Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tongue-in-Groove Setback of the Medial Crura to Control Nasal Tip Deprojection in Open Rhinoplasty

  • Innovative Techniques
  • Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Overprojection of the nasal tip is a common problem in aesthetic Caucasian and Mediterranean rhinoplasty patients. In these patients, shortening of the conjoined medial crura frequently plays an important part in deprojection of the nasal tip. The combination of vertical incision maneuvers of the medial crura and tongue-in-groove (TIG) allows the surgeon to achieve significant control over projection, rotation and shape of the nasal tip. In this article we present our graduated approach towards nasal tip deprojection in aesthetic Caucasian and Mediterranean rhinoplasty together with a statistical analysis of overall success.

Methods

This retrospective study based on 22 consecutive Caucasian or Mediterranean patients who had aesthetic, open deprojection rhinoplasty combining TIG with either footplate resection or medial crural overlay by one surgeon between 2009 and 2011. Aesthetical success was determined by statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance, scored on five aesthetic 5-point Likert Scale questions and a 10 cm visual analog scale. Change in projection was calculated using a modified Goode method, applied on standardized pre- and postoperative photographs which were also used to measure change in rotation.

Results

Subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance improved from 15.14 to 6.55 (p < 0.01). The mean aesthetic VAS score improved from 3.32 to 7.91 (p < 0.01). Substantial deprojection was measured in 19 patients (86.4 %) with a mean deprojection ratio of 0.06 [range 0.02–0.16]. An increased projection ratio of 0.03 was encountered in one patient and in two patients projection was unchanged.

Conclusions

Analysis of objective and subjective aesthetic outcome data suggest that our deprojection algorithm helps to deliver consistently good results in Caucasian and Mediterranean patients who require open deprojection rhinoplasty.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lohuis PJ, Faraj-Hakim S, Knobbe A, Duijvesteijn W, Bran GM (2012) Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 14:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kridel RW, Scott BA, Foda HM (1999) The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1:246–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lohuis PJ, Datema FR. Tongue-in-Groove technique in Caucasian and Mediterranean open rhinoplasty [awaiting decision Laryngoscope]

  4. Lohuis PJ, Hakim S, Knobbe A, Duivesteijn W, Tasman AJ (2013) Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:913–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soliemanzadeh P, Kridel RW (2005) Nasal tip overprojection: algorithm of surgical deprojection techniques and introduction of medial crural overlay. Arch Facial Past Surg 7:374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foda HM (2001) Alar setback tecnique: a controlled method of nasal tip deprojection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:1341–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson JR (1984) A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 110:349–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Janeke JB, Wright WK (1971) Studies on the support of the nasal tip. Arch Otolaryngol 93:458–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gubish W, Eichhorn-Sens J (2008) The sliding technique: a method to treat the overprojected nasal tip. Aesth Plast Surg 32:772–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dm Toriumi (2006) New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial plast Surg 8:156–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crumley RL, Lanser M (1988) Quantative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 98:202–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner F, Zanaret M, Giovanni A (2007) Evaluation of nasal tip projection. Fr ORL 92:282–287

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tasman AJ, Lohuis PJ (2012) Control of tip rotation. Facial Plast Surg 28:243–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank R. Datema.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Datema, F.R., Lohuis, P.J.F.M. Tongue-in-Groove Setback of the Medial Crura to Control Nasal Tip Deprojection in Open Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 39, 53–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0429-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0429-9

Keywords

Navigation