Skip to main content
Log in

Informed Consent in Italy—Traditional Versus the Law: A Gordian Knot

  • Original Article
  • Experimental/Special Topics
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Italian law no. 86 of 5 June 2012, which establishes a set of rules on the matter of breast implants, came into effect in July 2012. The law is at the center of a widespread and animated cultural debate that in recent years has been taking place in Italy.

Discussion

The fundamental prohibition imposed by the law concerns the age limit. Breast implants for exclusively aesthetic purposes are allowed only if the legal age (18 years) has been reached. This prohibition does not apply in cases of severe congenital malformations certified by a physician operating within the National Health Service or by a public health care institution. The legal imposition of an age limit raises a number of perplexities: one at a bioethical level and one that is strictly juridical. In fact, it is impossible to deal with this issue unless the wider debate concerning the self-determination and autonomy of underage patients in biomedical matters is considered. It appears, then, that the issue is again exclusively related to the peculiarity of cosmetic surgery, which when aimed at correcting “only” the pathologic experiences of self-image, does not acquire the dignity of therapy. If, however, the improvement of self-image serves to achieve a better psycho-emotional balance and favors the development of social relations undermined by evident physical defects, age restrictions can be disregarded.

Summary

The authors believe the real risk is that the law imposed by the Italian state is based on assumptions and preformed value judgments. Furthermore, in the understanding of needs, legislation often is biased toward objective biophysical problems without attaching due importance to subjective psychological and social problems. While acknowledging the seriousness of the issue, the authors do not agree with the legislature’s rigidity. However, plastic surgeons must form a plan for addressing the concerns about breast implants and evaluating whether they are appropriate for adolescents, taking into account the unique psychological and developmental considerations of adolescent cosmetic surgery patients.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons: Policy Statement: Breast Augmentation in Teenagers. Retrieved xxxx at http://www.plasticsurgery.org/medical_professionals/health_policy/loader.cfm?url_/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID_21757, 2004

  2. Atiyeh BS, Rubeiz MT, Hayek SN (2008) Aesthetic/cosmetic surgery and ethical challenges. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:829–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Botti G, Cella A (2002) Breast augmentation as an incentive in recovering from anorexia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung KC, Pushman AG, Bellfi LT (2009) A systematic review of ethical principles in the plastic surgery literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1711–1718

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Roubaix JA (2011) Beneficence, nonmaleficence, distributive justice, and respect for patient autonomy: reconcilable ends in aesthetic surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:11–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fineschi V, Neri M, Turillazzi E (2005) The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004). J Med Ethics 31:536–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasques JAL, Pereira de Godoy JM, Navarro Cruz EMT (2008) Psychosocial effects of otoplasty in children with prominent ears. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:910–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Italian National Committee of Bioethics, Information and Consent to Medical Treatment, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Rome, Italy, published 20 June 1992

  9. Italian National Committee of Bioethics, Bioethics with Childhood, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Rome, Italy, published 22 January 1994

  10. Italian National Committee of Bioethics, Bioethical Aspects of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Rome, Italy, published 5 July 2012

  11. Italian Society of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery. Retrieved xxxx at http://www.sicpre.it/

  12. Khunger N (2013) Guest editorial: challenging issues in aesthetic surgery. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 79:30–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Larson K, Gosain AK (2012) Cosmetic surgery in the adolescent patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:135e–141e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchesi A, Marchesi M, Fasulo FC, Morini O, Vaienti L (2012) Mammoplasties and medicolegal issues: 50 Cases of litigation in aesthetic surgery of the breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:122–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGrath MH, Schooler WG (2004) Elective plastic surgical procedures in adolescence. Adolesc Med Clin 15:487–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendelson BC (2008) Aesthetic/cosmetic surgery and ethical challenges. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:840–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. Retrieved xxxx at http://www.who.int/

  18. Sterodimas A, Radwanski HN, Pitanguy I (2011) Ethical issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:262–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trussler AP, Tabbal GN (2012) Patient safety in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:470e–478e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turillazzi E, Fineschi V (2011) Advance directives in therapeutic intervention: a review of the Italian bioethical and juridical debate. Med Sci Law 51:76–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson R (2003) EU parliament calls for tougher rules on breast implants. BMJ 22:414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zuckerman DM, Abraham A (2008) Teenagers and cosmetic surgery: focus on breast augmentation and liposuction. J Adolesc Health 43:318–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zuckerman DM (2010) Reasonably safe? Breast implants and informed consent. Reprod Health Matters 18:94–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vittorio Fineschi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turillazzi, E., Neri, M., Riezzo, I. et al. Informed Consent in Italy—Traditional Versus the Law: A Gordian Knot. Aesth Plast Surg 38, 759–764 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0337-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0337-z

Keywords

Navigation