Skip to main content
Log in

Factors That May Affect Rating and Liking Scores of Septorhinoplasty Videos on YouTube

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the increasing use of videos on social media platforms such as YouTube that inform patients about conditions and procedures, it is an enigma how patients benefit from these videos. Although professional healthcare providers play an important role in this regard, there are no data on video characteristics that make a video useful, or likable by the audience. We aimed to investigate that factors make a septorhinoplasty video posted on YouTube successful.

Materials and Methods

Video demographics, including type, source, length, and viewers’ comments, were evaluated. Three researchers independently assessed videos on septorhinoplasty for attractiveness. Nine criteria, including preoperative nasal congestion, snoring, nasal deformity (visuality), surgical treatment, postoperative nasal congestion, bruising\swelling, pain, patient satisfaction, and medical treatment, were examined.

Results

The number of likes for the videos with preoperative nasal deformity data (visuality) was found to be significantly higher than that for the videos without preoperative nasal deformity (visuality) data. For the videos with surgical treatment data, the number of likes, the number of dislikes, the number of comments, and the total number of views were found to be significantly higher than those for the videos without surgical treatment data (p values 0.007, 0.016, 0.006, and 0.003 respectively). Videos with medical treatment data had a significantly higher number of comments than those without medical treatment data.

Conclusion

The attractiveness of a video on septorhinoplasty increases when it contain both medical and surgical treatment data.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery’s Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank: Statistics 2018 (2019) Aesthet Surg J 39:1–27

  2. Oremule B, Patel A, Orekoya O, Advani R, Bondin D (2019) Quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of patient information on rhinoplasty. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:282–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang AT, Sandhu NP, Wittich CM, Mandrekar JN, Beckman TJ (2012) Using social media to improve continuing medical education: a survey of course participants. Mayo Clin Proc 87:1162–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukewar S, Mani P, Wu X, Lopez R, Shen B (2013) YouTube and inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 7:392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorice SC, Li AY, Gilstrap J, Canales FL, Furnas HJ (2017) Social media and the plastic surgery patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:1047–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ward B, Ward M, Nicheporuck A, Alaeddin I, Paskhover B (2019) Assessment of YouTube as an informative resource on facial plastic surgery procedures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21:75–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta A, Nissan M, Rayess H, Zuliani GF, Carron M (2017) YouTube and rhinoplasty: an analysis of the videos available online. Am J Cosmet Surg 34(4):179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berat Demir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of article, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, B., Sahin, A., Mammadova, U. et al. Factors That May Affect Rating and Liking Scores of Septorhinoplasty Videos on YouTube. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 2253–2258 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01802-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01802-2

Keywords

Navigation