Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Objective Assessment of Facial Rejuvenation After Massive Weight Loss

  • Original Article
  • Non-Surgical Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

While the literature is replete with articles about body contouring after bariatric surgery, little information exists regarding the outcomes of facelift following massive weight loss (MWL). A case report and a technique article are the only sources available addressing this issue. This pilot study objectively examines the effects of MWL in the cervicofacial region and results after facelift.

Methods

A retrospective review of seven patients who underwent facelift after MWL (>100 pounds) was performed. Patient’s change in appearance was objectively evaluated using an apparent age model. Forty blinded reviewers assessed pre- and postoperative photographs of seven MWL and eleven non-MWL female patients. The reviewers estimated the apparent age for each subject. Reduction in apparent age was calculated by comparing patient’s apparent age against actual age.

Results

The preoperative apparent age of MWL patients was 5.1 years older than their actual age (p < 0.02) compared to the increased preoperative apparent age of 1.2 years in non-MWL subjects (p > 0.05); suggesting MWL patients appear older than their actual age. Post-operatively, the apparent age reduction in MWL patients was 6.0 years; and their apparent age after surgery was 0.9 year less than their actual age (p > 0.05). In contrast, the control group exhibited an apparent age reduction of 5.4 years and a postoperative apparent age 4.2 years younger than their actual age (p < 0.01). Apparent age reduction was not significantly different for the two groups (p > 0.05). Age, BMI, and follow-up were similar between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

MWL may accelerate apparent cervicofacial aging. Facelift following MWL enhances cervicofacial appearance and significantly reduces apparent age. We hope this study stimulates further interest in the study of facial esthetics in this increasing population.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trus TL, Pope GD, Finlayson SR (2005) National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 19(5):616–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg PH, Henderson KE, Grilo CM (2006) Psychiatric disorder comorbidity and association with eating disorders in bariatric surgery patients: a cross-sectional study using structured interview-based diagnosis. J Clin Psychiatry 67(7):1080–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD et al (2007) Psychiatric disorders among bariatric surgery candidates: relationship to obesity and functional health status. Am J Psychiatry 164(2):328–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poyatos JV, Balibrea JM, Sales BO et al (2014) Post-bariatric surgery body contouring treatment in the public health system: cost study and perception by patients. Plast Recon Surg 134(3):448–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor J, Shermak M (2004) Body contouring following massive weight loss. Obes Surg 14:1080–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Cosmetic surgery trends. 2000, 2009, 2010. Online. http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2010-statisticss/Overall-Trends/2010-cosmetic-plastic-surgery-minimally-invasive-statistics.pdf

  7. Kitzinger HB, Abayev S, Pittermann A et al (2012) After massive weight loss: patients’ expectations of body contouring surgery. Obes Surg 22:544–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery statistics: top procedures of 2013. Online. http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2013-statistics/body-contouring-massive-weight-loss-stats.pdf

  9. Sclafani AP (2005) Restoration of the jawline and neck after bariatric surgery. Facial Plast Surg 21(1):28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Narasimhan K, Ramanadham S, Rohrich RJ (2015) Facelifting in the massive weight loss patient: modifications of our technique for this population. Plast Recon Surg 135(2):397–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marten E, Langevin CJ, Kaswan S et al (2011) The safety of rhytidectomy in the elderly. Plast Recons Surg. 127(6):2455–2463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swanson E (2011) Objective assessment of change in apparent age after facial rejuvenation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(9):1124–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozturck CE, Huettner F, Ozturck et al (2013) Outcomes assesment of combination face lift and perioral phenol-croton oil peel. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):743e–758e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aly AS, Cram AE, Heddens C (2004) Truncal body contouring surgery in the massive weight loss patient. Clin Plast Surg 31:611–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aly AS, Zahrani Al-, Cram AE (2013) Lower bodylifts. In: Neligan PC, Warren R (eds) Plastic surgery: volume two: aesthetic, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 568–598

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin JP, Nguyen V, Schwentker A (2006) Perioperative management of the post-gastric bypass patient presenting for body contouring surgery. Clin Plast Surg 31:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Staalsen T, Olsen MF, Elander A (2012) Complications of abdominoplasty after weight loss as a result of bariatric surgery or dieting/post pregnancy. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 46(6):416–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stuzin JM (2006) Restoring facial shape in face lifting: the role of skeletal support in facial analysis and midface soft-tissue repositioning (Baker Gordon symposium cosmetic series). Plast Reconstr Surg 191:362–377

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rawlani V, Mustoe TA (2012) The staged face lift: addressing the biomechanical limitations of the primary rhytidectomy. Plast Recon Surg. 130(6):1305–1314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burke JP (1974) Should the subcutaneous tissue be plicated in a face lift? Plast Recosntr Surg. 54(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rees TD, Aston SJ (1977) A clinical evaluation of the results of submusculo-aponeurotic dissection and fixation in face lifts. Plast Recosntr Surg 59(12):851–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith RC, Karolow WW, Papsidero MJ et al (1982) Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in face lifting. Laryngoscope 92:901–911

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prado A, Andrades P, Danilla S et al (2006) A clinical restrospective study comparing two short-scar face lifts: minimal access cranial suspension versus lateral SMASectomy. Plast Recosntr Surg 117(5):1413–1425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Antell DE, Orseck MJ (2007) A comparison of face lifts techniques in eight consecutive sets of identical twins. Plastic Reconstr Surg 120(6):1667–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE (2007) The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Recon Surg 119(7):2219–2227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlin GA, Gurdin MM (1978) Ancillary procedures for the aging face and neck. Surg Clin North Am 51:371

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rafaty FM, Cochran J (1978) A technique of nasolabioplasty. Laryngoscope 51(2):371–385

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rees TD (1980) Aesthetic plastic surgery, vol 2. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 703

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guyuron B, Michelow B (1994) The nasolabial fold: a challenge, a solution. Plast Reconstr Surg 93(3):522–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guyuron B (1995) The armamentarium to the recalcitrant nasolabial fold. Clin Plast Surg 22:253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudkin G, Miller TA (1999) Aging nasolabial fold and treatment by direct excision. Plast Recon Surg 104(5):1502–1505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sen C, Cek DI, Reis M (2004) Direct skin excision fat reshaping and repositioning for correction of prominent nasolabial fold. Aesthet Plast Surg 28(5):307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Talmor M, Hoffman LA, LaTrenta GS (2002) Facial atrophy in HIV-related fat redistribution syndrome: anatomic Evaluation and Surgical Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 49(1):11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boix V (2003) Polyactic acid implants. A new smile for lipoatrophic faces? AIDS 17:2533–2535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abood A, Ong J, Withey S et al (2006) Facial atrophy in HIV-related fat redistribution syndrome: a plastic surgical perspective on treatment options and a look to the future. Int J STD AIDS 17:217–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mori A, Lo Russo G, Agostini T, Pattarino J, Vichi F, Dini M (2006) Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-associated facial lipoatrophy with lipofilling and submalar silicone implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(11):1209–1216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zins JE, Morrison CM, Langevin CJ (2013) Neck rejuvenation. In: Neligan PC, Warren R (eds) Plastic surgery: volume two: aesthetic surgery, 3rd edn. Elsevier, London, pp 313–326

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zins JE, Moreira-Gonzalez A (2006) Advances in facial aesthetic surgery: new approaches to old problems and current approaches to new problems. In: Siemionow A (ed) Tissue surgery, vol 1. Springer, London, UK, pp 101–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Pitanguy I, Pamplona D, Weber HI, Leta F, Salgado F, Radwanski HN (1998) Numerical modeling of facial aging. Plast Recon Surg 102(1):200–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Zins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Couto, R.A., Waltzman, J.T., Tadisina, K.K. et al. Objective Assessment of Facial Rejuvenation After Massive Weight Loss. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 847–855 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0540-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0540-6

Keywords

Navigation