Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 780–785 | Cite as

Dorsal Augmentation with Diced Conchal Cartilage Wrapped in Retroauricular Fascia

  • Gianluca CampiglioEmail author
  • Giorgio Rafanelli
  • Francesco Klinger
  • Fabio Caviggioli
  • Silvia Giannasi
  • Marco Klinger
Original Article Rhinoplasty
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Dorsal augmentation is of primary importance to shape an ideal nose. Although costal cartilage is still used for this purpose, diced cartilage grafts wrapped in autogenous fascia became more and more popular in recent decades. In this paper, the authors report their experience with a new combination made by diced conchal cartilage wrapped in retroauricular fascia in primary and secondary cases.

Methods

The clinical records of the first 19 patients to undergo dorsal augmentation with this technique were reviewed. The entire concha has been harvested and, once diced, wrapped in a sleeve of retroauricular fascia obtained using the same incision. Quilting reabsorbable sutures closed the mastoid dead space and prevented the risk of hematoma. The graft has been used in all the cases through a closed approach.

Conclusion

The use of diced cartilage is nowadays considered one of the best options among the available procedures for dorsal augmentation. Diced conchal cartilage wrapped in posterior auricular fascial graft is a new, simple and safe procedure that eliminates the necessity of a secondary donor site (temple or thorax), speeds up the operation and leaves a well-concealed scar behind the ear. Its main disadvantages toward costal diced cartilage wrapped in rectus abdominis fascia are the minor quantity of cartilage that can be obtained, even in case of bilateral harvest, and compared to temporal fascia a longer postoperative swelling (6–8 weeks).

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Diced cartilage Retroauricular fascia Dorsal augmentation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Peer L (1943) Diced cartilage grafts. Arch Otolaryngol 38:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Erol O (2000) The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2229–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniel R, Calvert J (2004) Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2156–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yilmaz S, Ercocen A, Can Z, Yenidünya S, Edali N, Yormuk E (2001) Viability of diced, crushed cartilage grafts and the effects of surgicel (oxidized regenerated cellulose) on cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1054–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brenner K, McConnell M, Evans GR, Calvert J (2006) Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvert J, Brenner K, Da Costa M, Evans G (2006) Daniel R histological analysis of human diced cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:230–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cerkes N, Basaran K (2015) Diced cartilage grafts wrapped in rectus abdominis fascia for nasal dorsum augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang Y, Zhuang Z, Jiang H, Yang Q, Zhao Y, Han J, Yu D, Zhang Z (2008) The anatomy and application of the postauricular fascia flap in auricular reconstruction for congenital microtia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:S70–S76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horlock N, Misra A, Gault D (2001) The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(6):1487–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shokrollahi K, Cooper MA, Hiew LY (2009) A new strategy for otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(6):774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antohi N, Isac C, Stan V, Ionescu R (2012) Dorsal nasal augmentation with “open sandwich” graft consisting of conchal cartilage and retroauricular fascia. Aesthet Surg J 32:833–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodgkinson D, Valente P (2017) The versatile posterior auricular fascia in secondary rhinoplasty procedures. Aesth Plast Surg 41:893–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plastic Surgery Department and Post-Graduate School in Plastic SurgeryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations