Abstract
Objective
Reconstruction of large, deep medial canthal defects presents a challenge to reconstructive surgeons, since both safe oncologic excision and aesthetically pleasant results should be met. We report our 5-year experience with the use of a double flap technique, which looks like a “pickaxe”, in reconstruction of the aforementioned kind of defects.
Methods
The technique is based on the simultaneous use a glabellar and a nasolabial flap designed and raised on either side of the medial canthal defect. The complex of the defect with the flaps looks like a pickaxe. The technique was applied in 17 patients during the last 5 years.
Results
No tumour relapses were recorded in our series (mean follow-up period of 24.8 months). Also neither disfiguring scar contractures nor trapdoor deformities were noticed because of the ample tissue provided and the w-plasty outline of the resulting surgical scar. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcome.
Conclusion
The suggested technique is simple, reliable and provides very good aesthetic results without disfiguring deformities. Most importantly, consistent long-term results with high patient satisfaction and no tumour relapses were achieved.
Level of Evidence V
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Spinelli HM, Jelks GW (1993) Periocular reconstruction: a systemic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:1017–1024
Ng SGJ, Inkster CF, Leatherbarrow B (2001) The rhomboid flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 85:556–559
Harris GJ, Logani SC (1998) Multiple aesthetic unit flaps for medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14:352–359
Boriani F, Marconi F (2007) Basal cell carcinomas of the inner canthus: incidence of incomplete excision according to topographical localization of tumours. Br J Dermatol 157:1301–1302
Zhang Y, Wu HL, Lu YM (2012) Contralateral nasolabial flap for reconstruction of midface defects. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:1175–1178
Yildirim S, Aköz T, Akan M, Cakir B (2001) The use of combined nasolabial V-Y advancement and glabellar flaps for large medial canthal defects. Dermatol Surg 27:215–218
Karşidağ S, Sacak B, Bayraktaroglu S, Ozcan A, Ugurlu K, Bas L (2008) A novel approach for the reconstruction of medial canthal and nasal dorsal defects: frontal hairline island flap. J Craniofac Surg 19:1653–1657
Mombaerts I, Gillis A (2010) The tunneled forehead flap in medial canthal and eyelid reconstruction. Dermatol Surg 36:1118–1125
Chiarelli A, Forcignano R, Boatto D, Zuliani F, Bisazza S (2001) Reconstruction of the inner canthus region with a forehead muscle flap: a report on three cases. Br J Plast Surg 54:248–252
Motomura H, Taniguchi T, Harada T, Muraoka M (2006) A combined flap reconstruction for full-thickness defects of the medial canthal region. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:747–751
Jelks GW, Glat PM, Jelks EB, Longaker MT (2002) Medial canthal reconstruction using a medially based upper eyelid myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1636–1643
Chao Y, Xin X, Jiangping C (2010) Medial canthal reconstruction with combined glabellar and orbicularis oculi myocutaneous advancement flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1624–1628
Berry MG, Fernandes AE (2008) Triple-flap medial canthal reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg 16:170–172
Ayhan S, Ozmen S, Sarigüney Y, Latifoğlu O, Atabay K (2001) Reconstruction of the medial canthal region with the “triple-flap” technique. Ann Plast Surg 47:354–355
Conflict of interest
The authors have no commercial associations or financial interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lykoudis, E.G., Lykoudis, G.E. & Alexiou, G.A. “Pickaxe” Double Flap: A Useful “Tool” for Reconstruction of Deep Large Medial Canthal Defects—5-Year Experience and Brief Literature Review. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 410–413 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0462-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0462-3