Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correction of High-Grade Pseudogynecomastia After Massive Weight Loss: Modified Inferior Dermoglandular Pedicled Transverse Scar Reduction

  • Original Article
  • Body Contouring
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Whereas body-contouring surgery after massive weight loss in women receives much attention, little attention has been devoted to accentuating the male physique. Male patients after massive weight loss often suffer from redundant skin and soft tissue in the anterior and lateral chest region, causing various deformities of pseudogynecomastia. The authors present their approach to high-grade pseudogynecomastia correction with preservation of the NAC on an inferior dermoglandular pedicle with transverse scar only closure and without any meaningful liposuction.

Materials and Methods

A description of comprehensive pseudogynecomastia correction with the aforementioned technique followed by review of 58 consecutive patients operated on in our clinic from January 2017 to June 2018. Epidemiological data such as age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), weight loss, and the medical history of each patient were collected. All patients were photo-documented preoperatively and postoperatively in a standard manner. During the operation, weight of resected tissue and operative time were noted.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were operated on in a single stage. In our series, one patient had unilateral partial necrosis on nipple–areola complex, and two patients had minimal to moderate amounts of hematoma which were followed up without intervention. We did not encounter any infection-related complications or skin redundancy in our patients. Out of 58 patients, 55 of all the patients were highly satisfied with the aesthetic results. Three patients were mildly satisfied with the results, but they stress that moderate scar widening was the reason for the displeasure, not the definition of the chest which was deemed as satisfactory like the rest.

Conclusion

Our technique obviates the need for skin resection in a second operation, allows immediate skin recontouring, and provides a viable nipple–areola complex at the desired location. The patient does not have to suffer prolonged stress while awaiting skin retraction and is protected from a second dose of anesthesia and hospitalization.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gusenoff J-A, Coon D, Rubin J-P (2008) Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction, and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1301–1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardenas-Camarena L et al (2017) Surgical masculinization of the breast: clinical classification and surgical procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohrich R-J, Ha R-Y, Kenkle J-M et al (2003) Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mladick R-A, Hunstad J-P, Pitman G-H et al (2006) Practice forum: malebody contouring. Aesthet Surg J 26:307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hodgson E-L, Fruhstorfer B-H, Malata C-M (2005) Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:646–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckenstein M-S, Windle B-H, Stroup R-T Jr (1996) Anatomical parameters for nipple position and areolar diameter in males. Ann Plast Surg 36:33–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shulman O, Badani E, Wolf Y et al (2001) Appropriate location of the nipple–areola complex in males. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:348–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP (2008) Pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss: detectability of technique, patient satisfaction and classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1301–1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ziegler Ulrich E et al (2018) Modified treatment algorithm for pseudogynecomastia after massive weight loss. Ann Plast Surg 81(3):290–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoff A, Velasco-Laguardia F-J, Richter D-F (2012) Central pedicled breast reduction technique in male patients after massive weight loss. Obes Surg 22(3):445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thiénot S, Bertheuil N, Carloni R et al (2017) Postero-inferior pedicle surgical technique for the treatment of grade III gynecomastia. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):531–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alp Ercan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The protocol of the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent

Informed consent has been taken from each patient to use photos for academic purposes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diyarbakirlioglu, M., Ercan, A. & Dogan, Y. Correction of High-Grade Pseudogynecomastia After Massive Weight Loss: Modified Inferior Dermoglandular Pedicled Transverse Scar Reduction. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 435–441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01477-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01477-4

Keywords

Navigation