Abstract
Background
Although widely used in women who have gigantomastia, free nipple graft breast reduction has several disadvantages with respect to the nipple–areola graft. In this report, we present the use of a nipple reconstruction method instead of free nipple grafting.
Method
Free nipple reduction mammaplasty is performed according to the Wise pattern. The nipple is removed from the areola graft. Nipple reconstruction is done at the most proximal and projected part of the reduced breast, which corresponds to the future nipple site. Afterward, the reconstructed nipple is encircled with the areola graft.
Results
A total of 18 patients underwent breast reduction with nipple reconstruction and areola grafting between April 2007 and March 2010. The mean follow-up period was 8 months. With the proposed nipple reconstruction technique, the mean projections of the nipple at the end of the operation and at 6 months were 1.2 and 0.9 cm, respectively.
Conclusion
The technique of using nipple reconstruction in amputation mammaplasty avoids the problems related to the nipple graft such as loss of projection, loss of sensation, or even total or partial loss of the nipple.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Isken T, Sen C, Onyedi M, Izmirli H (2008) A new application for increasing breast projection in free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:675–680
Gorgu M, Ayhan M, Aytug Z, Aksungur E, Demirdover C (2007) Maximizing breast projection with combined free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty and back folded dermoglandular inferior pedicle. Breast J 13:226–232
Ozerdem OR, Anlatici R, Maral T, Demiralay A (2002) Modified free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty to increase breast projection with superior and inferior dermoglandular flaps. Ann Plast Surg 49:506–510
McGregor JC, Hafeez A (2006) Is there still a place for free nipple areolar grafting in breast reduction surgery? A review of cases over a three year period. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:213–218
Sterodimas A, Pineda EF, Meirelles V, Pitanguy I (2008) Maximizing nipple graft survival after performing free nipple-areolar complex reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(8):971–972
Kroll S, Reece GP, Miller M et al (1997) Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1602–1605
Turgut G, Sacak B, Gorgulu T, Yesilada AK, Bas L (2009) Nipple reconstruction with bipedicled dermal flap: a new and easy technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:770–773
Tatlidede S, Yesilada AK, Egemen O, Bas L (2008) A new technique in nipple reconstruction. Dome technique with double pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 60:141–143
Nahabedian YM, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49:24–32
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mustafa Ozturk for his help with preparing the illustrations of the e-flap.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karabagli, Y., Kose, A.A., Mangir, S. et al. e-Flap Nipple Reconstruction in Amputation Mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 36, 1140–1143 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9955-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9955-5