Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Satisfaction and Its Influencing Factors of Microtia Reconstruction Using Autologous Cartilage

  • Original Article
  • Face and Neck Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate patient perceptions of and satisfaction with surgical outcomes of microtia reconstruction using autologous cartilage. It also analyzes associations between patient background characteristics and their evaluation.

Methods

Lobule-type microtia patients who had received first-stage surgery were interviewed using a questionnaire, which included assessment of nine auricle substructures, superior and inferior parts and overall impression. Answers were recorded on a five-point Likert-style scale. Satisfaction rate and average scores were used to compare satisfaction with different substructures. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to analyze the impact of background characteristics such as gender, age, side and body mass index (BMI) on satisfaction, measured as the total scores for different parts.

Results

The highest level of satisfaction was seen for the helix and the lowest for the tragus. The average score for the helix was significantly higher than for the concha (p < 0.05), tragus (p < 0.05), anti-tragus (p < 0.05), incisura (p < 0.05) and lobe (p < 0.05). The overall satisfaction was significantly correlated with work on the inferior part (ρ = 0.63, p < 0.05). Satisfaction from children under 12 years old was significantly higher than from children above 12 years old for superior structures and overall evaluation (p < 0.05). Left-sided microtia patients showed significantly higher satisfaction for inferior structures and overall evaluation than right-sided patients (p < 0.05). Overweight and obese patients were less satisfied with the tragus–incisura–anti-tragus complex compared with the rest (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Microtia patients were most satisfied with the helix and least satisfied with the tragus. Overall patient satisfaction was more dependent on inferior structures; the characteristics of younger age (<12 years), proper BMI (under overweight or obese) and left-sided microtia were linked with higher ratings.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deng K, Dai L, Yi L et al (2016) Epidemiologic characteristics and time trend in the prevalence of anotia and microtia in China. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 106:88–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li D, Chin W, Wu J et al (2010) Psychosocial outcomes among microtia patients of different ages and genders before ear reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:570–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Han SE, Lim SY, Pyon JK et al (2015) Aesthetic auricular reconstruction with autologous rib cartilage grafts in adult microtia patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:1085–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steffen A, Klaiber S, Katzbach R et al (2008) The psychosocial consequences of reconstruction of severe ear defects or third-degree microtia with rib cartilage. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soukup B, Mashhadi SA, Bulstrode NW (2012) Health-related quality-of-life assessment and surgical outcomes for auricular reconstruction using autologous costal cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:632–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steffen A, Wollenberg B, Konig IR et al (2010) A prospective evaluation of psychosocial outcomes following ear reconstruction with rib cartilage in microtia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1466–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clapham PJ, Pushman AG, Chung KC (2010) A systematic review of applying patient satisfaction outcomes in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1826–1833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Honigman RJ, Phillips KA, Castle DJ (2004) A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1229–1237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brent B (1992) Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:355–374 (discussion 375–356)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Q, Zhang R, Xu F et al (2009) Auricular reconstruction for microtia: personal 6-year experience based on 350 microtia ear reconstructions in China. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:849–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chin W, Zhang R, Zhang Q, XuZ Li D, Wu J (2009) Modifications of three-dimensional costal cartilage framework grafting in auricular reconstruction for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1940–1946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagata S (1994) Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle:part1. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for lobule-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Zhang R, Zhang Q et al (2016) An alternative posterosuperior auricular fascia flap for ear elevation during microtia reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(1):47–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tai Y, Tanaka S, Fukushima J, Kizuka Y, Kiyokawa K, Inoue Y, Yamauchi T (2006) Refinements in the elevation of reconstructed auricles in microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2414–2423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL et al (2004) The patient outcomes of surgery-hand/arm (POS-Hand/Arm): a new patient-based outcome measure. J Hand Surg Eur 29:477–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen C, Lu FC (2004) The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci 17(Suppl):1–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Group of China Obesity Task Force (2004) Body mass index reference norm for screening overweight and obesity in Chinese children and adolescents. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi 25(2):97–102

    Google Scholar 

  18. Horlock N, Vogelin E, Bradbury ET et al (2005) Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients. Ann Plast Surg 54:517–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneuer FJ, Bentley JP, Holland AJ, Lain SJ, Jamieson SE, Badawi N, Nassar N (2017) Early childhood development of boys with genital anomalies. Birth Defects Res. doi:10.1002/bdra.23603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johns AL (2016) Timing pediatric ear reconstruction: the case for a range of options. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:567–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johns AL, Lucash RE, Im DD, Lewin SL (2015) Pre and post-operative psychological functioning in younger and older children with microtia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(4):492–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rutter M, Rutter M (1992) Developing minds: challenge and continuity across the life span. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harris DL (1982) The symptomatology of abnormal appearance: an anecdotal survey. Br J Plast Surg 35(3):312–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sunwoo WS, Choi HG, Kim DW et al (2014) Characteristics of rib cartilage calcification in Asian patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 16:102–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mora Huertas AC, Schmelzer CE, Hoehenwarter W et al (2016) Molecular-level insights into aging processes of skin elastin. Biochimie 128–129:163–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Welborn TA, Knuiman MW, Vu HT (2000) Body mass index and alternative indices of obesity in relation to height, triceps skinfold and subsequent mortality: the Busselton health study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24(1):108–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ludescher B, Rommel M, Willmer T, Fritsche A, Schick F, Machann J (2011) Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in adults: correlation with BMI and recommendations for pen needle lengths for subcutaneous self-injection. Clin Endocrinol 75(6):786–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdulrazzaq YM, Nagelkerke N, Moussa MA (2011) UAE population reference standard charts for body mass index and skinfold thickness, at ages 0-18 years. Int J Food Sci Nutr 62(7):692–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Holliday RM, Gupta V, Vibhute PG (2016) Body mass index: a reliable predictor of subcutaneous fat thickness and needle length for ventral gluteal intramuscular injections. Am J Ther. doi:10.1097/mjt.0000000000000474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ezure T, Amano S (2010) Influence of subcutaneous adipose tissue mass on dermal elasticity and sagging severity in lower cheek. Skin Res Technol 16(3):332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Blackburn K, Schirillo J (2012) Emotive hemispheric differences measured in real-life portraits using pupil diameter and subjective aesthetic preferences. Exp Brain Res 219:447–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schirillo JA (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries and gender influence Rembrandt’s portrait orientations. Neuropsychologia 38:1593–1606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Tongtong Liang, Ziqing Ma, Menghao Zhang for contributing to the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruhong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 1983.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, C., Hoon, S.Y., Zhang, R. et al. Patient Satisfaction and Its Influencing Factors of Microtia Reconstruction Using Autologous Cartilage. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 1106–1114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0907-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0907-y

Keywords

Navigation