Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Axillary Endoscopic Subglandular Tunneling Approach for Types 2 and 3 Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation

  • Original Article
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dual-plane techniques offer excellent pocket locations for breast augmentation. Traditional techniques require incisions in the inframammary or periareolar crease, which are rarely accepted in the authors’ department because of visible scars on the breast. Therefore, the authors developed a transaxillary approach for dual-plane procedures using an endoscope.

Methods

During a period of 36 months between April 2009 and March 2012, 89 consecutive patients with small breasts were treated surgically. They underwent transaxillary types 2 or 3 dual-plane breast augmentation as outpatients. For the axillary endoscopic subglandular tunneling approach (AESTA), a long subglandular tunnel was created along the lateral portion of the pectoralis major muscle to reach the nipple–areolar complex. The type 2 dual-plane technique was applied in 67 patients, and the type 3 technique was used in 22 patients.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 37.5 years (range 31–48 years), and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 11 months (range 7–42 months). Good surgical outcomes were obtained, and the procedure was reproducible.

Conclusions

The use of AESTA allowed the authors to achieve types 2 and 3 dual-plane breast augmentation through a transaxillary incision. They believe that AESTA can yield constant and satisfactory outcomes similar to the inframammary and periareolar approaches.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpert BS, Lalonde DH (2008) MOC-PS(SM) CME article: breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Copeland SE, Ladd LA, Gu XQ, Mather LE (2008) The effect of general anesthesia on the central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity of local anesthetics. Anesth Analg 106:1140–1149

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu P, Feldman HS, Covino BM, Giasi R, Covino BG (1982) Acute cardiovascular toxicity of intravenous amide local anesthetics in anesthetized ventilated dogs. Anesth Analg 61:317–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams WP Jr, Conner WC, Barton FE Jr, Rohrich RJ (2000) Optimizing breast pocket irrigation: an in vitro study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tebbetts JB (2002) Achieving a predictable 24-h return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:293–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho LC (1993) Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 46:332–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Serra-Renom J, Garrido MF, Yoon T (2005) Augmentation mammaplasty with anatomic soft, cohesive silicone implant using the transaxillary approach at a subfascial level with endoscopic assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:640–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Momeni A, Padron NT, Bannasch H, Borges J, Bjorn Stark G (2006) Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a safe and predictable procedure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:1076–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Villafane O, Garcia-Tutor E, Taggart I (2000) Endoscopic transaxillary subglandular breast augmentation using silicone gel textured implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:212–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stumpfle RL, Pereirs-Lima LF, Valiati AA, Mazzini GS (2012) Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation: experience with 160 cases. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luan J, Mu D, Mu L (2009) Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1459–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tebbetts JB (2006) Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:53S–80S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a 2012 Inje University Research Grant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Won June Yoon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.H., Yoon, W.J. Axillary Endoscopic Subglandular Tunneling Approach for Types 2 and 3 Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 38, 521–527 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0306-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0306-6

Keywords

Navigation