Skip to main content

Lactation History Affects Postoperative Fat Volume Retention Rate in Autologous Fat Grafting Breast Augmentation

Abstract

Background

Autologous fat grafting has been widely used in the field of plastic surgery, especially breast aesthetic augmentation. However, postoperative fat volume retention rate is still difficult to predict.

Objective

The authors conducted a retrospective study to compare the fat volume retention rate in patients with varying lactation histories.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed of patients who underwent autologous fat grafting breast augmentation in our center from 2012 to 2018. Individuals were separated into two groups according to their lactation history: Group A without a history of lactation and Group B with a history of lactation.

Results

A total of 70 cases (137 breasts) were included (Group A, n = 40; Group B, n = 30). Patients without lactation history were younger (Group A, 25.88 years; Group B, 36.03 years, p < 0.05) and had a significantly lower mean body mass index (Group A,19.72 kg/m2; Group B, 20.83 kg/m2, p = 0.010). The proportion of donor sites varied (Group A, abdomen 25%, thigh 70%; Group B, abdomen 53.33%, thigh 46.67%, p < 0.05). The percentage of tissue volume retained of patients with a history of lactation was significantly higher (Group A, 30.42%; Group B, 41.03%, p = 0.028).

Conclusion

Significant differences in postoperative volume retention rate in different patients based on lactation history were observed. The volume retention rate after breast augmentation with autologous fat is higher in patients with a history of lactation. The physiological process of lactation may influence the response to autologous fat grafting, but further studies of the mechanism are needed.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Zielins ER, Brett EA, Longaker MT et al (2016) Autologous fat grafting: the science behind the surgery. Aesthet Surg J 36(4):488–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo X, Mu D, Xing W et al (2018) Identification of the optimal recipient layer for transplanted fat: a prospective study on breast lipoaugmentation. Aesthet Surg J. Epub ahead of print

  3. Shim YH, Zhang RH (2017) Literature review to optimize the autologous fat transplantation procedure and recent technologies to improve graft viability and overall outcome: a systematic and retrospective analytic approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(4):815–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Del Vecchio DA (2012) “SIEF”–simultaneous implant exchange with fat: a new option in revision breast implant surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(6):1187–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen A, Pasyk KA, Bouvier TN et al (1990) Comparative study of survival of autologous adipose tissue taken and transplanted by different techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(3):378, 386–389

  6. Chajchir A, Benzaquen I, Wexler E et al (1990) Fat injection. Aesthet Plast Surg 14(2):127–136

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartynski J, Marion MS, Wang TD (1990) Histopathologic evaluation of adipose autografts in a rabbit ear model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 102(4):314–321

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoppe DL, Ueberreiter K, Surlemont Y, Peltoniemi H, Stabile M, Kauhanen S (2013) Breast reconstruction de novo by water-jet assisted autologous fat grafting—a retrospective study. Ger Med Sci 11:Doc17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Khouri RK, Rigotti G, Cardoso E, Khouri RK Jr, Biggs TM (2014) Megavolume autologous fat transfer: part I. Theory and principles. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):550–557

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung HK, Kim CH, Song SY (2016) Prospective 1-year follow-up study of breast augmentation by cell-assisted lipotransfer. Aesthet Surg J 36(2):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khouri RK, Eisenmann-Klein M, Cardoso E et al (2012) Brava and autologous fat transfer is a safe and effective breast augmentation alternative: results of a 6-year,81-patient, prospective multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):1173–1187

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Denadai R, Raposo-Amaral CA, Pinho AS et al (2017) Predictors of autologous free fat graft retention in the management of craniofacial contour deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(1):50e–61e

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiu CH (2014) Autologous fat grafting for breast augmentation in underweight women. Aesthet Surg J 34(7):1066–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnett JB, Woods MN, Lamon-Fava S (2004) Plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(2):776–782

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Napoli N, Vattikuti S, Yarramaneni J et al (2012) Increased 2-hydroxylation of estrogen is associated with lower body fat and increased lean body mass in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 72(1):66–71

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Han SI, Komatsu Y, Murayama A et al (2014) Estrogen receptor ligands ameliorate fatty liver through a nonclassical estrogen receptor/Liver X receptor pathway in mice. Hepatology 59(5):1791–1802

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu C, Luan J, Ji K et al (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(5):1134–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP (2007) Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:775–785

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Czerny V (1895) Plastischer ersatz der brustdruse durch ein lipoma. Chir Kong Verhandl 2:216

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peer LA (1955) Cell survival theory versus replacement theory. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 16(3):161–168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Report on autologous fat transplantation (1987) ASPRS Ad-Hoc Committee on new procedures, 1987. Plast Surg Nurs 7(4):140–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spear SL, Wilson HB, Lockwood MD (2005) Fat injection to correct contour deformities in the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(5):1300–1305

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP (2007) Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(3):775–785

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lancerotto L, Chin MS, Freniere B et al (2013) Mechanisms of action of external volume expansion devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):569–578

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mu D, Luan J, Guo X et al (2015) Brava assisted autologous fat transfer in breast augmentation. J Tissue Eng Reconstr Surg (2):78–79

  26. Wang Y, Sun JJ, Ji K et al (2015) Percentage volume maintenance in autologous fat graft breast augmentation. Chin J Med Aesthet Cosmet 21(3):139–141

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bost F, Aouadi M, Caron L et al (2005) The role of MAPKs in adipocyte differentiation and obesity. Biochimie 87(1):51–56

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Geissler PJ, Davis K, Roostaeian J et al (2014) Improving fat transfer viability: the role of aging, body mass index, and harvest site. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(2):227–232

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Niada S, Giannasi C, Ferreira LM et al (2016) 17 beta-estradiol differently affects osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow. Differentiation 92(5):291–297

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bill JD, Derderian C, Barker J et al (2015) The role of estrogen in the modulation of autologous fat graft outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):103e–113e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mok H, Feng J, Hu W et al (2018) Decreased serum estrogen improves fat graft retention by enhancing early macrophage infiltration and inducing adipocyte hypertrophy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 501(1):266–272

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schendel SA (2015) Enriched autologous facial fat grafts in aesthetic surgery: 3D volumetric results. Aesthet Surg J 35:913–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA (2004) In search of improved fat transfer viability: a quantitative analysis of the role of centrifugation and harvest site. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(1):391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ullmann Y, Shoshani O, Fodor A et al (2005) Searching for the favorable donor site for fat injection: in vivo study using the nude mice model. Dermatol Surg 31(10):1304–1307

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li FC, Chen B, Cheng L (2014) Breast augmentation with autologous fat injection: a report of 105 cases. Ann Plast Surg 73(Suppl 1):S37–S42

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Padoin AV, Braga-Silva J, Martins P et al (2008) Sources of processed lipoaspirate cells: influence of donor site on cell concentration. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(2):614–618

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients who were willing to participate in the study and to complete the 3D imaging examination.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dali Mu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K., Mu, D., Zhang, X. et al. Lactation History Affects Postoperative Fat Volume Retention Rate in Autologous Fat Grafting Breast Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 118–126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01683-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01683-5

Keywords

  • Autologous fat graft
  • Volume retention rate
  • Lactation
  • 3D imaging technology
  • Retrospective study