Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 1360–1363 | Cite as

Commentary on Myomodulation with Injectable Fillers: An Innovative Approach to Addressing Facial Muscle Movement

  • Michael A. C. Kane
Editor’s Invited Commentary
  • 47 Downloads

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Myomodulation with Injectable Fillers: An Innovative Approach to Addressing Facial Muscle Movement is an interesting article about the potential muscle modulation that occurs when fillers are injected next to the mimetic muscles of the face. This is an interesting concept. It is also a concept I believe in wholeheartedly. I have no doubt in my mind that fillers placed strategically in the soft tissues of the face affect muscle movement. However, it is an extremely difficult concept to prove and this paper does little to prove it.

In a nutshell, this paper claims that the mimetic muscles of the face have an ideal resting length at which the muscle is most effective. There are references given and this concept seems to make...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Allergan, Galderma, Merz, Teoxane, Revance, Alphaeon, Muskuloskeletal Tissue Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Kane MAC (1999) Nonsurgical treatment of platysmal bands with injection of botulinum toxin A. Plastic Reconstr Surg 103:656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lambros V (2008) Models of facial aging and implications for treatment. Clin Plast Surg 35(3):319–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2008.02.012 (discussion 317) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lambros V (2007) Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(5):1367–1376 (discussion 1377) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lambros V (2014) Commentary on: the role of gravity in periorbital and midfacial aging. Aesthet Surg J 34(6):823–824.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x14537467 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pessa JE, Brown F (1992) Independent effect of various facial mimetic muscles on the nasolabial fold. Aesthet Plast Surg 16(2):167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kane MAC (2005) The functional anatomy of the lower face as it applies to rejuvenation via chemodenervation. Fac Plast Surg 21:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kane MA, Blitzer A, Brandt FS, Glogau RG, Monheit GD, Narins RS, Paty JA, Waugh JM (2012) Development and validation of a new clinically-meaningful rating scale for measuring lateral canthal line severity. Aesthet Surg J 32(3):275–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations