M, Kloppel M, Muller D, Papadopulos NA, Machens HG, Kovacs L (2013) 3-D analysis of breast morphology changes after inverted T-scar and vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty over 12 months. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS. 66(6):776–786
This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0110500) and National Nature Science Foundation of China (No.81701922 and No.81873941).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human or Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study informed consent is not required.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Qian, B., Wang, Z. et al. Vertical Scar Versus Inverted-T Scar Reduction Mammaplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Aesth Plast Surg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02167-w
- Vertical scar
- Inverted-T scar
- Breast reduction