Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New Otoplasty Approach: A Laterally Based Postauricular Dermal Flap as an Addition to Mustarde and Furnas to Prevent Suture Extrusion and Recurrence

  • Innovative Techniques
  • Aesthetic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prominent ear is the most common deformity of the external ear. The major causes can be an underdeveloped antithetical fold, concha hypertrophy, and prominence of the ear lobule. Since Ely’s first aesthetic correction of the prominent ear in 1881, more than 200 different techniques have been described, but the choice of procedure still remains the surgeon’s preference. This report presents the laterally based posterior auricular dermal flap technique as an adjunct to the conventional cartilage-sparing otoplasty. An elliptical skin incision was planned according to the classic prominent ear correction technique. Instead of the excision, skin was deepithelialized. From the inferior border of the incision, the dermal flap was incised and elevated in a medial-to-lateral direction. The posterior auricular dermal flap was used to support and cover the suture material. This method was used in the treatment of 17 consecutive patients. After a follow-up period of 6–32 months (mean 16 months), the patients were evaluated in terms of the recurrence and suture line problems. No suture line problems or recurrences were observed at the end of the follow-up period. Use of the posterior auricular dermal flap both prevents suture extrusion and decreases recurrences.

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA (2005) Otoplasty (review). Plast Reconstr Surg 115:60e–72e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamson PA, Litner JA (2006) Otoplasty technique (review). Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 14:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis DAF, Keohane JD (1992) A simplified approach to otoplasty. J Otolaryngol 21:66–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yazici I, Findikçioğlu F, Ozmen S, Noyan N, Yavuzer R (2009) Posterior auricular muscle flap as an adjunct to otoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:527–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, Mulliken JB (1997) Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg 38:263–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan ST, Shibu M, Gault DT (1994) A splint for correction of congenital ear deformities. Br J Plast Surg 47:575–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calder JC, Nassan A (1994) Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg 47:170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horlock N, Misra A, Gault DT (2001) The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardee and Furnas type otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1487–1490; discussion 1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassanpour SE, Moosavizadeh SM (2010) Posterior scorring of the scapha as a refinement in aesthetic otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:78–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoehn JG, Ashruf S (2005) Otoplasty: sequencing the operation for improved result (review). Plast Reconstr Surg 115:5e–16e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ely E (1881) An operation for prominence of the auricles. Arch Otolaryngol 10:97

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly P, Hollier L, Stal S (2003) Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Craniofac Surg 14:643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Madzharov MM (1989) A new method of auriculoplasty for protruding ears. Br J Plast Surg 42:285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pitangy I, Muller P, Nelson P et al (1987) Treatment of prominent ears: a 25-years survey of the island flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11:87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaye BL (1967) A simplified method for correcting the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg 40:44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chait L, Nicholson R (1999) One size fits all: a surgical technique for correction of all types of prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luckett WH (1969) A new operation for prominent ears based on anatomy of the deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 43:83

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hinderer UT, Del Rio JL, Fregenal FJ (1987) Otoplasty for prominent ears. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11:63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mustardee JC (1978) Correction of prominent ears using buried mattress sutures. Clin Plast Surg 5:459

    Google Scholar 

  20. Furnas DW (1968) Correction of the prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:189–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan KH (1986) Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg 39:270–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinha M, Richard B (2012) Postauricular fascial flap and suture otoplasty: a prospective outcome study of 227 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:367–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolga Aksan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basat, S.O., Askeroğlu, U., Aksan, T. et al. New Otoplasty Approach: A Laterally Based Postauricular Dermal Flap as an Addition to Mustarde and Furnas to Prevent Suture Extrusion and Recurrence. Aesth Plast Surg 38, 83–89 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0269-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0269-z

Keywords

Navigation