Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correction of Nipple Divergence in Reduction Mammaplasty: Pillar Extension Flap

  • Innovative Techniques
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lateral displacement of the nipple–areola complex becomes more obvious after reduction mammaplasty if it is not corrected. When performing mammaplasty, the Wise or vertical pattern incision lines should encompass the entire areola to prevent positioning of a pigmented area adjacent to the closure line. A high, laterally displaced areola can be repositioned using the circumvertical technique. However, in cases of breast ptosis with a laterally displaced areola, the limbs of the Wise or vertical pattern incision lines need to be modified. Transposition of the nipple–areola complex to a slightly higher location or larger area may also prevent distortion. This article describes a new modification of the vertical limbs of the Wise or vertical pattern mammaplasty that can help improve results.

Methods

This new technique was used in 16 breasts of 10 patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty. In these patients, the areola extended beyond the Wise or vertical pattern incision lines drawn on the breast. The residual areola on the lateral pillar was excised, and a matching extension was added to the medial pillar (pillar extension flap).

Results

No cases of skin necrosis were observed. Six of the ten patients were followed up for at least 6 months, and all were satisfied with postoperative breast shape and nipple location.

Conclusions

The pillar extension flap is a suitable technique for correction of lateral nipple displacement during reduction mammaplasty. This procedure can be performed alone or in combination with other techniques.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramo AC (1991) Pattern for reduction mammaplasty that uses a superior vertical dermal pedicle. Aesthetic Plast Surg 15:265–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baran CN, Peker F, Ortak T, Sensoz O, Baran NK (2001) Unsatisfactory results of periareolar mastopexy with or without augmentation and reduction mammaplasty: enlarged areola with flattened nipple. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:286–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “round block” technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14:93–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardenas-Camarena L, Vergara R (2001) Reduction mammaplasty with superior-lateral dermoglandular pedicle: another alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:693–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen CM, White C, Warren SM, Cole J, Isik FF (2004) Simplifying the vertical reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:162–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber RP, Jones HV Jr (1980) The “donut” mastopexy: indications and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulyas G (1996) Combination of the vertical and periareolar mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20:369–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulyas G (2004) Marking the position of the nipple–areola complex for mastopexy and breast reduction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2085–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hauben DJ (1984) Experience and refinements with the supero-medial dermal pedicle for nipple–areola transposition in reduction mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 8:189–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones G (2006) Breast reduction. In: Mattes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 539–584

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mattes SJ, Schooler W (2006) Inferior pedicle reduction techniques. In: Mattes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 601–630

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mottura AA (2003) Circumvertical reduction mastoplasty: new considerations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramirez OM (2002) Reduction mammaplasty with the “owl” incision and no undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:512–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh DJ, Noon B (2006) Secondary reconstructive surgery: mastopexy and reduction. In: Mattes SJ (ed) Plastic surgery. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1067–1081

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spear SL, Giese SY, Ducic I (2001) Concentric mastopexy revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1294–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Seyhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seyhan, A. Correction of Nipple Divergence in Reduction Mammaplasty: Pillar Extension Flap. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 752–761 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0133-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0133-1

Keywords

Navigation