Skip to main content
Log in

Google Trends as a Resource for Informing Plastic Surgery Marketing Decisions

  • Original Article
  • Special Topics
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Celebrities have long influenced the medical decisions of the general population. By analyzing Google search data using Google Trends, we measured the impact of highly publicized plastic surgery-related events on the interest level of the general population in specific search terms. Additionally, we investigated seasonal and geographic trends around interest in rhinoplasties, which is information that physicians and small surgical centers can use to optimize marketing decisions.

Methods

Google Trends was used to access search data histories for three separate areas of interest: Kylie Jenner and lip fillers, Joan Rivers and plastic surgery, and rhinoplasty, which were then analyzed using two-tailed, two-sample equal variance t-tests.

Results

The average interest level in fillers increased by 30.31 points after Kylie Jenner announced that she received Juvéderm lip injections. The interest level in plastic surgery was decreased by 21.3% the month after Joan Rivers’ death. Between January 2004 and May 2017, the average interest level for rhinoplasty was significantly different in January/December (67.91 ± 20.68) and June/July (70.12 ± 18.89) from the remaining calendar months (63.58 ± 19.67). Los Angeles, New York City, and Miami showed consistently high interest levels throughout the time period, while Tulsa, OK, showed a major interest increase between 2015 to 2016 of 65 points.

Conclusions

A noticeable impact was observed in both celebrity cases on search term volume, and a seasonal effect is apparent for rhinoplasty searches. As many surgeons already employ aggressive Internet marketing strategies, understanding and utilizing these trends could help optimize their investments, increase social engagement, and increase practice awareness by potential patients.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nattinger B, Hoffmann RG (1998) Effect of Nancy Reagan’s mastectomy on choice of surgery for breast cancer by US women. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.10.762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cram P, Fendrick AM, Inadomi J, Cowen ME, Carpenter D, Vijan S (2003) The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.13.1601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grabe S, Ward LM, Hyde JS (2008) The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychol Bull. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Groesz L, Levine MP, Murnen SK (2001) The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: a meta-analytic review. Int J Eat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10005

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levine MP, Murnen SK (2009) Everybody knows that mass media are/are not [pick one] a cause of eating disorders: a critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. J Soc Clin Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sc Want (2009) Meta-analytic moderators of experimental exposure to media portrayals of women on female appearance satisfaction: social comparisons as automatic processes. Body Im. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.07.008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown Z, Tiggemann M (2016) Attractive celebrity and peer images on Instagram: effect on women’s mood and body image. Body Im. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.08.007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Heden P, Otte M (2015) The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aest Plast Surg 39:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghose A, Todri-Adamopoulos V (2016) Toward a digital attribution model: measuring the impact of display advertising on online consumer behavior. MIS Q 40:889–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Paskhover.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, B., Ward, M. & Paskhover, B. Google Trends as a Resource for Informing Plastic Surgery Marketing Decisions. Aesth Plast Surg 42, 598–602 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1019-4

Keywords

Navigation